• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在韩国遗传性乳腺癌前瞻性研究中分析意义未明的 BRCA1/2 变异体。

Analysis of BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance in the prospective Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 19;11(1):8485. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87792-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-87792-w
PMID:33875706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8055990/
Abstract

Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is crucial in diagnosing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes and has increased with the development of multigene panel tests. However, results classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) present challenges to clinicians in attempting to choose an appropriate management plans. We reviewed a total of 676 breast cancer patients included in the Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer (KOHBRA) study with a VUS on BRCA mutation tests between November 2007 and April 2013. These results were compared to the ClinVar database. We calculated the incidence and odds ratios for these variants using the Korean Reference Genome Database. A total of 58 and 91 distinct VUS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were identified in the KOHBRA study (comprising 278 and 453 patients, respectively). A total of 27 variants in the KOHBRA study were not registered in the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database. Among BRCA1 VUSs, 20 were reclassified as benign or likely benign, four were reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and eight remained as VUSs according to the ClinVar database. Of the BRCA2 VUSs, 25 were reclassified as benign or likely benign, two were reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and 33 remained as VUS according to the ClinVar database. There were 12 variants with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity for BRCA1 and 18 for BRCA2. Among them, p.Leu1780Pro showed a particularly high odds ratio. Six pathogenic variants and one conflicting variant identified using ClinVar could be reclassified as pathogenic variants in this study. Using updated ClinVar information and calculating odds ratios can be helpful when reclassifying VUSs in BRCA1/2.

摘要

BRCA1 和 BRCA2 的基因检测对于诊断遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征至关重要,并且随着多基因面板检测的发展而增加。然而,分类为意义不明的变异(VUS)的结果给试图选择适当管理计划的临床医生带来了挑战。我们回顾了 2007 年 11 月至 2013 年 4 月间在韩国遗传性乳腺癌(KOHBRA)研究中进行 BRCA 突变检测的 676 名乳腺癌患者的 VUS 结果,并与 ClinVar 数据库进行了比较。我们使用韩国参考基因组数据库计算了这些变体的发生率和优势比。在 KOHBRA 研究中,BRCA1 和 BRCA2 分别鉴定出 58 个和 91 个不同的 VUS(分别包含 278 名和 453 名患者)。KOHBRA 研究中有 27 个变体未在单核苷酸多态性数据库中注册。在 BRCA1 的 VUS 中,根据 ClinVar 数据库,有 20 个被重新分类为良性或可能良性,4 个被重新分类为致病性或可能致病性,8 个仍然为 VUS。在 BRCA2 的 VUS 中,根据 ClinVar 数据库,有 25 个被重新分类为良性或可能良性,2 个被重新分类为致病性或可能致病性,33 个仍然为 VUS。BRCA1 中有 12 个变体的致病性解释存在冲突,BRCA2 中有 18 个变体的致病性解释存在冲突。其中,p.Leu1780Pro 显示出特别高的优势比。本研究中,使用 ClinVar 确定的 6 个致病性变体和 1 个冲突变体可重新分类为致病性变体。使用更新的 ClinVar 信息并计算优势比有助于重新分类 BRCA1/2 中的 VUS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a7/8055990/de1b4aaa0aa2/41598_2021_87792_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a7/8055990/e1ba252a36c7/41598_2021_87792_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a7/8055990/de1b4aaa0aa2/41598_2021_87792_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a7/8055990/e1ba252a36c7/41598_2021_87792_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5a7/8055990/de1b4aaa0aa2/41598_2021_87792_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of BRCA1/2 variants of unknown significance in the prospective Korean Hereditary Breast Cancer study.在韩国遗传性乳腺癌前瞻性研究中分析意义未明的 BRCA1/2 变异体。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 19;11(1):8485. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87792-w.
2
Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.采用 ACMG/AMP 2015 指南重新解读遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者中意义未明的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;26(4):510-519. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00951-w. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
3
A Study on the Retrospective Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants.BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异的回顾性再阐释研究。
Clin Lab. 2024 Apr 1;70(4). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.230911.
4
Impact of proactive high-throughput functional assay data on BRCA1 variant interpretation in 3684 patients with breast or ovarian cancer.主动高通量功能测定数据对 3684 例乳腺癌或卵巢癌患者 BRCA1 变异解读的影响。
J Hum Genet. 2020 Mar;65(3):209-220. doi: 10.1038/s10038-019-0713-2. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
Reclassification of and variants of uncertain significance: a multifactorial analysis of multicentre prospective cohort.多中心前瞻性队列的多因素分析:和意义不明变异体的重新分类。
J Med Genet. 2018 Dec;55(12):794-802. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105565. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
6
Novel candidates of pathogenic variants of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes from a dataset of 3,552 Japanese whole genomes (3.5KJPNv2).从 3552 个日本人全基因组数据集(3.5KJPNv2)中发现 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 基因的致病性变异新型候选基因。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):e0236907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236907. eCollection 2021.
7
Variants of cancer susceptibility genes in Korean BRCA1/2 mutation-negative patients with high risk for hereditary breast cancer.韩国 BRCA1/2 突变阴性遗传性乳腺癌高危患者中癌症易感性基因的变异。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 16;18(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3940-y.
8
Reclassification of and variants found in ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers.卵巢上皮性、输卵管和原发性腹膜癌中发现的 和 变异体的重新分类。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Nov;31(6):e83. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e83.
9
Multigene Panel Testing Detects Equal Rates of Pathogenic BRCA1/2 Mutations and has a Higher Diagnostic Yield Compared to Limited BRCA1/2 Analysis Alone in Patients at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer.多基因检测面板检测出的致病性BRCA1/2突变率相同,与仅对有遗传性乳腺癌风险的患者进行有限的BRCA1/2分析相比,具有更高的诊断率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(10):3282-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4754-2. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10
Retesting of women who are negative for a and mutation using a 20-gene panel.对 和 突变阴性的女性使用 20 基因检测panel 进行重复检测。
J Med Genet. 2020 Jun;57(6):380-384. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106403. Epub 2019 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Atypical cancer risk profile in carriers of Italian founder BRCA1 variant p.His1673del: Implications for classification and clinical management.意大利种系 BRCA1 突变 p.His1673del 携带者的非典型癌症风险特征:对分类和临床管理的影响。
Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(16):e70114. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70114.
2
Landscape of germline variants in breast and ovarian cancer in Peru.秘鲁乳腺癌和卵巢癌种系变异情况
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 17;13:1227864. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1227864. eCollection 2023.
3
Clinical risk management of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostatic cancers for BRCA1/2 variant carriers in Japan.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinicopathological Features of Patients with the BRCA1 c.5339T>C (p.Leu1780Pro) Variant.BRCA1 c.5339T>C(p.Leu1780Pro)变异患者的临床病理特征。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):680-688. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.351. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Reinterpretation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with hereditary breast/ovarian cancer using the ACMG/AMP 2015 guidelines.采用 ACMG/AMP 2015 指南重新解读遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌患者中意义未明的 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 变异。
Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;26(4):510-519. doi: 10.1007/s12282-019-00951-w. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
3
Mutations and Breast Cancer Prevention.
日本 BRCA1/2 变异携带者的乳腺癌、卵巢癌、胰腺癌和前列腺癌的临床风险管理。
J Hum Genet. 2023 Aug;68(8):517-526. doi: 10.1038/s10038-023-01153-1. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
4
Assessing the pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance: Relevance and challenges for breast cancer precision medicine.评估意义未明变异的致病性:对乳腺癌精准医学的相关性与挑战
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 18;12:1053035. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1053035. eCollection 2022.
5
Comprehensive clinical characterization of patients with : c.5017_5019del germline variant.携带c.5017_5019del种系变体患者的综合临床特征
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022 Dec;103(6):323-330. doi: 10.4174/astr.2022.103.6.323. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
突变与乳腺癌预防
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Dec 19;10(12):524. doi: 10.3390/cancers10120524.
4
Reclassification of and variants of uncertain significance: a multifactorial analysis of multicentre prospective cohort.多中心前瞻性队列的多因素分析:和意义不明变异体的重新分类。
J Med Genet. 2018 Dec;55(12):794-802. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105565. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
5
Additional molecular and clinical evidence open the way to definitive IARC classification of the BRCA1 c.5332G > A (p.Asp1778Asn) variant.更多的分子和临床证据为国际癌症研究机构(IARC)对BRCA1基因c.5332G > A(p.Asp1778Asn)变异进行最终分类开辟了道路。
Clin Biochem. 2019 Jan;63:54-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
6
Dealing With BRCA1/2 Unclassified Variants in a Cancer Genetics Clinic: Does Cosegregation Analysis Help?癌症遗传学诊所中BRCA1/2未分类变异的处理:共分离分析有帮助吗?
Front Genet. 2018 Sep 11;9:378. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00378. eCollection 2018.
7
Accurate classification of BRCA1 variants with saturation genome editing.饱和基因组编辑精准分类 BRCA1 变异。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7726):217-222. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0461-z. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
Breast Cancer Genetics and Indications for Prophylactic Mastectomy.乳腺癌遗传学与预防性乳房切除术的适应证。
Surg Clin North Am. 2018 Aug;98(4):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
Observed frequency and challenges of variant reclassification in a hereditary cancer clinic.遗传性癌症诊所中变异重新分类的观察频率和挑战。
Genet Med. 2018 Mar;20(3):346-350. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.207. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
10
Practice Bulletin No 182: Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.实践公告第 182 号:遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;130(3):e110-e126. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002296.