Tong Jin Hui, Hu Ye Cui, Du Zhang Liu, Zuo Yu Qiang, Li Yu Ying
School of Land Science and Technique, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.
Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Sep;29(9):2890-2896. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201809.019.
Land use change is an important factor affecting soil carbon and nitrogen cycle, and this is a hot spot in the study of global climate change. Based on the fixed depth method (FD) and the equivalent mass method (ESM), we explored the effects of land use change on soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) storage from the perspectives of forest reclamation and farmland vegetation restoration in Karst area. The storage of SOC and TN significantly decreased after the fore-sts were converted to grassland, eucalyptus and farmland. On average, the SOC and TN losses calculated by the FD method were 47.4% and 41.6%, respectively, the losses of SOC and TN calculated by ESM method were 54.8% and 49.7%. The SOC and TN storage increased significantly after abandonment of farmland to grassland or planting eucalyptus. On average, the SOC and TN stocks calculated based on the FD method increased by 60.5% and 49.7%, while the SOC and TN calculated by the ESM method increased by 85.5% and 70.8% respectively. The difference between FD method and ESM method was analyzed, it was concluded that FD method ignored the difference of soil bulk density after land use change. Soil bulk density was significantly increased after forest destruction. The loss of SOC and TN storage was overestimated by the FD method. Soil bulk density decreased after vegetation restoration, FD method will underestimate the enhancement of SOC and TN storage. It is suggested that the ESM method should be used to estimate the impacts of land use change on SOC and TN storage.
土地利用变化是影响土壤碳氮循环的重要因素,也是全球气候变化研究的热点。基于固定深度法(FD)和等效质量法(ESM),我们从喀斯特地区森林开垦和农田植被恢复的角度,探讨了土地利用变化对土壤有机碳(SOC)和全氮(TN)储量的影响。森林转变为草地、桉树和农田后,SOC和TN储量显著下降。平均而言,FD法计算的SOC和TN损失分别为47.4%和41.6%,ESM法计算的SOC和TN损失分别为54.8%和49.7%。农田弃耕为草地或种植桉树后,SOC和TN储量显著增加。平均而言,基于FD法计算的SOC和TN储量分别增加了60.5%和49.7%,而ESM法计算的SOC和TN分别增加了85.5%和70.8%。分析了FD法与ESM法的差异,得出FD法忽略了土地利用变化后土壤容重的差异。森林破坏后土壤容重显著增加,FD法高估了SOC和TN储量的损失。植被恢复后土壤容重降低,FD法会低估SOC和TN储量的增加。建议采用ESM法估算土地利用变化对SOC和TN储量的影响。