Lee Ui Yun, Jung Jinmu, Kwak Hyo Sung, Lee Dong Hwan, Chung Gyung Ho, Park Jung Soo, Koh Eun Jeong
Department of Bionanosystem Engineering, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.
Division of Mechanical Design Engineering, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018 Nov;61(6):689-699. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2018.0155. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
The goal of this study was to compare several parameters, including wall shear stress (WSS) and flow pattern, between unruptured and ruptured anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms using patient-specific aneurysm geometry.
In total, 18 unruptured and 24 ruptured aneurysms were analyzed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models. Minimal, average, and maximal wall shear stress were calculated based on CFD simulations. Aneurysm height, ostium diameter, aspect ratio, and area of aneurysm were measured. Aneurysms were classified according to flow complexity (simple or complex) and inflow jet (concentrated or diffused). Statistical analyses were performed to ascertain differences between the aneurysm groups.
Average wall shear stress of the ruptured group was greater than that of the unruptured group (9.42% for aneurysm and 10.38% for ostium). The average area of ruptured aneurysms was 31.22% larger than unruptured aneurysms. Simple flow was observed in 14 of 18 (78%) unruptured aneurysms, while all ruptured aneurysms had complex flow (p<0.001). Ruptured aneurysms were more likely to have a concentrated inflow jet (63%), while unruptured aneurysms predominantly had a diffused inflow jet (83%, p=0.004).
Ruptured aneurysms tended to have a larger geometric size and greater WSS compared to unruptured aneurysms, but the difference was not statistically significant. Flow complexity and inflow jet were significantly different between unruptured and ruptured ACoA aneurysms.
本研究的目的是使用患者特异性动脉瘤几何模型,比较未破裂和破裂的前交通动脉(ACoA)动脉瘤之间的几个参数,包括壁面切应力(WSS)和血流模式。
总共使用计算流体动力学(CFD)模型分析了18个未破裂和24个破裂的动脉瘤。根据CFD模拟计算最小、平均和最大壁面切应力。测量动脉瘤高度、瘤颈直径、纵横比和动脉瘤面积。根据血流复杂性(简单或复杂)和流入射流(集中或扩散)对动脉瘤进行分类。进行统计分析以确定动脉瘤组之间的差异。
破裂组的平均壁面切应力大于未破裂组(动脉瘤为9.42%,瘤颈为10.38%)。破裂动脉瘤的平均面积比未破裂动脉瘤大31.22%。在18个未破裂动脉瘤中的14个(78%)观察到简单血流,而所有破裂动脉瘤都有复杂血流(p<0.001)。破裂动脉瘤更有可能有集中的流入射流(63%),而未破裂动脉瘤主要有扩散的流入射流(83%,p=0.004)。
与未破裂动脉瘤相比,破裂动脉瘤往往具有更大的几何尺寸和更大的WSS,但差异无统计学意义。未破裂和破裂的ACoA动脉瘤之间的血流复杂性和流入射流有显著差异。