Hoffman Matthew R, Scholp Austin J, Hedberg Calvin D, Lamb Jim R, Braden Maia N, McMurray J Scott, Jiang Jack J
Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2019 Jul;129(7):1520-1526. doi: 10.1002/lary.27418. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Phonation threshold pressure (PTP), the minimum subglottal pressure (P ) required for phonation, is sensitive to changes in laryngeal biomechanics and is often elevated with pathology. Little is reported on PTP in children; challenges with task performance and measurement reliability represent barriers to routine clinical assessment.
Pilot study evaluating PTP and P measurement reliability in children using labial and mechanical interruption.
Twenty-two subjects aged 4 to 17 years (10.7 ± 3.9 years) participated. Ten trials were performed for each method; task order was randomized. For labial interruption, subjects produced /pα/ five times at softest (onset PTP) and comfortable amplitude. For mechanical interruption, subjects produced a sustained /α/ while a balloon valve interrupted phonation five times for 250 ms each; mechanical interruption was performed with a mouthpiece and mask. PTP was recorded as the difference between P and supraglottal pressure at phonation cessation (offset PTP). Mean PTP and P and intrasubject coefficients of variation were compared. Correlations with age were evaluated.
Mean PTP (P < .001) and P (P = .005) were higher for labial interruption. Intrasubject coefficients of variation for PTP (P = .554) and P (P = .305) were similar across methods. Coefficient of variation was related to age for mechanical-mask trials only (r = -0.628, P = .00175).
Differences in means are likely related to differences in task and PTP hysteresis effect. Reliability is comparable with all methods; using a mouthpiece may be preferable to a mask for mechanical interruption. Measurement of PTP is noninvasive, reliable, and may be a useful adjunct in pediatric voice assessment.
3b Laryngoscope, 129:1520-1526, 2019.
目的/假设:发声阈压力(PTP)是发声所需的最小声门下压力(P),对喉生物力学变化敏感,且常因病理情况而升高。关于儿童PTP的报道较少;任务执行和测量可靠性方面的挑战是常规临床评估的障碍。
一项初步研究,评估使用唇部阻断和机械阻断法测量儿童PTP及P的可靠性。
22名年龄在4至17岁(平均10.7±3.9岁)的受试者参与。每种方法进行10次试验;任务顺序随机。对于唇部阻断,受试者以最轻柔(起始PTP)和舒适的振幅发出/pα/五次。对于机械阻断,受试者发出持续的/α/,同时一个气囊阀每次中断发声250毫秒,共五次;机械阻断通过咬嘴和面罩进行。PTP记录为发声停止时P与声门上压力之间的差值(终止PTP)。比较平均PTP、P及受试者内变异系数。评估与年龄的相关性。
唇部阻断的平均PTP(P<0.001)和P(P = 0.005)较高。两种方法的PTP受试者内变异系数(P = 0.554)和P受试者内变异系数(P = 0.305)相似。仅在机械面罩试验中,变异系数与年龄相关(r = -0.628,P = 0.00175)。
均值差异可能与任务差异和PTP滞后效应有关。所有方法的可靠性相当;机械阻断时使用咬嘴可能比面罩更可取。PTP测量是非侵入性的、可靠的,可能是儿科嗓音评估的有用辅助手段。
3b 《喉镜》,2019年,第129卷,第1520 - 1526页