Suppr超能文献

变应性支气管肺曲霉病和真菌过敏试验的评论

Critique of trials in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and fungal allergy.

作者信息

Moss Richard B

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary Medicine and Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, , USA.

出版信息

Med Mycol. 2006 Sep 1;44(Supplement_1):S269-S272. doi: 10.1080/13693780600835757.

Abstract

Treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) emerged from uncontrolled published series of patients on prolonged oral glucocorticosteroids. Oral steroids remain the mainstay of treatment, but dose regime and duration have never been standardized. Oral steroids are problematic due to frequency of relapse, lack of steroid action on airway fungal burden and toxicities. Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials of inhaled corticosteroids (n=1) or oral itraconazole (n=2) in patients with asthma and ABPA have shown efficacy for the latter drug only. Itraconazole is an effective steroid-sparing agent with anti-inflammatory aspects. Use of inhaled budesonide with itraconazole can lead to adrenal suppression due to inhibition of hepatic cytochrome P450. Despite combined use of oral steroids and itraconazole in ABPA, relapses and steroid dependence or toxicity have led to examination of alternative agents in uncontrolled case reports and series. Reports of nebulized amphotericin B in several patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and ABPA suggest a potential benefit. Voriconazole has also been used with some success but also some toxicity. Both itraconazole and voriconazole have also been used in some CF-ABPA patients as monotherapy with mixed results. A recent report described treatment of refractory CF-ABPA with monthly high-dose intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone, also with mixed results. No controlled trials of voriconazole, inhaled amphotericin, or IV pulse steroids have been published. Future studies should focus on controlled trials of antifungal and immunomodulatory agents since conventional steroid therapy remains problematic.

摘要

变应性支气管肺曲霉病(ABPA)的治疗源于对接受长期口服糖皮质激素治疗患者的非对照公开系列研究。口服类固醇仍然是主要的治疗方法,但剂量方案和疗程从未标准化。由于复发频率、类固醇对气道真菌负荷缺乏作用以及毒性问题,口服类固醇存在问题。在哮喘合并ABPA患者中进行的吸入性糖皮质激素(n = 1)或口服伊曲康唑(n = 2)的前瞻性随机双盲安慰剂对照试验仅显示后者药物有效。伊曲康唑是一种具有抗炎作用的有效类固醇节省剂。吸入布地奈德与伊曲康唑联合使用可能会因抑制肝细胞色素P450而导致肾上腺抑制。尽管在ABPA中联合使用了口服类固醇和伊曲康唑,但复发以及类固醇依赖或毒性导致在非对照病例报告和系列研究中对替代药物进行了研究。在几例囊性纤维化(CF)合并ABPA患者中使用雾化两性霉素B的报告表明可能有益。伏立康唑也已使用并取得了一些成功,但也存在一些毒性。伊曲康唑和伏立康唑在一些CF-ABPA患者中也作为单一疗法使用,结果不一。最近的一份报告描述了用每月大剂量静脉注射(IV)甲泼尼龙治疗难治性CF-ABPA,结果也不一。尚未发表关于伏立康唑、吸入性两性霉素或静脉脉冲类固醇的对照试验。由于传统的类固醇疗法仍然存在问题,未来的研究应侧重于抗真菌和免疫调节药物的对照试验。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验