Park Eon-Jeong, Kwon Eun-Young, Kim Hyun-Joo, Lee Ju-Youn, Choi Jeomil, Joo Ji-Young
Department of Periodontology and Institute of Translational Dental Sciences, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, Yangsan, Korea.
Department of Periodontology and Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University Dental Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018 Oct 24;48(5):295-304. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2018.48.5.295. eCollection 2018 Oct.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical and microbiological effects of an erythritol powder air-polishing device (EPAP) as a supplement to scaling and root planing (SRP) therapy in patients with moderate chronic periodontitis.
Clinical and microbiological evaluations were performed at 21 sites treated with SRP (control) and 21 sites treated with SRP+EPAP (test). All examinations were performed before treatment, 1 month after treatment, and 3 months after treatment.
There were no significant clinical differences between the test group and the control group. Microbiological analysis revealed that the relative expression level of was significantly lower in the test group than in the control group at 1 month after treatment. Clinical and microbiological results showed improvements at 1 month compared to baseline; in contrast, the results at 3 months after treatment were worse than those at 1 month after treatment.
In this study, both SRP and SRP+EPAP were clinically and microbiologically effective as non-surgical periodontal treatments. In particular, the SRP+EPAP group showed an antimicrobial effect on , a keystone bacterium associated with the onset of chronic periodontitis, in a short-term period. Periodic periodontal therapy, at intervals of at least every 3 months, is important for sustaining the microbiological effects of this treatment.
本研究旨在评估赤藓糖醇粉末空气抛光装置(EPAP)作为中度慢性牙周炎患者龈下刮治和根面平整(SRP)治疗补充手段的临床和微生物学效果。
对21个接受SRP治疗的部位(对照组)和21个接受SRP+EPAP治疗的部位(试验组)进行临床和微生物学评估。所有检查均在治疗前、治疗后1个月和治疗后3个月进行。
试验组和对照组之间无显著临床差异。微生物学分析显示,治疗后1个月试验组中 的相对表达水平显著低于对照组。临床和微生物学结果显示,与基线相比,治疗后1个月有改善;相比之下,治疗后3个月的结果比治疗后1个月的结果更差。
在本研究中,SRP和SRP+EPAP作为非手术牙周治疗在临床和微生物学方面均有效。特别是,SRP+EPAP组在短期内对与慢性牙周炎发病相关的关键细菌 显示出抗菌作用。至少每3个月进行一次定期牙周治疗对于维持该治疗的微生物学效果很重要。