Department of Emergency Medicine (AB Sarvis, JM Chamberlain, and DJ Mathison), Children's National Health System, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Economics Department (RC Sarvis), George Mason University, Fairfax, Va.
Acad Pediatr. 2019 Mar;19(2):209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
Ninety percent of infants 29 to 60 days old presenting to the emergency department with fever and urinary tract infection are admitted due to fear of concomitant bacteremia. Many of these infants are at low risk for bacteremia and can be safely discharged with no heightened risk of adverse events. This study sought to estimate the potential savings from outpatient management of low-risk infants.
A comparative cost analysis was performed using bacteremia probability estimates from a previously published prediction model. We estimated costs using a national pediatric database coupled with retrospective chart review of infants who presented to our emergency department between 2011 and 2015.
The relative cost savings for the discharge strategy were $80,333 ($19,127 vs $99,460; 80% savings) for each patient with bacteremia and $257,073 per 100 patients overall. Similar savings were found for charges-$304,949 ($71,421 vs $376,371; 80%) for each patient with bacteremia and $975,838 per 100 patients. Our institutional reimbursements provided an estimated savings of $148,924 ($73,280 vs. $222,204; 67%) and $476,533 per 100 patients overall.
The relative cost savings from discharging rather than admitting low-risk infants with febrile urinary tract infection were significant, even accounting for expenditures associated with the return emergency room visit of initially discharged bacteremic patients. These savings are achievable without an increase in adverse events. Similar outcomes were demonstrated for hospital charges and reimbursements, further strengthening these results. This study emphasizes how risk stratification in clinical decision-making can lead to substantial cost savings without compromising patient outcomes.
90% 的 29-60 天大龄婴儿因担心合并菌血症而在急诊科出现发热和尿路感染时被收治入院。这些婴儿中许多处于低危状态,可安全出院,而无不良事件风险增加。本研究旨在评估门诊管理低危婴儿的潜在节省。
采用先前发表的预测模型进行菌血症概率估计,进行成本比较分析。我们使用全国儿科数据库进行成本估算,并对 2011 年至 2015 年期间在我院急诊科就诊的婴儿进行回顾性图表审查。
对于每例菌血症患者,该出院策略的相对节省成本为 80333 美元(19127 美元与 99460 美元;80%的节省),对于每 100 例患者,总节省成本为 257073 美元。对于收费,也发现了类似的节省——每例菌血症患者节省 304949 美元(71421 美元与 376371 美元;80%),每 100 例患者的总节省成本为 975838 美元。我院报销提供了估计节省 148924 美元(73280 美元与 222204 美元;67%)和 476533 美元,每 100 例患者。
从低危婴儿发热性尿路感染中出院而不是收治的相对成本节省是显著的,即使考虑到初始出院菌血症患者返回急诊室就诊的相关支出。这些节省是在不增加不良事件的情况下实现的。对于医院收费和报销,也得到了类似的结果,进一步加强了这些结果。本研究强调了在临床决策中进行风险分层如何在不影响患者结果的情况下带来显著的成本节省。