Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Asian J Androl. 2019 Mar-Apr;21(2):170-176. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_89_18.
Pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) is the most common conservative management for urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, whether the PFME guided by a therapist (G-PFME) can contribute to the recovery of urinary continence for patients after RP is still controversial. We performed this meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of G-PFME on UI after RP and to explore whether the additional preoperative G-PFME is superior to postoperative G-PFME alone. Literature search was conducted on Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed, to obtain all relevant randomized controlled trials published before March 1, 2018. Outcome data were pooled and analyzed with Review Manager 5.3 to compare the continence rates of G-PFME with control and to compare additional preoperative G-PFME with postoperative G-PFME. Twenty-two articles with 2647 patients were included. The continence rates of G-PFME were all superior to control at different follow-up time points, with the odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 2.79 (1.53-5.07), 2.80 (1.87-4.19), 2.93 (1.19-7.22), 4.11 (2.24-7.55), and 2.41 (1.33-4.36) at 1 month, 3 months, 4 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery, respectively. However, there was no difference between additional preoperative G-PFME and postoperative G-PFME, with the OR (95% CI) of 1.70 (0.56-5.11) and 1.35 (0.41-4.40) at 1 month and 3 months after RP, respectively. G-PFME could improve the recovery of urinary continence at both early and long-term stages. Starting the PFME preoperatively might not produce extra benefits for patients at early stage, compared with postoperative PFME.
盆腔底肌肉运动(PFME)是根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后治疗尿失禁(UI)最常用的保守治疗方法。然而,由治疗师指导的 PFME(G-PFME)是否有助于 RP 后患者尿控的恢复仍存在争议。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以研究 G-PFME 对 RP 后 UI 的有效性,并探讨术前额外的 G-PFME 是否优于单独的术后 G-PFME。我们在 Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Web of Science 和 PubMed 上进行了文献检索,以获取截至 2018 年 3 月 1 日之前发表的所有相关随机对照试验。使用 Review Manager 5.3 汇总和分析了结局数据,以比较 G-PFME 与对照组的尿控率,并比较术前额外的 G-PFME 与术后 G-PFME 的尿控率。纳入了 22 篇文章,共 2647 名患者。在不同的随访时间点,G-PFME 的尿控率均优于对照组,优势比(OR)(95%置信区间[CI])分别为 2.79(1.53-5.07)、2.80(1.87-4.19)、2.93(1.19-7.22)、4.11(2.24-7.55)和 2.41(1.33-4.36)在术后 1 个月、3 个月、4 个月、6 个月和 12 个月时。然而,术前额外的 G-PFME 与术后 G-PFME 之间没有差异,OR(95%CI)分别为 1.70(0.56-5.11)和 1.35(0.41-4.40)在 RP 后 1 个月和 3 个月时。G-PFME 可以改善早期和长期的尿控恢复。与术后 PFME 相比,术前开始 PFME 可能不会在早期为患者带来额外的益处。