Olson Emily M, Kramer Renee D, Gibson Crystal, Wautlet Cynthia K, Schmuhl Nicholas B, Ehrenthal Deborah B
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Department of Population Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
WMJ. 2018 Oct;117(4):149-155.
Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC), specifically implants and intrauterine devices (IUD), are highly effective, low maintenance forms of birth control. Practice guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Academy of Family Physicians, and American Academy of Pediatrics recommend that LARC be considered first-line birth control for most women; however, uptake remains low. In this study, we sought to understand practices and barriers to provision of LARC in routine and immediate postpartum settings as they differ between specialties.
We surveyed 3,000 Wisconsin physicians and advanced-practice providers in obstetrics-gynecology/women's health (Ob-gyn), family medicine, pediatrics, and midwifery to assess practices and barriers (56.5% response rate). This analysis is comprised of contraceptive care providers (n=992); statistical significance was tested using chi-square and 2-sample proportions tests.
More providers working Ob-gyn (94.3%) and midwifery (78.7%) were skilled providers of LARC methods than those in family medicine (42.5%) and pediatrics (6.6%) ( < .0001). Lack of insertion skill was the most-cited barrier to routine provision among family medicine (31.1%) and pediatric (72.1%) providers. Among prenatal/delivery providers, over 50% across all specialties reported lack of device availability on-site as a barrier to immediate postpartum LARC provision; organizational practices also were commonly reported barriers.
Gaps in routine and immediate postpartum LARC practice were strongly related to specialty, and providers' experience heightened barriers to immediate postpartum compared to routine insertion. Skills training targeting family medicine and pediatric providers would enable broader access to LARC. Organizational barriers to immediate postpartum LARC provision impact many providers.
长效可逆避孕方法(LARC),特别是皮下埋植剂和宫内节育器(IUD),是高效、低维护的避孕方式。美国妇产科医师学会、美国家庭医师学会和美国儿科学会的实践指南建议,LARC应被视为大多数女性的一线避孕方法;然而,其使用率仍然较低。在本研究中,我们试图了解在常规和产后即刻环境中提供LARC的做法及障碍,因为不同专业之间存在差异。
我们对威斯康星州3000名妇产科/妇女健康、家庭医学、儿科学和助产领域的医生及高级执业提供者进行了调查,以评估其做法及障碍(回复率为56.5%)。本分析包括避孕护理提供者(n = 992);使用卡方检验和双样本比例检验来检验统计学显著性。
与家庭医学(42.5%)和儿科学(6.6%)的提供者相比,更多从事妇产科(94.3%)和助产工作(78.7%)的提供者是LARC方法的熟练提供者(P <.0001)。缺乏插入技能是家庭医学(31.1%)和儿科学(72.1%)提供者常规提供LARC时最常提到的障碍。在产前/分娩提供者中,所有专业超过50%的人报告称现场缺乏器械可及性是产后即刻提供LARC的障碍;组织层面的做法也普遍被报告为障碍。
常规和产后即刻LARC实践中的差距与专业密切相关,与常规插入相比,提供者的经验增加了产后即刻提供LARC的障碍。针对家庭医学和儿科学提供者的技能培训将使更多人能够使用LARC。产后即刻提供LARC的组织障碍影响了许多提供者。