• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and external validation of a pathological nodal staging score for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.开发并验证用于透明细胞肾细胞癌患者的病理性淋巴结分期评分。
World J Urol. 2019 Aug;37(8):1631-1637. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2555-5. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
2
External validation of the pathological nodal staging score in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A population-based study.上尿路尿路上皮癌病理淋巴结分期评分的外部验证:一项基于人群的研究。
Urol Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):33.e21-33.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.07.022. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
3
External Validation of the Pathologic Nodal Staging Score for Prostate Cancer: A Population-based Study.前列腺癌病理淋巴结分期评分的外部验证:一项基于人群的研究。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Aug 24. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.08.002.
4
Prediction of true nodal status in patients with pathological lymph node negative upper tract urothelial carcinoma at radical nephroureterectomy.根治性肾输尿管切除术时病理淋巴结阴性上尿路上皮癌患者真正的淋巴结状态预测。
J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.036. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
5
Pathologic nodal staging score for bladder cancer: a decision tool for adjuvant therapy after radical cystectomy.膀胱癌病理淋巴结分期评分:根治性膀胱切除术后辅助治疗的决策工具。
Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
6
Pathologic nodal staging scores in patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a postoperative decision tool.根治性前列腺切除术治疗患者的病理性淋巴结分期评分:一种术后决策工具。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):439-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.041. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
7
Staging lymphadenectomy in renal cell carcinoma must be extended: a sensitivity curve analysis.在肾细胞癌中,淋巴结分期必须扩大:敏感性曲线分析。
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):412-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11313.x. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
8
How to evaluate the adequacy of staging for nodal-negative epithelial ovarian cancer? Use of nodal staging score.如何评估淋巴结阴性上皮性卵巢癌分期的充分性?淋巴结分期评分的应用。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;30(2):e21. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e21. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
9
Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma:  Its Contemporary Role Related to Histologic Type, Tumor Size, and Nodal Status: A Retrospective Study.肾细胞癌根治性肾切除术:其与组织学类型、肿瘤大小及淋巴结状态相关的当代作用:一项回顾性研究
Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 Jun;145(6):837-42. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw059. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
10
Clinical and pathological nodal staging score for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: an external validation.膀胱尿路上皮癌的临床和病理淋巴结分期评分:一项外部验证
World J Urol. 2014 Apr;32(2):365-71. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1105-4. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining Optimal Lymph Node Yield in Gastrectomy: A Real-World Cohort Analysis.确定胃癌根治术中最佳淋巴结收获数量:一项真实世界队列分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 11;23(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03787-1.
2
Pathologic node-negative lung cancer: Adequacy of lymph node yield and a tool to assess the risk of occult nodal disease.病理阴性淋巴结肺癌:淋巴结检出量的充分性和评估隐匿性淋巴结疾病风险的工具。
Lung Cancer. 2022 Dec;174:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
3
Revisiting the role of lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma.重新审视淋巴结清扫在肾细胞癌中的作用。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Jul;7(Suppl 3):S91. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.04.45.
4
Beyond the predictors of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing lymph node dissection for renal cell carcinoma: the impact of tumour side and location.肾细胞癌淋巴结清扫患者淋巴结转移的预测因素之外:肿瘤侧别和位置的影响
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Apr;7(8):168. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.03.42.
5
Pathological nodal staging score for renal cell carcinoma: how to build reliable therapeutic choices basing on assumptions.肾细胞癌的病理性淋巴结分期评分:如何基于假设做出可靠的治疗选择。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Mar;7(Suppl 1):S54. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.03.06.

本文引用的文献

1
EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.EAU 指南:肾细胞癌. 2014 年更新版.
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
2
Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma-past, present, and future.肾细胞癌的辅助治疗——过去、现在和未来。
Semin Oncol. 2013 Aug;40(4):482-91. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.05.004.
3
Pathologic nodal staging scores in patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a postoperative decision tool.根治性前列腺切除术治疗患者的病理性淋巴结分期评分:一种术后决策工具。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):439-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.041. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
4
When to perform lymph node dissection in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a novel approach to the preoperative assessment of risk of lymph node invasion at surgery and of lymph node progression during follow-up.何时对肾细胞癌患者进行淋巴结清扫术:一种术前评估手术中淋巴结侵犯风险和随访中淋巴结进展风险的新方法。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E59-66. doi: 10.1111/bju.12125.
5
Prediction of true nodal status in patients with pathological lymph node negative upper tract urothelial carcinoma at radical nephroureterectomy.根治性肾输尿管切除术时病理淋巴结阴性上尿路上皮癌患者真正的淋巴结状态预测。
J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.036. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
6
Pathologic nodal staging score for bladder cancer: a decision tool for adjuvant therapy after radical cystectomy.膀胱癌病理淋巴结分期评分:根治性膀胱切除术后辅助治疗的决策工具。
Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.008. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
7
Staging lymphadenectomy in renal cell carcinoma must be extended: a sensitivity curve analysis.在肾细胞癌中,淋巴结分期必须扩大:敏感性曲线分析。
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):412-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11313.x. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
8
A review of integrated staging systems for renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌的综合分期系统综述。
Eur Urol. 2012 Aug;62(2):303-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.049. Epub 2012 May 3.
9
Lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌的淋巴结清扫术。
Eur Urol. 2011 Dec;60(6):1212-20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
10
Prognostic factors and predictive models in renal cell carcinoma: a contemporary review.肾细胞癌的预后因素和预测模型:当代综述。
Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):644-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.041. Epub 2011 Jun 30.

开发并验证用于透明细胞肾细胞癌患者的病理性淋巴结分期评分。

Development and external validation of a pathological nodal staging score for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2019 Aug;37(8):1631-1637. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2555-5. Epub 2018 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-018-2555-5
PMID:30406477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8389144/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and externally validate a model that quantifies the likelihood that a pathologically node-negative patient with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) has, indeed, no lymph node metastasis (LNM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 1389 patients treated with radical nephrectomy (RN) and lymph node dissection (LND) were analyzed. For external validation, we used data from 2270 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. We estimated the sensitivity of pathologic nodal staging using a beta-binomial model and developed a pathological nodal staging score (pNSS), which represents the probability that a patient is correctly staged as node negative as a function of the number of examined lymph nodes (LNs).

RESULTS

The mean and median number of LNs removed were 7.0 and 5.0 (standard deviation, SD 6.6; interquartile range, IQR 7.0) in the development cohort and 5.6 and 2.0 (SD 8.6, IQR 5.0) in the validation cohort, respectively. The probability of missing a positive LN decreased with increasing number of LNs examined. In both the validation and the development cohort, the number of LNs needed for correctly staging a patient as node negative increased with higher pathological tumor stage and Fuhrman grade.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of examined LNs needed for adequate nodal staging in cRCC depends on pathological tumor stage and Fuhrman grade. We developed here and then externally validated a pNSS, which could help to refine patient counseling, decision-making regarding risk-stratified surveillance regimens and inclusion criteria for clinical trials of adjuvant therapy.

摘要

目的

开发并外部验证一个模型,以量化病理上淋巴结阴性的透明细胞肾细胞癌(cRCC)患者确实没有淋巴结转移(LNM)的可能性。

患者与方法

分析了 1389 例接受根治性肾切除术(RN)和淋巴结清扫术(LND)治疗的患者的数据。为了外部验证,我们使用了 Surveillance,Epidemiology and End Results(SEER)数据库中 2270 例患者的数据。我们使用β二项式模型估计病理淋巴结分期的敏感性,并开发了一个病理淋巴结分期评分(pNSS),它代表患者作为阴性节点正确分期的概率作为检查的淋巴结数量(LNs)的函数。

结果

在开发队列中,平均和中位数切除的 LNs 数分别为 7.0 和 5.0(标准差 6.6;四分位距 IQR 为 7.0),在验证队列中分别为 5.6 和 2.0(标准差 8.6,IQR 为 5.0)。随着检查的 LNs 数量增加,漏检阳性 LNs 的概率降低。在验证和开发队列中,正确分期为阴性节点的患者所需的 LNs 数量均随病理肿瘤分期和 Fuhrman 分级的升高而增加。

结论

cRCC 中进行充分淋巴结分期所需的检查 LNs 数量取决于病理肿瘤分期和 Fuhrman 分级。我们在这里开发并随后外部验证了 pNSS,这有助于完善患者咨询、风险分层监测方案的决策以及辅助治疗临床试验的纳入标准。