Department of Psychology, Arcadia University, Glenside, Pennsylvania.
Stress Health. 2019 Apr;35(2):211-216. doi: 10.1002/smi.2847. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
In this short communication, we investigated the relations of daily coping, mood, and quality of life in college students (n = 74) over seven consecutive days (n = 510). Specifically, we tested whether four types of daily coping (problem-focused engagement, problem-focused disengagement, emotion-focused engagement, and emotion-focused disengagement) were associated with three aspects of daily functioning (negative mood, positive mood, and quality of life). In a single multilevel multivariate regression model, we examined the day-to-day relations of the four coping strategies with mood and quality of life, while controlling for perceived stress. Results largely supported our hypotheses, such that problem-focused engagement was linked to lower negative mood and higher positive mood and quality of daily life, whereas the three other types of coping were negatively related or unrelated to daily functioning. These findings provide support for the benefits of problem-focused engagement in coping with everyday stressors of life as a college student, and implications for psychotherapy and counselling are discussed.
在这篇简短的交流中，我们在七天内（n=510）调查了大学生（n=74）日常应对、情绪和生活质量之间的关系。具体来说，我们测试了四种类型的日常应对方式（问题聚焦参与、问题聚焦解脱、情绪聚焦参与和情绪聚焦解脱）是否与日常生活的三个方面（负面情绪、正面情绪和生活质量）相关。在一个单一的多层次多元回归模型中，我们检验了四种应对策略与情绪和生活质量的日常关系，同时控制了感知压力。结果在很大程度上支持了我们的假设，即问题聚焦参与与较低的负面情绪和较高的正面情绪和生活质量相关，而其他三种应对方式则与日常功能无关或负相关。这些发现为问题聚焦参与作为一种应对大学生日常生活压力的方法提供了支持，并且讨论了对心理治疗和咨询的启示。
