Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
Cancer Med. 2018 Dec;7(12):6365-6373. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1712. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
Esophageal small cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a rare malignancy for which there is no consensus management approach. This is the largest known analysis of nonmetastatic ESCC patients to date, evaluating national practice patterns and outcomes of surgical-based therapy vs chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs chemotherapy alone.
The National Cancer Data Base was queried for esophageal cancer patients with histologically confirmed nonmetastatic ESCC. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with receipt of surgical-based management. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) and the log-rank test is used to compare OS between groups; Cox univariate and multivariate analyses determined variables associated with OS.
Altogether, 323 patients were analyzed; 64 (20%) patients underwent surgical-based therapy, 211 (65%) CRT, and 48 (15%) chemotherapy alone. On multivariable analysis, no single factor significantly predicted for administration of surgery. Despite no OS differences between the surgery-based (median OS 21 months) and CRT arms (18 months), both were superior to CT alone (10 months) (P < 0.001). Among other factors, receiving any local therapy independently predicted for higher OS over chemotherapy alone on Cox multivariate analysis (P < 0.001).
This study of a large, contemporary national database demonstrates that most ESCC is treated with CRT in the United States; adding local therapy to systemic therapy may be beneficial to these patients, although individualized multidisciplinary management is still recommended.
食管小细胞癌(ESCC)是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,目前尚无共识的治疗方法。这是迄今为止对非转移性 ESCC 患者进行的最大规模的已知分析,评估了以手术为基础的治疗与放化疗(CRT)和单纯化疗的国家实践模式和结果。
国家癌症数据库对经组织学证实为非转移性 ESCC 的食管癌患者进行了检索。单变量和多变量逻辑回归确定了接受以手术为基础的治疗的相关因素。Kaplan-Meier 分析评估了总生存期(OS),对数秩检验用于比较组间 OS;Cox 单变量和多变量分析确定了与 OS 相关的变量。
共分析了 323 例患者;64 例(20%)患者接受了以手术为基础的治疗,211 例(65%)接受了 CRT,48 例(15%)接受了单纯化疗。多变量分析显示,没有单一因素显著预测手术的实施。尽管手术组(中位 OS 21 个月)和 CRT 组之间的 OS 无差异(18 个月),但两者均优于单纯 CT 组(10 个月)(P<0.001)。在其他因素中,在 Cox 多变量分析中,接受任何局部治疗独立预测 OS 高于单纯化疗(P<0.001)。
本研究对一个大型的、当代的国家数据库进行了研究,结果表明,在美国,大多数 ESCC 采用 CRT 治疗;在全身治疗的基础上增加局部治疗可能对这些患者有益,尽管仍建议个体化多学科管理。