Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Med Genet. 2018 Dec;55(12):794-802. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105565. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
and () variants classified ambiguously as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are a major challenge for clinical genetic testing in breast cancer; their relevance to the cancer risk is unclear and the association with the response to specific -targeted agents is uncertain. To minimise the proportion of VUS in , we performed the multifactorial likelihood analysis and validated this method using an independent cohort of patients with breast cancer.
We used a data set of 2115 patients with breast cancer from the nationwide multicentre prospective Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer study. In total, 83 VUSs (, n=26; , n=57) were analysed. The multifactorial probability was estimated by combining the prior probability with the overall likelihood ratio derived from co-occurrence of each VUS with pathogenic variants, personal and family history, and tumour characteristics. The classification was compared with the interpretation according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines. An external validation was conducted using independent data set of 810 patients.
We were able to redefine 38 VUSs (, n=10; , n=28). The revised classification was highly correlated with the ACMG/AMP guideline-based interpretation (, p for trend=0.015; , p=0.001). Our approach reduced the proportion of VUS from 19% (154/810) to 8.9% (72/810) in the retrospective validation data set.
The classification in this study would minimise the 'uncertainty' in clinical interpretation, and this validated multifactorial model can be used for the reliable annotation of VUSs.
和 () 变体被模糊地归类为意义不明的变体 (VUS),这是乳腺癌临床基因检测的主要挑战;它们与癌症风险的相关性尚不清楚,与特定靶向药物的反应相关性也不确定。为了将 VUS 的比例降到最低,我们进行了多因素似然分析,并使用乳腺癌患者的独立队列验证了这种方法。
我们使用了来自全国多中心前瞻性韩国遗传性乳腺癌研究的 2115 名乳腺癌患者的数据集。总共分析了 83 个 VUS(,n=26;,n=57)。通过将先验概率与从每个 VUS 与致病性变异、个人和家族史以及肿瘤特征的共同发生中得出的总体似然比相结合,来估计多因素概率。分类与根据美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会/分子病理学协会 (ACMG/AMP) 指南的解释进行了比较。使用 810 名患者的独立数据集进行了外部验证。
我们能够重新定义 38 个 VUS(,n=10;,n=28)。修订后的分类与 ACMG/AMP 指南解释高度相关(,p 趋势=0.015;,p=0.001)。我们的方法将回顾性验证数据集中 VUS 的比例从 19%(154/810)降低到 8.9%(72/810)。
本研究中的分类将最大限度地减少临床解释中的“不确定性”,并且这种经过验证的多因素模型可用于可靠地注释 VUS。