• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测直肠癌机器人前切除术选择性曲屈运动的因素:一项前瞻性队列分析。

Predictors for selective flexure mobilization during robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort analysis.

机构信息

Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.

Medical School, University of Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5388-5396. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10008-x. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-023-10008-x
PMID:37010604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10322756/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) may be indicated during anterior resection to provide a tension-free anastomosis. However, to date, no score allows identifying patients who may benefit from SFM.

METHODS

Patients who underwent robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer were identified from a prospective register. Demographic and cancer-related variables were extracted, and predictors of SFM were identified using regression models. Thereafter, 20 patients with SFM and 20 patients without SFM were randomly selected and their pre-operative CTscan were reviewed. The radiological index was defined as 1/(sigmoid length/pelvis depth). The optimal cut-off value for predicting SFM was identified using ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

Five hundred and twenty-four patients were included. SFM was performed in 121 patients (27.8%) and increased operative time by 21.8 min (95% CI: 11.3 to 32.4, p < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between patient with or without SFM. Realization of an anastomosis was the main predictor for SFM (OR: 42.4, 95% CI: 5.8 to 308.5, p < 0.001). In patients with colorectal anastomosis, both sigmoid length (15 ± 5.1 cm versus 24.2 ± 80.9 cm, p < 0.001) and radiological index (1 ± 0.3 versus 0.6 ± 0.2, p < 0.001) differed between patients who had SFM and patients who did not. ROC curve analysis of the radiological index indicated an optimal cut-off value of 0.8 (sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 90%).

CONCLUSION

SFM was performed in 27.8% of patients who underwent robotic anterior resection, and increased operative time by 21.8 min. For optimal surgical planning, patients requiring SFM can be identified based on pre-operative CT using the index 1/(sigmoid length/pelvis depth) with a cut-off value set at 0.8.

摘要

简介

脾曲游离术(SFM)可能在直肠前切除术时使用,以提供无张力吻合。然而,到目前为止,还没有评分可以确定哪些患者可能受益于 SFM。

方法

从前瞻性登记处确定接受机器人直肠前切除术的直肠癌患者。提取人口统计学和癌症相关变量,并使用回归模型确定 SFM 的预测因素。然后,随机选择 20 例接受 SFM 和 20 例未接受 SFM 的患者,并回顾其术前 CT 扫描。放射学指数定义为 1/(乙状结肠长度/骨盆深度)。使用 ROC 曲线分析确定预测 SFM 的最佳截断值。

结果

共纳入 524 例患者。121 例(27.8%)患者行 SFM,手术时间延长 21.8 分钟(95%CI:11.3 至 32.4,p<0.001)。有或没有 SFM 的患者术后并发症发生率无差异。吻合的实现是 SFM 的主要预测因素(OR:42.4,95%CI:5.8 至 308.5,p<0.001)。在结直肠吻合患者中,SFM 患者的乙状结肠长度(15±5.1cm 与 24.2±80.9cm,p<0.001)和放射学指数(1±0.3 与 0.6±0.2,p<0.001)均与未行 SFM 的患者不同。放射学指数的 ROC 曲线分析表明,最佳截断值为 0.8(灵敏度:75%,特异性:90%)。

结论

在接受机器人直肠前切除术的患者中,27.8%的患者行 SFM,手术时间延长 21.8 分钟。为了进行最佳的手术规划,可以使用术前 CT 基于指数 1/(乙状结肠长度/骨盆深度),并将截断值设置为 0.8,识别需要 SFM 的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8547/10322756/14b39829edc6/464_2023_10008_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8547/10322756/aa705f42fa27/464_2023_10008_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8547/10322756/294616304ca9/464_2023_10008_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8547/10322756/14b39829edc6/464_2023_10008_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8547/10322756/aa705f42fa27/464_2023_10008_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8547/10322756/294616304ca9/464_2023_10008_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8547/10322756/14b39829edc6/464_2023_10008_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors for selective flexure mobilization during robotic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort analysis.预测直肠癌机器人前切除术选择性曲屈运动的因素:一项前瞻性队列分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5388-5396. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10008-x. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
How much colonic redundancy could be obtained by splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic anterior or low anterior resection?在腹腔镜前切除术或低位前切除术中,通过脾曲游离可获得多少结肠冗长?
Int J Med Sci. 2014 Jun 9;11(9):857-62. doi: 10.7150/ijms.8874. eCollection 2014.
3
The selective use of splenic flexure mobilization is safe in both laparoscopic and open anterior resections.选择性地游离脾曲在腹腔镜和开腹前切除术都是安全的。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;14(10):1255-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02927.x.
4
A comprehensive evaluation of 80 consecutive robotic low anterior resections: impact of not mobilizing the splenic flexure alongside low-tie vascular ligation as a standardized technique.80 例连续机器人低位前切除术的综合评估:不伴低位结扎血管同时游离脾曲作为标准化技术的影响。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 2;18(1):156. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01917-7.
5
Is routine splenic flexure mobilization always necessary in laparotomic or laparoscopic anterior rectal resection? A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis.剖腹或腹腔镜前直肠切除术中常规游离脾曲是否总是必要?系统评价和综合荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1643-1661. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01135-y. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
6
Splenic flexure mobilization and anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer: A multicentre cohort study.直肠前切除术中脾曲游离和吻合口漏:一项多中心队列研究。
Scand J Surg. 2023 Dec;112(4):246-255. doi: 10.1177/14574969231181222. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
7
[Mobilization of splenic flexure - routine or selective (results of a single-center randomized study)].[脾曲游离术——常规还是选择性(一项单中心随机研究的结果)]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2022(7):33-44. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202207133.
8
Laparoscopic Mobilization of the Splenic Flexure as the First Step of Restorative Colorectal Resection.腹腔镜游离脾曲作为结直肠修复性切除的第一步
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2019 Mar-Apr;114(2):268-277. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.114.2.268.
9
Laparoscopic rectal resection without splenic flexure mobilization: a prospective study assessing anastomotic safety.未游离脾曲的腹腔镜直肠切除术:一项评估吻合口安全性的前瞻性研究
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Sep-Oct;56(94-95):1354-8.
10
A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci® surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection.四臂标准达芬奇®手术系统的新应用:全机器人辅助左半结肠或直肠切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jun;25(6):1945-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1492-1. Epub 2010 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of difficulty in robotic splenic flexure mobilization during rectal cancer surgery.直肠癌手术中机器人脾曲游离困难的预测因素。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 17;40(1):122. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04916-8.
2
Applicability and results of the versius surgical robotic system in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of the literature.Versius手术机器人系统在结直肠手术中的适用性及结果:文献系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 28;19(1):182. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02336-y.
3
Oncological and Clinical Impacts of Routine Splenic Flexure Mobilization in Anterior Resection.

本文引用的文献

1
The Mesentery in Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision.机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术中的系膜
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2022 Aug 10;35(4):298-305. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743583. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Is routine splenic flexure mobilization always necessary in laparotomic or laparoscopic anterior rectal resection? A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis.剖腹或腹腔镜前直肠切除术中常规游离脾曲是否总是必要?系统评价和综合荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1643-1661. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01135-y. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
3
Classification of the colonic splenic flexure based on three-dimensional CT analysis.
脾曲常规游离在直肠癌前切除术中的肿瘤学及临床影响
Cureus. 2024 Nov 22;16(11):e74270. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74270. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
A comprehensive evaluation of 80 consecutive robotic low anterior resections: impact of not mobilizing the splenic flexure alongside low-tie vascular ligation as a standardized technique.80 例连续机器人低位前切除术的综合评估:不伴低位结扎血管同时游离脾曲作为标准化技术的影响。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 2;18(1):156. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01917-7.
基于三维 CT 分析的结肠脾曲分类。
BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa040.
4
Splenic flexure mobilization for sigmoid and low anterior resections in the minimally invasive era: How often and at what cost?微创时代乙状结肠和低位前切除术的脾曲游离:需要多少次及花费多少?
Am J Surg. 2020 Jul;220(1):191-196. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.029. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
5
Examining Utility of Routine Splenic Flexure Mobilization during Colectomy and Impact on Anastomotic Complications.探讨结肠切除术时常规游离脾曲的效用及其对吻合口并发症的影响。
Am J Surg. 2020 Jun;219(6):998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.07.030. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
6
Splenic Flexure Mobilization in Sigmoid and Rectal Resections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.乙状结肠和直肠切除术中脾曲游离:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Technol Int. 2019 May 15;34:169-182.
7
Splenic flexure mobilization in rectal cancer surgery: do we always need it?直肠肿瘤手术中行脾曲游离:我们是否一直需要?
Updates Surg. 2019 Sep;71(3):505-513. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0603-8. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
8
The Safety of Selective Use of Splenic Flexure Mobilization in Sigmoid and Rectal Resections-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乙状结肠和直肠切除术中选择性使用脾曲游离术的安全性——系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2018 Oct 27;7(11):392. doi: 10.3390/jcm7110392.
9
The three approaches to the colonic splenic flexure mobilization - a video vignette.结肠脾曲游离的三种方法——视频简讯
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct;19(10):948-949. doi: 10.1111/codi.13843.
10
How much colonic redundancy could be obtained by splenic flexure mobilization in laparoscopic anterior or low anterior resection?在腹腔镜前切除术或低位前切除术中,通过脾曲游离可获得多少结肠冗长?
Int J Med Sci. 2014 Jun 9;11(9):857-62. doi: 10.7150/ijms.8874. eCollection 2014.