Suppr超能文献

前瞻性评估小潮气量通气治疗急性呼吸衰竭患者的可行性试验。

Prospective Assessment of the Feasibility of a Trial of Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation for Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure.

机构信息

1 Intermountain Medical Center and.

2 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Mar;16(3):356-362. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201807-459OC.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Low-tidal volume ventilation (LTVV; 6 ml/kg) benefits patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and may aid those with other causes of respiratory failure. Current early ventilation practices are poorly defined.

OBJECTIVES

We observed patients with acute respiratory failure to assess the feasibility of a pragmatic trial of LTVV and to guide experimental design.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with acute respiratory failure admitted to intensive care units expected to participate in the proposed trial. We collected clinical data as well as information on initial and daily ventilator settings and inpatient mortality. We estimated the benefit of LTVV using predictive linear and nonlinear models. We simulated models to estimate power and feasibility of a cluster-randomized trial of LTVV versus usual care in acute respiratory failure.

RESULTS

We included 2,484 newly mechanically ventilated patients (31% with acute respiratory distress syndrome) from 49 hospitals. Hospital mortality was 28%. Mean initial tidal volume was 7.1 ml/kg predicted body weight (95% confidence interval, 7.1-7.2), with 78% of patients receiving tidal volumes less than or equal to 8 ml/kg. Our models estimated a mortality benefit of 0-2% from LTVV compared with usual care. Simulation of a stepped-wedged cluster-randomized trial suggested that enrollment of 106,361 patients would be necessary to achieve greater than 90% power.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of initial tidal volumes less than 8 ml/kg predicted body weight was common at hospitals participating in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury (PETAL) Network. After considering the size and budgetary requirement for a cluster-randomized trial of LTVV versus usual care in acute respiratory failure, the PETAL Network deemed the proposed trial infeasible. A rapid observational study and simulations to model anticipated power may help better design trials.

摘要

背景

低潮气量通气(LTVV;6ml/kg)有益于急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者,并可能有助于其他原因引起的呼吸衰竭患者。目前早期通气实践的定义较差。

目的

我们观察急性呼吸衰竭患者,以评估 LTVV 实用临床试验的可行性,并指导实验设计。

方法

我们前瞻性地招募了预计将参加拟议试验的重症监护病房急性呼吸衰竭的连续患者。我们收集了临床数据以及初始和每日呼吸机设置和住院患者死亡率的信息。我们使用预测线性和非线性模型来估计 LTVV 的益处。我们模拟模型,以估计急性呼吸衰竭中 LTVV 与常规护理的集群随机试验的功效和可行性。

结果

我们纳入了来自 49 家医院的 2484 名新机械通气患者(31%为急性呼吸窘迫综合征)。医院死亡率为 28%。初始潮气量平均为预测体重的 7.1ml/kg(95%置信区间,7.1-7.2),78%的患者接受的潮气量小于或等于 8ml/kg。我们的模型估计与常规护理相比,LTVV 可降低 0-2%的死亡率。模拟一个逐步楔形集群随机试验表明,需要招募 106361 名患者才能达到大于 90%的功效。

结论

参与国立心肺血液研究所预防和早期治疗急性肺损伤(PETAL)网络的医院普遍使用初始潮气量低于预测体重的 8ml/kg。在考虑急性呼吸衰竭中 LTVV 与常规护理的集群随机试验的规模和预算要求后,PETAL 网络认为拟议的试验不可行。一项快速观察性研究和模拟预期功效的模型可能有助于更好地设计试验。

相似文献

10
Initial mechanical ventilator settings and lung protective ventilation in the ED.急诊科初始机械通气设置与肺保护性通气
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;34(8):1446-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.04.027. Epub 2016 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

6
What's to Be Found in the Wisdom of the Crowd?群体智慧中能发现什么?
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Dec;18(12):1957-1959. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202105-574ED.

本文引用的文献

4
Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful.为何大多数临床研究并无用处。
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 21;13(6):e1002049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049. eCollection 2016 Jun.
8
Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trial.阶梯楔形试验的样本量计算
Trials. 2015 Aug 17;16:354. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0840-9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验