Department of Hematology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Departement of Hematology, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, Italy.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jul;54(7):1067-1076. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0387-y. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is limited by availability of HLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs). The alternative use of unrelated donors (UDs) is currently challenged by haploidentical-related donors (HRDs). We retrospectively analyzed 209 consecutive patients younger than 60 years undergoing allo-HSCT from UDs (n = 128) or HRDs (n = 81). Cumulative incidences of grade 3-4 acute (17 vs. 2%, p = 0.003) and 2-year moderate and severe chronic (20 vs. 2%, p < 0.001) GVHD were significantly higher with UD. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better with HRD (51 vs. 69%, p = 0.019), without significant difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analyses confirmed the lower risk of acute and chronic GVHD (grade 2-4, HR = 0.43, p = 0.005; grade 3-4, HR = 0.20, p = 0.017; all grades, HR = 0.43, p = 0.012; moderate or severe, HR = 0.12, p = 0.004), better PFS (HR = 0.61, p = 0.046), and GRFS (HR = 0.47, p = 0.001) with HRD. This was confirmed in match-paired analysis. In the absence of MSDs, HRD could be considered as a suitable alternative for patients younger than 60 years.
异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)受到 HLA 匹配同胞供者(MSD)可用性的限制。目前,使用无关供者(UD)受到半相合相关供者(HRD)的挑战。我们回顾性分析了 209 例年龄小于 60 岁接受 UD(n=128)或 HRD(n=81)allo-HSCT 的连续患者。UD 组 3-4 级急性(17% vs. 2%,p=0.003)和 2 年中重度慢性(20% vs. 2%,p<0.001)GVHD 的累积发生率明显更高。HRD 组无进展生存(PFS)明显更好(51% vs. 69%,p=0.019),但复发(CIR)、非复发死亡率(NRM)和总生存(OS)的累积发生率无显著差异。多变量分析证实,HRD 组急性和慢性 GVHD(2-4 级,HR=0.43,p=0.005;3-4 级,HR=0.20,p=0.017;所有级别,HR=0.43,p=0.012;中重度,HR=0.12,p=0.004)的风险较低,PFS(HR=0.61,p=0.046)和 GRFS(HR=0.47,p=0.001)较好。在匹配分析中也得到了证实。在没有 MSD 的情况下,HRD 可被视为年龄小于 60 岁患者的合适替代方案。