Suppr超能文献

老年患者(75岁及以上)主动脉瓣狭窄的主动脉瓣置换术

Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Elderly Patients (75 Years or Older).

作者信息

Sohn Bongyeon, Choi Jae Woong, Hwang Ho Young, Kim Kyung Hwan, Kim Ki-Bong

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine.

出版信息

Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;51(5):322-327. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2018.51.5.322. Epub 2018 Oct 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the early and long-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in elderly patients in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2018, 94 patients aged ≥75 years underwent isolated AVR with stented bioprosthetic valves for aortic valve stenosis (AS). The main etiologies of AS were degenerative (n=63) and bicuspid (n=21). The median follow-up duration was 40.7 months (range, 0.6-174 months).

RESULTS

Operative mortality occurred in 2 patients (2.1%) and paravalvular leak occurred in 1 patient. No patients required permanent pacemaker insertion after surgery. Late death occurred in 11 patients. The overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 87.2% and 65.1%, respectively. The rates of freedom from valve-related events at 5 and 10 years were 94.5% and 88.6%, respectively. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (p=0.013) and chronic kidney disease (p=0.030) were significant factors affecting long-term survival. The minimal p-value approach demonstrated that an STS score of 3.5% was the most suitable cut-off value for predicting long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

Surgical AVR for elderly AS patients may be feasible in terms of early mortality and postoperative complications, particularly paravalvular leak and permanent pacemaker insertion. The STS score and chronic kidney disease were associated with long-term outcomes after AVR in the elderly.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了经导管主动脉瓣植入时代老年患者外科主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的早期和长期结局。

方法

2001年至2018年期间,94例年龄≥75岁的患者因主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)接受了带支架生物瓣膜的单纯AVR。AS的主要病因是退行性变(n = 63)和二叶式(n = 21)。中位随访时间为40.7个月(范围0.6 - 174个月)。

结果

2例患者(2.1%)发生手术死亡,1例患者发生瓣周漏。术后无患者需要植入永久性起搏器。11例患者发生晚期死亡。5年和10年的总生存率分别为87.2%和65.1%。5年和10年无瓣膜相关事件的发生率分别为94.5%和88.6%。胸外科医师协会(STS)评分(p = 0.013)和慢性肾脏病(p = 0.030)是影响长期生存的重要因素。最小p值法显示,STS评分为3.5%是预测长期生存的最合适临界值。

结论

对于老年AS患者,外科AVR在早期死亡率和术后并发症方面,特别是瓣周漏和永久性起搏器植入方面可能是可行的。STS评分和慢性肾脏病与老年患者AVR后的长期结局相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60fe/6200166/92756c674cb4/kjtcv-51-322f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis in Elderly Patients (75 Years or Older).
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Oct;51(5):322-327. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2018.51.5.322. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
2
3
Sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valves in elderly patients with aortic stenosis at intermediate risk: A multi-institutional study.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Mar;163(3):925-935.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.179. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
4
Reoperative Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Replacement for Degenerated Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Nov;102(5):1452-1458. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.086. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
6
Outcomes of isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in the era of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
J Card Surg. 2020 Jul;35(7):1452-1457. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14601. Epub 2020 May 3.
7
Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.076. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
8
Outcomes for Low-Risk Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Benchmark for Aortic Valve Technology.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct;104(4):1282-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.03.053. Epub 2017 Jun 11.
9
Long-term Outcomes in Octogenarians Following Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.
Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc. 2017 Jul-Dec;24(3-4):133.
10
Aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in very elderly patients aged 85 years and older.
Heart Vessels. 2020 Oct;35(10):1409-1418. doi: 10.1007/s00380-020-01620-1. Epub 2020 May 11.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: current status and future perspectives.
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jul 21;39(28):2625-2634. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy244.
2
When to SAVR in the age of TAVR? A perspective on surgical aortic valve replacement in 2018.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):139-141. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.03.014.
3
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.
4
Comparison of the Outcomes between Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged above 80.
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Aug;50(4):255-262. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.4.255. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
5
Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1321-1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700456. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
6
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
8
Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians.
Heart Lung Circ. 2014 Sep;23(9):841-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
10
Aortic valve replacement in the elderly: the real life.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jan;93(1):70-7; discussion 77-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.07.033. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验