Christianson David, Becker Matthew S, Brennan Angela, Creel Scott, Dröge Egil, M'soka Jassiel, Mukula Teddy, Schuette Paul, Smit Daan, Watson Fred
School of Natural Resources and the Environment University of Arizona Tucson Arizona.
Zambian Carnivore Programme Mfuwe Eastern Province Zambia.
Ecol Evol. 2018 Sep 17;8(20):10147-10155. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4489. eCollection 2018 Oct.
Allocating resources to growth and reproduction requires grazers to invest time in foraging, but foraging promotes dental senescence and constrains expression of proactive antipredator behaviors such as vigilance. We explored the relationship between carnivore prey selection and prey foraging effort using incisors collected from the kills of coursing and stalking carnivores. We predicted that prey investing less effort in foraging would be killed more frequently by coursers, predators that often exploit physical deficiencies. However, such prey could expect delayed dental senescence. We predicted that individuals investing more effort in foraging would be killed more frequently by stalkers, predators that often exploit behavioral vulnerabilities. Further these prey could expect earlier dental senescence. We tested these predictions by comparing variation in age-corrected tooth wear, a proxy of cumulative foraging effort, in adult (3.4-11.9 years) wildebeest killed by coursing and stalking carnivores. Predator type was a strong predictor of age-corrected tooth wear within each gender. We found greater foraging effort and earlier expected dental senescence, equivalent to 2.6 additional years of foraging, in female wildebeest killed by stalkers than in females killed by coursers. However, male wildebeest showed the opposite pattern with the equivalent of 2.4 years of additional tooth wear in males killed by coursers as compared to those killed by stalkers. Sex-specific variation in the effects of foraging effort on vulnerability was unexpected and suggests that behavioral and physical aspects of vulnerability may not be subject to the same selective pressures across genders in multipredator landscapes.
将资源分配给生长和繁殖需要食草动物投入时间觅食,但觅食会加速牙齿衰老,并限制诸如警惕等主动反捕食行为的表现。我们利用从追捕型和潜行型食肉动物捕杀的猎物身上收集的门齿,探究了食肉动物猎物选择与猎物觅食努力之间的关系。我们预测,觅食投入较少精力的猎物会更频繁地被追捕者杀死,追捕者这类食肉动物常常利用猎物的身体缺陷。然而,这类猎物的牙齿衰老可能会延迟。我们预测,觅食投入更多精力的个体更频繁地会被潜行型食肉动物杀死,潜行型食肉动物常常利用猎物的行为弱点。此外,这些猎物的牙齿衰老可能会更早。我们通过比较成年(3.4 - 11.9岁)角马被追捕型和潜行型食肉动物捕杀后经年龄校正的牙齿磨损情况(累积觅食努力的一个指标)来检验这些预测。在每个性别中,捕食者类型都是经年龄校正的牙齿磨损的一个有力预测指标。我们发现,相比被追捕者杀死的雌性角马,被潜行型食肉动物杀死的雌性角马觅食努力更大,预期牙齿衰老更早,相当于多了2.6年的觅食时间。然而,雄性角马呈现出相反的模式,与被潜行型食肉动物杀死的雄性角马相比,被追捕者杀死的雄性角马牙齿磨损多了相当于2.4年的时间。觅食努力对易受伤害性影响的性别特异性差异出乎意料,这表明在多捕食者环境中,易受伤害性的行为和身体方面在不同性别中可能不会受到相同的选择压力。