Heilig Hart Algemeen Ziekenhuis Lier, Mechelsestraat 24, 2500, Lier, Belgium.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023 Oct;42(10):1153-1161. doi: 10.1007/s10096-023-04652-3. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
To evaluate and compare the performance of three commercial culture media, two filamentous fungi libraries, and two different protein extraction procedures in MALDI-TOF MS fungal identification.
A total of 21 quality control samples were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA), ID fungi plate medium (IDFP), and Sabouraud gentamicin chloramphenicol 2 agar (SGC2). For four consecutive days, fungal growths were inoculated on a MALDI target plate both by using a direct transfer technique (DT) and by using a formic acid-ethanol protein extraction procedure (EEP). The MALDI-TOF MS-generated spectra were identified by the MBT Bruker library and the MSI database.
Selective culture media (IDFP and SGC2) significantly outperformed the non-selective SDA medium. IDFP was superior to the SGC2 medium for dermatophyte identification. The EEP only demonstrated a benefit over DT in the underperforming SDA medium. The MBT Bruker library outperformed the MSI database in Aspergillus identification while the MSI database outperformed the MBT library in dermatophyte identification. For non-Aspergillus fungi, the libraries performed comparably.
The results of our study show the necessity of using selective culture media (IDFP and SGC2) for fungal identification with MALDI-TOF MS and demonstrate no significant benefit of the formic acid-ethanol protein extraction technique in these media. Given the relative strengths and weaknesses of the MBT library and the MSI database, it might currently be beneficial to consider these libraries as complementary and employ both databases to achieve optimal fungal identification.
评估和比较三种商业培养基于两种丝状真菌文库和两种不同蛋白质提取方法在 MALDI-TOF MS 真菌鉴定中的性能。
共培养 21 个质控样本于沙氏葡萄糖琼脂(SDA)、ID 真菌板培养基(IDFP)和沙氏庆大霉素氯霉素 2 琼脂(SGC2)上。连续四天,通过直接转移技术(DT)和甲酸-乙醇蛋白质提取程序(EEP)将真菌接种于 MALDI 靶板上。MALDI-TOF MS 生成的光谱由 MBT Bruker 库和 MSI 数据库进行鉴定。
选择性培养基于非选择性 SDA 培养基显著提高了鉴定性能。IDFP 对皮肤真菌的鉴定优于 SGC2 培养基。EEP 仅在表现不佳的 SDA 培养基中优于 DT。MBT Bruker 库在曲霉鉴定方面优于 MSI 数据库,而 MSI 数据库在皮肤真菌鉴定方面优于 MBT 库。对于非曲霉真菌,两个库的性能相当。
本研究结果表明,在 MALDI-TOF MS 中进行真菌鉴定需要使用选择性培养基于(IDFP 和 SGC2),并且在这些培养基中,甲酸-乙醇蛋白质提取技术没有显著益处。鉴于 MBT 库和 MSI 数据库的相对优缺点,目前可能有益的是将这两个库视为互补,并同时使用两个数据库以实现最佳真菌鉴定。