Suppr超能文献

直肠肿瘤手术中行脾曲游离:我们是否一直需要?

Splenic flexure mobilization in rectal cancer surgery: do we always need it?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery and Polytrauma, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Via Pio II n.3, 20153, Milan, Italy.

Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery III, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2019 Sep;71(3):505-513. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0603-8. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

Abstract

Splenic flexure (SFM) in rectal cancer surgery is a crucial step which may increase the difficulty of the operation. The aim of this retrospective single-center study is to demonstrate if the selective omission of SFM during anterior rectal resection can reduce the complexity of the operation, without affecting post-operative and oncologic outcomes. Data of 112 consecutive rectal resections for cancer from March 2010 to March 2017 were analyzed and divided into two groups: SFM and No-SFM. A sub-analysis was then performed for laparoscopy and traditional cases. Post-operative and oncologic outcomes, including overall (OS) and cancer-related survival (CRS), were analyzed and compared. SFM was performed in 42% of cases and laparoscopy was used in 73.2%. Operative time resulted significantly lower in the No-SFM group (190 vs. 225 min, p = 0.01). In laparoscopy in the No-SFM group, operative time and post-operative stay were significantly lower (205.5 vs. 222.5 min, p = 0.04; 9 vs. 10 days, p = 0.01). Most of the open resections were performed without SFM (35.4% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.02). No statistical significant differences were found in OS and CRS in the two groups. We support the hypothesis that every surgeon should carry out an accurate intra-operative evaluation to perform a selective SFM. When possible, SFM can be safely avoided with no additional risks in terms of post-operative and oncologic outcomes.

摘要

直肠肿瘤手术中的脾曲(SFM)是一个关键步骤,可能会增加手术难度。本回顾性单中心研究旨在证明,在直肠前切除术时选择性地省略 SFM 是否可以降低手术的复杂性,而不会影响术后和肿瘤学结果。分析了 2010 年 3 月至 2017 年 3 月期间连续进行的 112 例直肠癌切除术患者的数据,并将其分为 SFM 组和 No-SFM 组。然后对腹腔镜和传统手术进行了亚分析。分析并比较了术后和肿瘤学结果,包括总生存期(OS)和癌症相关生存率(CRS)。42%的病例中进行了 SFM,73.2%的病例中使用了腹腔镜。No-SFM 组的手术时间明显更短(190 分钟 vs. 225 分钟,p = 0.01)。在 No-SFM 组的腹腔镜手术中,手术时间和术后住院时间明显更短(205.5 分钟 vs. 222.5 分钟,p = 0.04;9 天 vs. 10 天,p = 0.01)。大多数开放性手术都没有进行 SFM(35.4% vs. 14.9%,p = 0.02)。两组的 OS 和 CRS 无统计学差异。我们支持这样的假设,即每个外科医生都应该进行准确的术中评估,以选择性地进行 SFM。在可能的情况下,选择性地省略 SFM 可以安全进行,不会增加术后和肿瘤学结果的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验