Institut des Agents Infectieux, Parasitologie Mycologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Integrative Physiology of the Brain Arousal Systems, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, INSERM U1028-CNRS UMR 5292, Faculté de Médecine, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Service de Parasitologie/Mycologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, F-75013, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre-Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jul;25(7):892-897. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency of mould identification of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems - Vitek MS (VMS) and Microflex LT (MLT) - and the MSI application.
Moulds were collected retrospectively and prospectively to display epidemiological diversity of a microbiology laboratory. All of them were identified via sequencing. Strains were then identified using the VMS v3.0, the MLT, and the MSI software applied on MLT spectra. Rates of correct identifications to the species, to the complex, and to the genus level were compared with the molecular reference standard.
A total of 102 isolates were collected. The rate of correct identification to the species level with the MLT was 42.2% (43/102) with a threshold of 1.7 (vs. 16.7% (17/102) with a threshold of 2.0, p < 0.05). The VMS performed better than the MLT with a threshold of 1.7 for species (49.0% (50/102), p 0.33) and complex level identifications (71.6% (73/102) vs. 54.9% (56/102), p < 0.05). However the highest performances were observed when the MLT spectra were analysed via the Mass Spectrometry Identification (MSI) software reaching 90.2% (92/102) of correct identification to the species, 92.2% (94/102) to the species complex and 94.1% (96/102) to the genus level.
The VMS performed better than the MLT for mould identification. However, it remains of utmost importance to expand commercial databases, as performances of the MLT highly improved when using the MSI software and its extended database, reaching far above the VMS system. Thus the VMS could benefit from the use of this online tool.
本研究旨在比较两种基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)系统 - Vitek MS(VMS)和 Microflex LT(MLT)- 的模具识别效率和 MSI 应用。
回顾性和前瞻性收集霉菌,以展示微生物学实验室的流行病学多样性。所有这些都通过测序进行鉴定。然后使用 VMS v3.0、MLT 和应用于 MLT 光谱的 MSI 软件对菌株进行鉴定。将物种、复合物和属水平的正确鉴定率与分子参考标准进行比较。
共收集了 102 株分离株。MLT 鉴定到种水平的正确鉴定率为 42.2%(43/102),阈值为 1.7(与阈值为 2.0 时的 16.7%(17/102)相比,p<0.05)。VMS 的表现优于 MLT,阈值为 1.7 时,对物种(49.0%(50/102),p<0.05)和复合物水平鉴定的表现更好。然而,当通过 Mass Spectrometry Identification(MSI)软件分析 MLT 光谱时,观察到最高的性能,达到 90.2%(92/102)的正确鉴定率到种,92.2%(94/102)到种复合物和 94.1%(96/102)到属水平。
VMS 对模具鉴定的表现优于 MLT。然而,扩展商业数据库仍然至关重要,因为 MLT 的性能在使用 MSI 软件及其扩展数据库时得到了极大的提高,达到了远远超过 VMS 系统的水平。因此,VMS 可以从使用这个在线工具中受益。