Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University Medical-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):439-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.041. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
Nodal metastasis is the strongest risk factor of disease recurrence in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).
To develop a model that allows quantification of the likelihood that a pathologically node-negative patient is indeed free of nodal metastasis.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from patients treated with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND; n=7135) for PCa between 2000 and 2011 were analyzed. For external validation, we used data from patients (n=4209) who underwent an anatomically defined extended PLND.
RP and PLND.
We developed a novel pathologic (postoperative) nodal staging score (pNSS) that represents the probability that a patient is correctly staged as node negative based on the number of examined nodes and the patient's characteristics.
In the development and validation cohorts, the probability of missing a positive node decreases with an increasing number of nodes examined. Whereas in pT2 patients, a 90% pNSS was achieved with one single examined node in both the development and validation cohort, a similar level of nodal staging accuracy was achieved in pT3a patients by examining five and nine nodes, respectively. The pT3b/T4 patients achieved a pNSS of 80% and 70% when 17 and 20 nodes in the development and validation cohort were examined, respectively. This study is limited by its retrospective design and multicenter nature. The number of nodes removed was not directly correlated with the extent/template of PLND.
Every patient needs PLND for accurate nodal staging. However, a one-size-fits-all approach is too inaccurate. We developed a tool that indicates a node-negative patient is indeed free of lymph node metastasis by evaluating the number of examined nodes, pT stage, RP Gleason score, surgical margins, and prostate-specific antigen. This tool may help in postoperative decision making.
淋巴结转移是局限性前列腺癌(PCa)患者接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)治疗后疾病复发的最强危险因素。
开发一种模型,以量化病理上淋巴结阴性患者确实没有淋巴结转移的可能性。
设计、地点和参与者:分析了 2000 年至 2011 年间接受 RP 和盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PLND)治疗 PCa 的患者(n=7135)的数据。为了外部验证,我们使用了接受解剖定义的扩展 PLND 的患者(n=4209)的数据。
RP 和 PLND。
我们开发了一种新的病理(术后)淋巴结分期评分(pNSS),它代表了根据检查的淋巴结数量和患者特征,患者被正确分期为淋巴结阴性的概率。
在开发和验证队列中,漏检阳性淋巴结的概率随着检查的淋巴结数量的增加而降低。在 pT2 患者中,在开发和验证队列中,仅检查一个淋巴结即可达到 90%的 pNSS,而在 pT3a 患者中,分别检查五个和九个淋巴结即可达到类似的淋巴结分期准确性。在 pT3b/T4 患者中,在开发和验证队列中分别检查 17 个和 20 个淋巴结时,pNSS 分别达到 80%和 70%。本研究受到其回顾性设计和多中心性质的限制。切除的淋巴结数量与 PLND 的范围/模板没有直接关系。
每位患者都需要 PLND 进行准确的淋巴结分期。然而,一刀切的方法太不准确。我们开发了一种工具,通过评估检查的淋巴结数量、pT 分期、RP 前列腺特异性抗原、Gleason 评分、手术切缘等指标,来评估病理上淋巴结阴性的患者是否确实没有淋巴结转移。该工具可能有助于术后决策。