• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残留结石碎片:临床意义和技术创新。

Residual stone fragments: clinical implications and technological innovations.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg - Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Curr Opin Urol. 2019 Mar;29(2):129-134. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000571.

DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000571
PMID:30407220
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the recent literature on the topic of residual stone fragments in particular novel developments in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

The urological position towards residual fragments has shifted in recent years from observation, to active retrieval with innovative methods, to algorithm-based predictions of surgical outcomes. Novel technologies have been described to extract residual fragments through magnetism, a polyethylene endoscopic pouch and a biocompatible stone adhesive. In an effort to have a tighter grip over the outcome of residual fragments, artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been developed to accurately predict surgical outcomes in terms of stone clearance and secondary procedures.

SUMMARY

Growing evidence continues to show the term clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) for residual fragments of 4 mm or less to be a misnomer. In fact, only a third of CIRF is spontaneously cleared from the kidney after surgery and may become a cause for reintervention being both costly and significantly affecting patients' well being. Several novel methods which have been developed to extract residual fragments require further in-vivo investigations to confirm their safety and efficacy. ANNs algorithms are increasingly being used to predict surgical outcomes in stone therapy and assist in preoperative patient counselling and decision-making.

摘要

目的综述

总结近年来关于残余结石碎片的文献,特别是该领域的新进展。

最近的发现

近年来,泌尿外科医生对残余结石碎片的态度已经从观察转变为积极地使用创新方法进行清除,再到基于算法预测手术结果。已经有新的技术被描述用于通过磁性、聚乙烯内镜袋和生物相容性结石粘合剂来提取残余碎片。为了更好地控制残余碎片的结果,已经开发出人工神经网络 (ANNs) 来准确预测结石清除和二次手术等方面的手术结果。

总结

越来越多的证据表明,残余结石碎片小于或等于 4 毫米的“临床无意义残余碎片”(CIRF)这个术语是不准确的。实际上,只有三分之一的 CIRF 在手术后会自发从肾脏中排出,可能会导致再次干预,这既昂贵又会严重影响患者的生活质量。已经开发出几种新的方法来提取残余碎片,需要进一步的体内研究来确认其安全性和有效性。ANNs 算法越来越多地用于预测结石治疗的手术结果,并有助于术前患者咨询和决策制定。

相似文献

1
Residual stone fragments: clinical implications and technological innovations.残留结石碎片:临床意义和技术创新。
Curr Opin Urol. 2019 Mar;29(2):129-134. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000571.
2
[Significance of "clinically insignificant residual fragments" (CIRF) after ESWL].[体外冲击波碎石术后“临床无意义残留碎片”(CIRF)的意义]
Urologe A. 1997 May;36(3):226-30. doi: 10.1007/s001200050094.
3
Novel Biocompatible Adhesive for Intrarenal Embedding and Endoscopic Removal of Small Residual Fragments after Minimally Invasive Stone Treatment in an Ex Vivo Porcine Kidney Model: Initial Evaluation of a Prototype.新型生物相容性黏合剂在微创结石治疗后肾内嵌入和内镜取出小残余碎片的应用:在离体猪肾模型中的初步评价。
J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1772-1777. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.094. Epub 2016 May 30.
4
5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片患者的5年随访
Eur Urol. 2005 Jun;47(6):860-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.01.005. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
5
How significant are clinically insignificant residual fragments following lithotripsy?
Curr Opin Urol. 2005 Mar;15(2):127-31. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000160628.43860.f9.
6
Fate of clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with EDAP LT-01 lithotripter.使用EDAP LT-01碎石机进行体外冲击波碎石术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片的转归
J Endourol. 1993 Dec;7(6):453-6. doi: 10.1089/end.1993.7.453.
7
Are small residual stone fragments really insignificant in children?小儿结石残留碎片真的无关紧要吗?
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Apr;48(4):840-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.07.061.
8
Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: an update.体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石:最新进展
Eur Urol. 2001 Feb;39(2):187-99. doi: 10.1159/000052435.
9
Does further extracorporeal lithotripsy promote clearance of small residual fragments?进一步的体外冲击波碎石术是否能促进小残留结石碎片的清除?
Br J Urol. 1991 Dec;68(6):565-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15415.x.
10
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上肾结石密度 970 亨氏单位(HU)的阈值可改善患者对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)的选择:来自前瞻性研究的证据。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of effectiveness and safety between tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and negative pressure combined with retrograde intrarenal surgery for 2 to 3 cm renal stones.无管经皮肾镜取石术与负压联合逆行肾内手术治疗2至3厘米肾结石的有效性和安全性比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 29;104(35):e44291. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044291.
2
Expanding urolithiasis treatment: comparison of super pulsed thulium laser and holmium:YAG laser for ureteral stone management.拓展尿路结石治疗:超脉冲铥激光与钬激光治疗输尿管结石的比较
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 12;30(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02591-7.
3
Comparison of two negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with day-case flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones randomized trial.
两种负压输尿管导入鞘联合日间门诊软性输尿管镜治疗肾结石的随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 23;14(1):29092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80934-w.
4
International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus on miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy.国际尿石症联盟(IAU)关于微创经皮肾镜取石术的共识。
Mil Med Res. 2024 Oct 28;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00562-3.
5
International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) guideline on staghorn calculi management.国际尿石症联盟(IAU)鹿角结石管理指南。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 25;42(1):189. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04816-6.
6
Comparison of the effectiveness of two adjustable negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with flex ureteroscopy for ≤ 2 cm renal stones.比较两种可调式负压器管鞘联合软镜治疗 ≤ 2 cm 肾结石的效果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 27;14(1):4745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55333-w.
7
The fate of clinically insignificant residual fragments following retrograde intrarenal surgery and factors affecting spontaneous passage.逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)后临床意义不大的残余碎片的命运及影响自发排出的因素。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Feb 28;52(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01544-9.
8
The significance of clinically insignificant residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis into the relevance of complete stone clearance.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后临床无意义残余碎片的意义:完全结石清除相关性的分析。
World J Urol. 2024 Feb 14;42(1):78. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04774-z.
9
What is the safe and effective dilator number during access in PCNL? Three-shot dilation versus classical sequential Amplatz dilation.经皮肾镜取石术中安全有效的扩张器数量是多少?三枪扩张与经典序贯 Amplatz 扩张比较。
BMC Urol. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01368-6.
10
Flexible ureteroscopy with novel flexible ureteral access sheath versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of 2-3 cm renal stones.新型可弯曲输尿管鞘的可弯曲输尿管镜检查与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗2-3厘米肾结石的比较
Int J Urol. 2024 Mar;31(3):281-286. doi: 10.1111/iju.15347. Epub 2023 Nov 28.