Clinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):1105. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04898-z.
The aim of the randomized controlled clinical trial study was to evaluate the effectiveness in reducing pathologically increased pocket probing depths (PPD > 3 mm) using the Guided Biofilm Therapy (GBT) protocol (adapted to the clinical conditions in non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT): staining, air-polishing, ultrasonic scaler, air-polishing) compared to conventional instrumentation (staining, hand curettes/sonic scaler, polishing with rotary instruments) both by less experienced practitioners (dental students).
All patients were treated according to a split-mouth design under supervision as diseased teeth of quadrants I/III and II/IV randomly assigned to GBT or conventional treatment. In addition to the treatment time, periodontal parameters such as PPD and bleeding on probing (BOP) before NSPT (T0) and after NSPT (T1: 5 ± 2 months after T0) were documented by two calibrated and blinded examiners (Ethics vote/ Trial-register: Kiel-D509-18/ DRKS00026041).
Data of 60 patients were analyzed (stage III/IV: n = 36/ n = 24; grade A/ B/ C: n = 1/ n = 31/ n = 28). At T1, a PPD reduction of all diseased tooth surfaces was observed in 57.0% of the GBT group and 58.7% of the control group (p = 0.067). The target endpoint (PPD ≤ 4 mm without BOP) was achieved in 11.5% for GBT (conventional treatment: 11.2%; p = 0.714). With the exception for number of sites with BOP, which was at T1 15.9% in the GBT group and 14.3% in the control group (p < 0.05) no significant differences between the outcomes of the study were found. At 30.3(28.3) min, the treatment time was significantly shorter in GBT than in the control group at 34.6(24.5) min (p < 0.001).
With both protocols (GBT/ conventional instrumentation) comparably good clinical treatment results can be achieve in NSPT in stage III-IV periodontitis patients.
The study was registered before the start of the study and can be found under the number DRKS00026041 in the German Clinical Trials Register. The registration date was 19/08/2021.
这项随机对照临床试验旨在评估使用引导生物膜疗法(GBT)方案(适应非手术牙周治疗(NSPT)中的临床情况:染色、空气抛光、超声洁牙、空气抛光)减少病理性牙周袋探诊深度(PPD>3 毫米)的有效性,与传统器械(染色、手动龈下刮治器/超声洁牙器、旋转器械抛光)相比,由经验较少的从业者(牙科学生)使用。
所有患者均按分侧设计接受监督治疗,象限 I/III 和 II/IV 的患病牙齿随机分配至 GBT 或传统治疗。除了治疗时间外,两位经过校准和盲法检查的检查者还记录了牙周参数,如 NSPT 前(T0)和 NSPT 后(T1:T0 后 5±2 个月)的 PPD 和探诊出血(BOP)。
分析了 60 名患者的数据(III/IV 期:n=36/n=24;A/B/C 级:n=1/n=31/n=28)。在 T1 时,GBT 组所有患病牙面的 PPD 减少率为 57.0%,对照组为 58.7%(p=0.067)。GBT 组的目标终点(PPD≤4 毫米且无 BOP)为 11.5%(传统治疗组:11.2%;p=0.714)。除 T1 时 GBT 组的探诊出血位点数为 15.9%和对照组的 14.3%(p<0.05)外,两组之间未发现显著差异。GBT 组的治疗时间为 30.3(28.3)分钟,明显短于对照组的 34.6(24.5)分钟(p<0.001)。
在 III-IV 期牙周炎患者的 NSPT 中,两种方案(GBT/传统器械)均可获得相当好的临床治疗效果。
本研究在研究开始前进行了注册,可在德国临床试验注册中心以 DRKS00026041 号找到。注册日期为 2021 年 8 月 19 日。