Suppr超能文献

在估计等响曲线时交错贝叶斯自适应程序的可行性。

Feasibility of interleaved Bayesian adaptive procedures in estimating the equal-loudness contour.

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, 200 S Jordan Avenue, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.

Center for Hearing and Deafness, Department of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, 137 Cary Hall, Buffalo, New York 14214, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Oct;144(4):2363. doi: 10.1121/1.5064790.

Abstract

A Bayesian adaptive procedure, the interleaved-equal-loudness contour (IELC) procedure, was developed to improve the efficiency in estimating the equal-loudness contour. Experiment 1 evaluated the test-retest reliability of the IELC procedure using six naive normal-hearing listeners. Two IELC runs of 200 trials were conducted and excellent test-retest reliability was found at both the group and individual levels. Using the same group of listeners, Experiment 2 compared the IELC procedure to two other procedures that required frequency-by-frequency testing. One of these procedures was the commonly adopted interleaved staircase (ISC) procedure from Jesteadt [(1980). Atten. Percept. Psychophys. , 85-88]. The other procedure, the interleaved maximum-likelihood (IML) procedure, was a modification of the updated maximum-likelihood procedure [Shen and Richards (2012). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , 957-967]. For each of the ISC and IML procedures, two runs of approximately 500 trials were conducted, followed by one additional IELC run. The test-retest reliability of the IELC procedure was comparable to that of the ISC and IML procedure. The accuracies of all three procedures measured in Experiment 2 were similar, which was superior to the accuracies of the IELC runs from Experiment 1, indicating a potential training effect.

摘要

贝叶斯自适应程序,交错等响轮廓(IELC)程序,被开发出来以提高估计等响轮廓的效率。实验 1 使用 6 名天真的正常听力听众评估了 IELC 程序的测试-重测可靠性。进行了两次 200 次试验的 IELC 运行,在组和个体水平上都发现了极好的测试-重测可靠性。使用相同的听众组,实验 2 将 IELC 程序与需要逐频测试的另外两种程序进行了比较。其中一种程序是 Jesteadt [(1980)采用的常见交错阶梯(ISC)程序。Atten。感知。心理生理学,85-88]。另一种程序,交错最大似然(IML)程序,是更新的最大似然程序的修改版[Shen 和 Richards(2012)。J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,957-967]。对于 ISC 和 IML 程序中的每一个,进行了大约 500 次试验的两次运行,然后再进行一次额外的 IELC 运行。IELC 程序的测试-重测可靠性与 ISC 和 IML 程序的可靠性相当。实验 2 中测量的所有三种程序的准确性相似,优于实验 1 中 IELC 运行的准确性,表明存在潜在的训练效果。

相似文献

2
The contour test of loudness perception.响度感知的等高线测试。
Ear Hear. 1997 Oct;18(5):388-400. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199710000-00004.
5
Test-retest reliability of loudness scaling.响度标度的重测信度。
Ear Hear. 1996 Apr;17(2):120-3. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199604000-00005.

本文引用的文献

7
Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones.纯音等响度曲线。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Aug;116(2):918-33. doi: 10.1121/1.1763601.
8
Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration.作为时长函数的频谱响度总和。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Mar;111(3):1349-58. doi: 10.1121/1.1451065.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验