Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, A-1010, Vienna, Austria.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):531-537. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1543-5.
We investigated the origin of attention capture in the contingent-capture protocol during a search for two colors. When searching for the target color, cues similar to the target capture attention but cues dissimilar to the target do not capture attention. The results are typically explained by top-down contingent capture, a form of proactive control where participants set up attentional control settings (ACSs) for the target and cues matching the ACSs capture attention. However, based on recent research, we hypothesized that the situation could be more complicated during search for several features. Here, reactive control in the form of (cue) color-elicited selection of one of several separate pre-activated ACSs, one for each single searched-for feature, could contribute to performance. With the help of mixing and switch costs, we demonstrated that participants searched for two colors by separate pre-activated ACSs, and a closer inspection of the capture effects of the cues confirmed that reactive control contributed to ACS selection.
我们研究了在搜索两种颜色的同时,在偶然捕获协议中注意力捕获的起源。当搜索目标颜色时,与目标相似的线索会吸引注意力,但与目标不相似的线索不会吸引注意力。这些结果通常可以用自上而下的偶然捕获来解释,这是一种主动控制的形式,参与者为目标和与 ACS 匹配的线索设置注意力控制设置 (ACS),从而捕获注意力。然而,根据最近的研究,我们假设在搜索多个特征时,情况可能会更加复杂。在这里,以 (线索) 颜色引发选择预先激活的 ACS 之一的形式的反应性控制,每个单独搜索的特征都有一个 ACS,可能会对表现产生影响。借助混合和切换成本,我们证明了参与者通过单独的预先激活的 ACS 搜索两种颜色,并且对线索捕获效应的更仔细检查证实了反应性控制有助于 ACS 选择。