Ricotta Emily E, Olivier Kenneth N, Lai Yi Ling, Prevots D Rebecca, Adjemian Jennifer
Epidemiology Unit, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Pulmonary Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
ERJ Open Res. 2018 Nov 2;4(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00109-2018. eCollection 2018 Oct.
Treatment guidelines exist for pulmonary complex (MAC) infection, although studies suggest poor concordance in clinician practice. Using a national database including hospital encounters of laboratory-confirmed MAC patients, we sought to characterise US treatment practices. We assessed patients in the Premier Healthcare Database from 2009 to 2013 with two or more MAC-positive cultures or one MAC-positive culture and the International Classification of Diseases (9th revision) code for pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria (PNTM). Treatment was characterised by patient-, provider- and facility-level factors; significant differences were assessed (p<0.05). Multilevel Poisson regression estimated adjusted relative risks (aRR) of receiving guidelines-based or macrolide resistance-promoting regimens. Of 1326 MAC patients, 645 (49%) received treatment: 10% received guidelines-based treatment and 18% resistance-associated therapy. Patients were more likely to receive guidelines-based therapy if they had multiple hospital encounters (aRR 1.5), codes for PNTM (aRR 5.7) or tuberculosis (aRR 4.5) or radiological procedures (aRR 10.9); multiple hospital encounters (aRR 0.8) or a tuberculosis code (aRR 0.1) were less likely to be associated with receiving resistance-promoting regimens. In hospital-based MAC patients, half received antibiotics active against MAC, a low proportion received therapy based on MAC guidelines and many received antibiotics that promote macrolide resistance. Improved implementation of guidelines-based treatment is needed to decrease use of regimens associated with macrolide resistance.
虽然研究表明临床医生在实践中的依从性较差,但针对非结核分枝杆菌肺病(MAC)感染已有治疗指南。我们利用一个包含实验室确诊的MAC患者医院诊疗记录的全国性数据库,试图描述美国的治疗实践情况。我们评估了2009年至2013年期间在Premier医疗数据库中,有两份或更多份MAC阳性培养结果,或一份MAC阳性培养结果且伴有国际疾病分类(第9版)肺部非结核分枝杆菌(PNTM)编码的患者。治疗情况根据患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗机构层面的因素进行描述;评估显著差异(p<0.05)。多级泊松回归估计接受基于指南或促进大环内酯类耐药方案的调整相对风险(aRR)。在1326例MAC患者中,645例(49%)接受了治疗:10%接受了基于指南的治疗,18%接受了与耐药相关的治疗。如果患者有多次住院经历(aRR 1.5)、PNTM编码(aRR 5.7)或结核病编码(aRR 4.5)或接受过放射学检查(aRR 10.9),则更有可能接受基于指南的治疗;多次住院经历(aRR 0.8)或结核病编码(aRR 0.1)与接受促进耐药方案的可能性较小有关。在以医院为基础的MAC患者中,一半接受了对MAC有效的抗生素治疗,接受基于MAC指南治疗的比例较低,许多患者接受了会促进大环内酯类耐药的抗生素治疗。需要更好地实施基于指南的治疗,以减少与大环内酯类耐药相关方案的使用。