Wilbush J
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Maturitas. 1988 May;10(1):5-26. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(88)90127-2.
Excessive premenopausal uterine bleeding, whether an exaggeration of catamenial loss or more severe haemorrhage, has until lately been part of traditional climacteric symptomatology, yet it is no longer so. This, and a parallel article, attempt to find out the reasons for the lapse of this symptom. The present paper concentrates on the literature of the 18-19th century, generously quoting selected sources, in an effort to define the context in which this symptom became so prominent, the explanations offered by and the approach of contemporaries to it. The Classical ideas concerning the menses and their cessation, briefly outlined, were challenged during the 18th century by a few individuals who attempted to ascertain the facts for themselves and establish what was the actual course of nature. They were helped in this by the presence of differing cultural subgroups with completely different climacteric experiences. The conviction then arose that medications given upper class women were iatrogenically responsible for the complications they experienced. When menorrhagia continued the lifestyle of these ladies was blamed. Despite all corrections, however, menorrhagia persisted. This review then examines, with varying detail, some of the writings of these two centuries, offering some glimpses into a literature otherwise not easily accessible.
绝经前子宫出血过多,无论是月经出血量的增加还是更严重的出血,直到最近一直是传统更年期症状学的一部分,但现在已不再如此。本文以及另一篇相关文章试图找出这种症状不再存在的原因。本文聚焦于18至19世纪的文献,大量引用了精选的资料来源,试图界定这种症状变得如此突出的背景、当时人们给出的解释以及应对方法。简要概述了关于月经及其停止的古典观念,在18世纪,一些人试图亲自查明事实并确定自然的实际过程,从而对这些观念提出了挑战。不同文化亚群体有着完全不同的更年期经历,这对他们有所帮助。当时人们开始坚信,上流社会女性所服用的药物是导致她们出现并发症的医源性原因。当月经过多持续时,这些女性的生活方式受到指责。然而,尽管进行了各种修正,月经过多仍然存在。然后,这篇综述以不同的详细程度审视了这两个世纪的一些著作,让人得以一窥那些 otherwise not easily accessible 的文献。