Clearway Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Cancer Prevention & Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States of America; Westat, 1600 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850, United States of America.
Prev Med. 2019 Jan;118:226-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
As cigarette smoking rates decline, an important policy question is whether increasing cigarette taxes will continue to encourage smoking cessation. We tested this question following recent tobacco tax increases. Data were from the Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey, a serial cross-sectional telephone survey conducted statewide, and was limited to past-year cigarette smokers in 2010 (n = 1029) and 2014 (n = 1382). Weighted estimates were calculated of the prevalence of past year smokers, smokers who attempted to quit smoking, and those who successfully quit by demographics, tobacco use, use of evidence-based cessation assistance to quit, and smoker perceptions of the tax increases. Among past year smokers, almost 60% reported a quit attempt in both years, 12.8% successfully quit in 2010 and 15.6% in 2014. Although older age, daily smoking, mean cigarettes per day, and more days of e-cigarette use, were associated with quit attempts in unadjusted models, only the perceived tax increase effect (AOR = 8.9; 95% CI 6.3-12.5) and low nicotine dependence (AOR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.7) were associated with making a quit attempt in adjusted models. Successful 12-month quits were predicted by college education (AOR = 3.2, 95% CI 1.3-7.8), the use of cessation support (AOR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.6), and reporting the tax increase helped maintain a quit (AOR = 12.3, 95% CI 7.5-20.1). These findings suggest that a large tax increase is effective in promoting quitting even in the presence of strong tobacco control measures such as indoor smoking bans and other smoking restrictions, mass media campaigns, and universal access to cessation support.
随着吸烟率的下降,一个重要的政策问题是提高香烟税是否会继续鼓励戒烟。我们在最近提高烟草税后检验了这个问题。数据来自明尼苏达州成人烟草调查,这是一项在全州范围内进行的连续横断面电话调查,仅限于 2010 年(n=1029)和 2014 年(n=1382)的过去一年的吸烟者。根据人口统计学、烟草使用、使用基于证据的戒烟辅助工具、吸烟者对税收增加的看法等因素,计算了过去一年吸烟者、试图戒烟的吸烟者和成功戒烟的吸烟者的比例。在过去一年的吸烟者中,近 60%的人在这两年都报告了戒烟尝试,2010 年有 12.8%的人成功戒烟,2014 年有 15.6%的人成功戒烟。尽管在未调整模型中,年龄较大、每天吸烟、平均每天吸烟量和更多的电子烟使用天数与戒烟尝试有关,但只有感知到的税收增加效应(AOR=8.9;95%CI 6.3-12.5)和低尼古丁依赖(AOR=1.9;95%CI 1.3-2.7)与调整模型中的戒烟尝试有关。在调整模型中,12 个月的成功戒烟与大学教育(AOR=3.2;95%CI 1.3-7.8)、使用戒烟支持(AOR=2.1;95%CI 1.3-3.6)和报告税收增加有助于保持戒烟状态(AOR=12.3;95%CI 7.5-20.1)有关。这些发现表明,即使在室内禁烟和其他吸烟限制、大众媒体宣传和普遍获得戒烟支持等强有力的烟草控制措施存在的情况下,大幅提高香烟税也能有效地促进戒烟。