• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[小儿人群迷走神经刺激的十年经验]

[Ten years' experience with vagus nerve stimulation in a paediatric population].

作者信息

Moro-De Faes G, Serrano-Moyano B, Cantarin-Extremera V, Moreno-Vinues B, Garcia-Fernandez M, Perez-Jimenez M A, Rivero-Martin M B, Garcia-Ezquiaga J, Duat-Rodriguez A, Ruiz-Falco Rojas M L

机构信息

Hospital Infantil Universitario Nino Jesus, 28009 Madrid, Espana.

出版信息

Rev Neurol. 2018 Nov 16;67(10):382-386.

PMID:30403281
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fifty million people are affected by epilepsy. Up to 30% are not controlled with the aid of antiepileptic drugs. The vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) is a therapeutic alternative that must be taken into account.

AIMS

To determine the effect of the VNS in a cohort of paediatric patients with refractory epilepsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of children with a VNS implanted between 2008 and 2017 in a tertiary hospital. Epidemiological, aetiological, clinical and electrophysiological data, along with VNS parameters were analysed.

RESULTS

The study included 35 patients, with a mean age when the VNS was implanted of 12.84 years (range: 3.1-18.7 years) and a mean time between onset of epilepsy and implantation of 7.2 years (range: 1.3-17.7 years). The causation was structural in 62.9% of cases. The most frequent epileptic conditions were: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and focal epilepsy, with a predominance of tonic seizures (57.1%). The video electroencephalogram showed multifocal anomalies (54%) and a pattern of epileptic encephalopathies (34.3%). Intellectual disability was associated in 94% of the cases. The mean of previous antiepileptic drugs was 9.6 ± 3 (range: 4-16). 43% responded to treatment (>= 50% reduction in number of seizures), with a mean reduction of 67.3%, which improved with higher ages of onset of epilepsy. Three patients were seizure-free (8.5%). The number of seizures decreased by 33% at six months and by 47.4% at 24 months. There was also a notable degree of cognitive (57%) and behavioural improvement (53%). In 28% of cases there were some side effects, but in general they were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

The VNS is a valid option in refractory epilepsy, with improvements not only in terms of seizures but also regarding cognitive-behavioural aspects, this being very important for the paediatric population.

摘要

引言

五千万人受癫痫影响。高达30%的患者无法通过抗癫痫药物得到控制。迷走神经刺激器(VNS)是一种必须考虑的治疗选择。

目的

确定VNS对一组难治性癫痫儿科患者的疗效。

患者与方法

对2008年至2017年在一家三级医院植入VNS的儿童进行回顾性研究。分析了流行病学、病因学、临床和电生理数据以及VNS参数。

结果

该研究纳入35例患者,VNS植入时的平均年龄为12.84岁(范围:3.1 - 18.7岁),癫痫发作与植入之间的平均时间为7.2年(范围:1.3 - 17.7年)。62.9%的病例病因是结构性的。最常见的癫痫病症为:Lennox - Gastaut综合征和局灶性癫痫,强直发作占主导(57.1%)。视频脑电图显示多灶性异常(54%)和癫痫性脑病模式(34.3%)。94%的病例伴有智力残疾。之前使用的抗癫痫药物平均数量为9.6 ± 3(范围:4 - 16)。43%的患者对治疗有反应(癫痫发作次数减少>= 50%),平均减少67.3%,癫痫发病年龄越大改善越明显。3例患者无癫痫发作(8.5%)。癫痫发作次数在6个月时减少33%,在24个月时减少47.4%。认知(57%)和行为(53%)也有显著改善。28%的病例出现一些副作用,但总体较轻。

结论

VNS是难治性癫痫的一种有效选择,不仅在癫痫发作方面有改善,在认知 - 行为方面也有改善,这对儿科人群非常重要。

相似文献

1
[Ten years' experience with vagus nerve stimulation in a paediatric population].[小儿人群迷走神经刺激的十年经验]
Rev Neurol. 2018 Nov 16;67(10):382-386.
2
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy: experience from Saudi Arabia.迷走神经刺激治疗难治性癫痫:来自沙特阿拉伯的经验。
Ann Saudi Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;35(1):41-5. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2015.41.
3
Combined Neuromodulation (Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Deep Brain Stimulation) in Patients With Refractory Generalized Epilepsy: An Observational Study.难治性全身性癫痫患者的联合神经调节(迷走神经刺激和脑深部刺激):一项观察性研究
Neuromodulation. 2023 Dec;26(8):1742-1746. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.08.449. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
4
Outcome of vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: the first three years of a prospective Japanese registry.迷走神经刺激术治疗耐药性癫痫的疗效:日本前瞻性登记研究的头三年
Epileptic Disord. 2017 Sep 1;19(3):327-338. doi: 10.1684/epd.2017.0929.
5
Vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in 29 children.迷走神经刺激术治疗29例儿童耐药性癫痫
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016 May;20(3):346-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
6
Vagus nerve stimulator implantation for epilepsy in a paediatric hospital: outcomes and effect on quality of life.一家儿科医院中迷走神经刺激器植入治疗癫痫:疗效及对生活质量的影响
Neurologia. 2015 Oct;30(8):465-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
7
Vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of refractory epilepsy in the CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder.迷走神经刺激治疗 CDKL5 缺乏症耐药性癫痫
Epilepsy Res. 2018 Oct;146:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
8
A prospective long-term study on the outcome after vagus nerve stimulation at maximally tolerated current intensity in a cohort of children with refractory secondary generalized epilepsy.一项针对难治性继发性全面性癫痫患儿在最大耐受电流强度下进行迷走神经刺激后结局的前瞻性长期研究。
Neuromodulation. 2013 Nov-Dec;16(6):551-6; discussion 556. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00522.x. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
9
Refractory epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis: vagus nerve stimulation with or without subsequent resective surgery.结节性硬化症的耐药性癫痫:迷走神经刺激术联合或不联合后续切除术。
Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Nov;16(3):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Sep 19.
10
Combined surgical intervention with vagus nerve stimulation following corpus callosotomy in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.对于患有伦诺克斯-加斯托综合征的患者,在胼胝体切开术后联合迷走神经刺激进行手术干预。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 May;158(5):1005-12. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2765-9. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Preliminary analysis of the effect of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of children with intractable epilepsy.迷走神经刺激术治疗儿童难治性癫痫效果的初步分析
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Dec 6;8(23):5918-5925. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5918.
2
Health Technology Assessment Report on Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.《迷走神经刺激治疗耐药性癫痫的卫生技术评估报告》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 24;17(17):6150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176150.