Steele Katherine M, Roh Eugene Y, Mahtani Gordhan, Meister David W, Ladd Amy L, Rose Jessica
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Motion & Gait Analysis Laboratory, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ann Rehabil Med. 2018 Oct;42(5):713-721. doi: 10.5535/arm.2018.42.5.713. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if shoulder and pelvic angular velocities differ at impact or peak magnitude between professional and amateur golfers. Golf swing rotational biomechanics are a key determinant of power generation, driving distance, and injury prevention. We hypothesize that shoulder and pelvic angular velocities would be highly consistent in professionals. METHODS: Rotational velocities of the upper-torso and pelvis throughout the golf swing and in relation to phases of the golf swing were examined in 11 professionals and compared to 5 amateurs using three-dimensional motion analysis. RESULTS: Peak rotational velocities of professionals were highly consistent, demonstrating low variability (coefficient of variation [COV]), particularly upper-torso rotational velocity (COV=0.086) and pelvic rotational velocity (COV=0.079) during down swing. Peak upper-torso rotational velocity and peak X-prime, the relative rotational velocity of uppertorso versus pelvis, occurred after impact in follow-through, were reduced in amateurs compared to professionals (p=0.005 and p=0.005, respectively) and differentiated professionals from most (4/5) amateurs. In contrast, peak pelvic rotational velocity occurred in down swing. Pelvic velocity at impact was reduced in amateurs compared to professionals (p=0.019) and differentiated professionals from most (4/5) amateurs. CONCLUSION: Golf swing rotational velocity of professionals was consistent in pattern and magnitude, offering benchmarks for amateurs. Understanding golf swing rotational biomechanics can guide swing modifications to help optimize performance and prevent injury.
目的:评估职业高尔夫球手和业余高尔夫球手在击球瞬间或峰值幅度时肩部和骨盆角速度是否存在差异。高尔夫挥杆的旋转生物力学是产生力量、击球距离和预防损伤的关键决定因素。我们假设职业选手的肩部和骨盆角速度会高度一致。 方法:通过三维运动分析,对11名职业选手和5名业余选手在整个高尔夫挥杆过程中以及与高尔夫挥杆阶段相关的上半身和骨盆的旋转速度进行了检测。 结果:职业选手的峰值旋转速度高度一致,变异性较低(变异系数[COV]),尤其是在下挥杆过程中,上半身旋转速度(COV = 0.086)和骨盆旋转速度(COV = 0.079)。上半身峰值旋转速度和上半身相对于骨盆的相对旋转速度X'峰值在随挥击球后出现,与职业选手相比,业余选手的这两项指标有所降低(分别为p = 0.005和p = 0.005),且能区分出大多数(4/5)业余选手与职业选手。相比之下,骨盆峰值旋转速度出现在下挥杆过程中。与职业选手相比,业余选手在击球瞬间的骨盆速度降低(p = 0.019),且能区分出大多数(4/5)业余选手与职业选手。 结论:职业高尔夫球手的挥杆旋转速度在模式和幅度上具有一致性,为业余选手提供了基准。了解高尔夫挥杆旋转生物力学可以指导挥杆动作的改进,以帮助优化表现并预防损伤。
Ann Rehabil Med. 2018-10
Front Sports Act Living. 2022-12-23
J Appl Biomech. 2011-8
Sensors (Basel). 2023-10-13
J Sports Sci. 2008-1-15
J Sports Sci Med. 2009-6-1
Int J Sports Med. 2008-6
Biomed Eng Online. 2013-2-11
Sports Biomech. 2010-11
Transl Sports Med. 2025-8-10
Sensors (Basel). 2023-10-13
Front Sports Act Living. 2022-12-23
Sports (Basel). 2022-6-9
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-10-14
Phys Sportsmed. 1982-7
Sports Biomech. 2012-6
J Appl Biomech. 2011-8
N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006-5
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008-7
Int J Sports Med. 2008-12
Int J Sports Med. 2008-6
J Sports Sci. 2008-1-15