Suppr超能文献

胆道和胰腺碎石设备。

Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices.

作者信息

Watson Rabindra R, Parsi Mansour A, Aslanian Harry R, Goodman Adam J, Lichtenstein David R, Melson Joshua, Navaneethan Udayakumar, Pannala Rahul, Sethi Amrita, Sullivan Shelby A, Thosani Nirav C, Trikudanathan Guru, Trindade Arvind J, Maple John T

出版信息

VideoGIE. 2018 Sep 26;3(11):329-338. doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2018.07.010. eCollection 2018 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Lithotripsy is a procedure for fragmentation or destruction of stones to facilitate their removal or passage from the biliary or pancreatic ducts. Although most stones may be removed endoscopically using conventional techniques such as endoscopic sphincterotomy in combination with balloon or basket extraction, lithotripsy may be required for clearance of large, impacted, or irregularly shaped stones. Several modalities have been described, including intracorporeal techniques such as mechanical lithotripsy (ML), electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), and laser lithotripsy, as well as extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

METHODS

In this document, we review devices and methods for biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy and the evidence regarding efficacy, safety, and financial considerations.

RESULTS

Although many difficult stones can be safely removed using ML, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD) has emerged as an alternative that may lessen the need for ML and also reduce the rate of adverse events. EHL and laser lithotripsy are effective at ductal clearance when conventional techniques are unsuccessful, although they usually require direct visualization of the stone by the use of cholangiopancreatoscopy and are often limited to referral centers. ESWL is effective but often requires coordination with urologists and the placement of stents or drains with subsequent procedures for extracting stone fragments and, thus, may be associated with increased costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Several lithotripsy techniques have been described that vary with respect to ease of use, generalizability, and cost. Overall, lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment for difficult biliary and pancreatic duct stones.

摘要

背景与目的

碎石术是一种用于破碎或破坏结石以促进其从胆管或胰管排出或通过的操作。尽管大多数结石可通过常规技术如内镜括约肌切开术联合球囊或网篮取石术在内镜下取出,但对于清除大的、嵌顿的或形状不规则的结石可能需要碎石术。已经描述了几种方式,包括体内技术如机械碎石术(ML)、液电碎石术(EHL)和激光碎石术,以及体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)。

方法

在本文中,我们回顾了胆管和胰管碎石术的设备和方法以及关于疗效、安全性和经济考量的证据。

结果

尽管使用ML可以安全地取出许多难处理的结石,但内镜乳头球囊扩张术(EPBD)已成为一种替代方法,可能会减少对ML的需求并降低不良事件发生率。当常规技术不成功时,EHL和激光碎石术在导管清除方面是有效的,尽管它们通常需要通过胰胆管镜直接观察结石,并且通常限于转诊中心。ESWL是有效的,但通常需要与泌尿科医生协调并放置支架或引流管,随后进行提取结石碎片的操作,因此可能会增加成本。

结论

已经描述了几种碎石术技术,它们在易用性、通用性和成本方面各不相同。总体而言,碎石术是治疗难处理的胆管和胰管结石的一种安全有效的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d779/6205352/b526a63f1f0a/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验