INSERM U1259, Université de Tours, Tours, France
Laboratoire de Virologie and CNR VIH-Laboratoire Associé, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.
J Virol. 2019 Jan 4;93(2). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01492-18. Print 2019 Jan 15.
Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) are promising agents for prevention and/or treatment of HIV-1 infection. However, the diversity among HIV-1 envelope (Env) glycoproteins impacts bnAb potency and breadth. Neutralization data on the CRF02_AG clade are scarce although it is highly prevalent in West Africa and Europe. We assessed the sensitivity to bnAbs of a panel of 33 early transmitted CRF02_AG viruses over a 15-year period of the French epidemic (1997 to 2012). Env pseudotyped CRF02_AG viruses were best neutralized by the CD4 binding site (CD4bs)-directed bnAbs (VRC01, 3BNC117, NIH45-46, and N6) and the gp41 membrane-proximal external region (MPER)-directed bnAb 10E8 in terms of both potency and breadth. We observed a higher resistance to bnAbs targeting the V1V2-glycan region (PG9 and PGT145) and the V3-glycan region (PGT121 and 10-1074). Combinations were required to achieve full coverage across this subtype. We observed increased resistance to bnAbs targeting the CD4bs linked to the diversification of CRF02_AG Env over the course of the epidemic, a phenomenon which was previously described for subtypes B and C. These data on the sensitivity to bnAbs of CRF02_AG viruses, including only recently transmitted viruses, will inform future passive immunization studies. Considering the drift of the HIV-1 species toward higher resistance to neutralizing antibodies, it appears necessary to keep updating existing panels for evaluation of future vaccine and passive immunization studies. Major progress occurred during the last decade leading to the isolation of human monoclonal antibodies, termed broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) due to their capacity to neutralize various strains of HIV-1. Several clinical trials are under way in order to evaluate their efficacy in preventive or therapeutic strategies. However, no single bnAb is active against 100% of strains. It is important to gather data on the sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies of all genotypes, especially those more widespread in regions where the prevalence of HIV-1 infection is high. Here, we assembled a large panel of clade CRF02_AG viruses, the most frequent genotype circulating in West Africa and the second most frequent found in several European countries. We evaluated their sensitivities to bnAbs, including those most advanced in clinical trials, and looked for the best combinations. In addition, we observed a trend toward increased resistance to bnAbs over the course of the epidemic.
广谱中和抗体(bnAbs)是预防和/或治疗 HIV-1 感染的有前途的药物。然而,HIV-1 包膜(Env)糖蛋白的多样性影响 bnAb 的效力和广度。尽管 CRF02_AG 丛在西非和欧洲高度流行,但有关该丛的中和数据却很少。我们评估了法国流行期间(1997 年至 2012 年)15 年内出现的 33 种早期传播的 CRF02_AG 病毒对 bnAbs 的敏感性。在效力和广度方面,CD4 结合位点(CD4bs)指导的 bnAbs(VRC01、3BNC117、NIH45-46 和 N6)和 gp41 膜近端外区(MPER)指导的 bnAb 10E8 对包膜假型 CRF02_AG 病毒的中和作用最佳。我们观察到针对 V1V2-聚糖区(PG9 和 PGT145)和 V3-聚糖区(PGT121 和 10-1074)的 bnAbs 的靶向作用的更高抵抗力。需要组合才能在该亚型中实现完全覆盖。我们观察到针对 CD4bs 的 bnAbs 的靶向作用的抵抗力增加,这与 CRF02_AG Env 的多样化有关,这一现象以前曾在 B 和 C 亚型中描述过。这些有关 CRF02_AG 病毒对 bnAbs 的敏感性的数据,包括仅最近传播的病毒,将为未来的被动免疫研究提供信息。考虑到 HIV-1 物种向更高的中和抗体抵抗力的漂移,似乎有必要不断更新现有的面板,以评估未来的疫苗和被动免疫研究。在过去的十年中取得了重大进展,导致了人类单克隆抗体的分离,由于其能够中和各种 HIV-1 株,因此被称为广谱中和抗体(bnAbs)。正在进行几项临床试验,以评估其在预防或治疗策略中的功效。但是,没有单一的 bnAb 能对 100%的菌株有效。收集所有基因型对中和抗体的敏感性数据很重要,尤其是在 HIV-1 感染流行率较高的地区更为广泛的基因型。在这里,我们组装了一个很大的 CRF02_AG 病毒群,这是西非最常见的基因型,也是几个欧洲国家发现的第二常见的基因型。我们评估了它们对 bnAbs 的敏感性,包括那些在临床试验中最先进的 bnAbs,并寻找最佳组合。此外,我们观察到在流行过程中 bnAbs 的抵抗力呈上升趋势。