• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用EDAP LT-01碎石机进行体外冲击波碎石术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片的转归

Fate of clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with EDAP LT-01 lithotripter.

作者信息

Moon Y T, Kim S C

机构信息

Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Endourol. 1993 Dec;7(6):453-6. doi: 10.1089/end.1993.7.453.

DOI:10.1089/end.1993.7.453
PMID:8124335
Abstract

The stone-free rate of 248 cases of clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) was 32.7% by 1 month, 73.0% by 3 months, and 92.7% by 6 months of follow-up. The stone-free rate decreased but not remarkably in accordance with the increment of the caliceal dilatation (92.9%, 94.9%, 85.7%, and 83.3% for no, mild, moderate, and severe dilatation, respectively) by 6 months of follow-up. The clearance of the CIRF was not influenced by their location, the pelviocaliceal angle, the infundibular length, or the number of the lower calices. Of 16 patients who had residual stone fragments at 6 months and underwent an additional session of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), 12 became stone free by another 6 months of follow-up. Therefore, it is desirable to wait for clearance of CIRF for at least 6 months before offering further treatment, regardless of their location and anatomic variation of the calices containing CIRF. Repeated SWL, even for stone fragments of 3 to 4 mm in diameter found initially 1 month after the last session of SWL, might promote clearance of the CIRF, and additional SWL for persistent CIRF could be an appropriate adjunctive measure.

摘要

248例临床意义不大的残余结石碎片(CIRF)患者,随访1个月时结石清除率为32.7%,3个月时为73.0%,6个月时为92.7%。随访6个月时,结石清除率随肾盏扩张程度增加而降低,但降幅不显著(无扩张、轻度扩张、中度扩张和重度扩张患者的结石清除率分别为92.9%、94.9%、85.7%和83.3%)。CIRF的清除不受其位置、肾盂肾盏角、漏斗部长度或下肾盏数量的影响。16例6个月时仍有残余结石碎片并接受了额外一次体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)的患者,在随后6个月的随访中有12例结石清除。因此,无论CIRF的位置以及包含CIRF的肾盏的解剖变异情况如何,在提供进一步治疗前,最好等待至少6个月以观察CIRF是否清除。即使是在上次SWL术后1个月最初发现的直径3至4 mm的结石碎片,重复进行SWL也可能促进CIRF的清除,对持续存在的CIRF进行额外的SWL可能是一种合适的辅助措施。

相似文献

1
Fate of clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with EDAP LT-01 lithotripter.使用EDAP LT-01碎石机进行体外冲击波碎石术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片的转归
J Endourol. 1993 Dec;7(6):453-6. doi: 10.1089/end.1993.7.453.
2
Does further extracorporeal lithotripsy promote clearance of small residual fragments?进一步的体外冲击波碎石术是否能促进小残留结石碎片的清除?
Br J Urol. 1991 Dec;68(6):565-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15415.x.
3
5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片患者的5年随访
Eur Urol. 2005 Jun;47(6):860-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.01.005. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
4
Radiographic anatomical factors do not predict clearance of lower caliceal calculus by shock-wave lithotripsy.影像学解剖因素无法预测冲击波碎石术治疗下盏结石的结石清除情况。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(3):226-9. doi: 10.1080/00365590510007748.
5
Evaluation of the effects of relationships between main spatial lower pole calyceal anatomic factors on the success of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with lower pole kidney stones.评估下极肾盏主要空间解剖学因素之间的关系对下极肾结石患者冲击波碎石术成功率的影响。
Urology. 2008 May;71(5):801-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.052. Epub 2008 Feb 15.
6
The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.肾盂肾盏解剖结构对小儿下极结石冲击波碎石术后结石清除的影响。
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1082-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000135670.83076.5c.
7
Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术后机械叩击、利尿及倒立法辅助下极肾结石排出的随机对照研究
Urology. 2005 Jun;65(6):1070-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.045.
8
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones in abnormal urinary tracts: analysis of results and comparison with normal urinary tracts.体外冲击波碎石术治疗异常尿路结石:结果分析及与正常尿路的比较
J Endourol. 2001 Sep;15(7):681-5. doi: 10.1089/08927790152596235.
9
The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones.冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗中等大小(10 - 20毫米)肾结石的成效。
Urolithiasis. 2016 Oct;44(5):441-4. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0857-2. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
10
SWL: our twenty-four year experience.体外冲击波碎石术:我们的24年经验
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2008 Mar;80(1):21-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Follow-up of urolithiasis patients after treatment: an algorithm from the EAU Urolithiasis Panel.尿路结石患者治疗后的随访:欧洲泌尿外科学会尿路结石专家组的一项算法
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 28;42(1):202. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04872-y.
2
GeoBioMed perspectives on kidney stone recurrence from the reactive surface area of SWL-derived particles.从 SWL 衍生颗粒的反应表面积看 GeoBioMed 对肾结石复发的观点。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 1;12(1):18371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23331-5.
3
Medium-term follow-up of clinically insignificant residual fragments after minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prognostic features and risk factors.
微创经皮肾镜取石术后临床无意义残留碎片的中期随访:预后特征及危险因素
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):21664-8. eCollection 2015.
4
How do the residual fragments after SWL affect the health-related quality of life? A critical analysis in a size-based manner.体外冲击波碎石术后的残留碎片如何影响与健康相关的生活质量?基于大小的批判性分析。
Urolithiasis. 2015 Apr;43(2):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0727-3. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
5
Clinically insignificant residual fragments after flexible ureterorenoscopy: medium-term follow-up results.软性输尿管肾镜检查术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片:中期随访结果
Urolithiasis. 2014 Dec;42(6):533-8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0691-y. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
6
Management of Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments following Shock Wave Lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术后临床意义不显著的残留碎片的处理
Adv Urol. 2012;2012:320104. doi: 10.1155/2012/320104. Epub 2012 May 31.