Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, 200 S Jordan Avenue, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Center for Hearing and Deafness, Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, 137 Cary Hall, Buffalo, New York 14214, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Oct;144(4):2363. doi: 10.1121/1.5064790.
A Bayesian adaptive procedure, the interleaved-equal-loudness contour (IELC) procedure, was developed to improve the efficiency in estimating the equal-loudness contour. Experiment 1 evaluated the test-retest reliability of the IELC procedure using six naive normal-hearing listeners. Two IELC runs of 200 trials were conducted and excellent test-retest reliability was found at both the group and individual levels. Using the same group of listeners, Experiment 2 compared the IELC procedure to two other procedures that required frequency-by-frequency testing. One of these procedures was the commonly adopted interleaved staircase (ISC) procedure from Jesteadt [(1980). Atten. Percept. Psychophys. , 85-88]. The other procedure, the interleaved maximum-likelihood (IML) procedure, was a modification of the updated maximum-likelihood procedure [Shen and Richards (2012). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , 957-967]. For each of the ISC and IML procedures, two runs of approximately 500 trials were conducted, followed by one additional IELC run. The test-retest reliability of the IELC procedure was comparable to that of the ISC and IML procedure. The accuracies of all three procedures measured in Experiment 2 were similar, which was superior to the accuracies of the IELC runs from Experiment 1, indicating a potential training effect.
贝叶斯自适应程序,交错等响轮廓(IELC)程序,被开发出来以提高估计等响轮廓的效率。实验 1 使用 6 名天真的正常听力听众评估了 IELC 程序的测试-重测可靠性。进行了两次 200 次试验的 IELC 运行,在组和个体水平上都发现了极好的测试-重测可靠性。使用相同的听众组,实验 2 将 IELC 程序与需要逐频测试的另外两种程序进行了比较。其中一种程序是 Jesteadt [(1980)采用的常见交错阶梯(ISC)程序。Atten。感知。心理生理学,85-88]。另一种程序,交错最大似然(IML)程序,是更新的最大似然程序的修改版[Shen 和 Richards(2012)。J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,957-967]。对于 ISC 和 IML 程序中的每一个,进行了大约 500 次试验的两次运行,然后再进行一次额外的 IELC 运行。IELC 程序的测试-重测可靠性与 ISC 和 IML 程序的可靠性相当。实验 2 中测量的所有三种程序的准确性相似,优于实验 1 中 IELC 运行的准确性,表明存在潜在的训练效果。