• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Narrative Review of Diabetes Group Visits in Low-Income and Underserved Settings.低收入和服务不足环境下糖尿病小组就诊的叙述性综述
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2019;15(5):372-381. doi: 10.2174/1573399814666181112145910.
2
Imbedding Interdisciplinary Diabetes Group Visits Into a Community-Based Medical Setting.将跨学科糖尿病小组问诊纳入社区医疗环境。
Diabetes Educ. 2016 Feb;42(1):96-107. doi: 10.1177/0145721715620022. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
3
Glycemic control and preventive care measures of indigent diabetes patients within a pharmacist-managed insulin titration program vs standard care.药师管理下的胰岛素滴定方案与标准护理对贫困糖尿病患者的血糖控制和预防保健措施的比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Jan;46(1):29-34. doi: 10.1345/aph.1Q512. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
4
Shared medical appointments based on the chronic care model: a quality improvement project to address the challenges of patients with diabetes with high cardiovascular risk.基于慢性病护理模式的共享医疗预约:一项应对心血管高风险糖尿病患者挑战的质量改进项目。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Oct;16(5):349-53. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019158.
5
Impact of a clinical pharmacy program on changes in hemoglobin A1c, diabetes-related hospitalizations, and diabetes-related emergency department visits for patients with diabetes in an underserved population.在服务不足人群中,临床药学项目对糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白变化、糖尿病相关住院和糖尿病相关急诊就诊的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Sep;20(9):914-9. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.9.914.
6
A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus: 5 year results of the IDEATel study.一项针对老年、种族多样、医疗服务不足的糖尿病患者,比较远程医疗病例管理与常规护理的随机试验:IDEATel研究的5年结果
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):446-56. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3157. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
7
Improving diabetes care for minority, uninsured and underserved patients.改善少数族裔、未参保及医疗服务不足患者的糖尿病护理。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2014 Aug;16(4):747-50. doi: 10.1007/s10903-013-9965-7.
8
A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus.一项针对年龄较大、种族多样、医疗服务不足的糖尿病患者,比较远程医疗病例管理与常规护理的随机试验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):40-51. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1917. Epub 2005 Oct 12.
9
Are home visits an effective method for diabetes management? A quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis.家庭访视是否是糖尿病管理的有效方法?一项定量系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Investig. 2017 Sep;8(5):701-708. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12630. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
10
Non-medical prescribing versus medical prescribing for acute and chronic disease management in primary and secondary care.基层医疗和二级医疗中急性和慢性疾病管理的非医学处方与医学处方对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 22;11(11):CD011227. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011227.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Training clinicians to facilitate diabetes group visits.培训临床医生以推动糖尿病小组诊疗。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06876-7.
2
Implementing Food as Medicine During COVID-19: Produce Prescriptions and Integrative Group Medical Visits in Federally Qualified Health Centers.在新冠疫情期间实施“食物即药物”理念:在联邦合格健康中心推行农产品处方和综合集体医疗问诊
Glob Adv Integr Med Health. 2025 Jan 27;14:27536130251316535. doi: 10.1177/27536130251316535. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
A Mixed-Methods Comparison of Interventions to Increase Advance Care Planning.混合方法比较干预措施以增加预先护理计划。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;37(2):215-227. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230187R2.
4
Transforming care for patients living with diabetes in rural Mexico: a qualitative study of patient and provider experiences and perceptions of shared medical appointments.改变墨西哥农村地区糖尿病患者的护理方式:一项关于患者和提供者对共同医疗预约的体验和看法的定性研究。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2215004. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2215004.
5
A nutrition and lifestyle-focused shared medical appointment in a resource-challenged community setting: a mixed-methods study.在资源有限的社区环境中开展以营养和生活方式为重点的共享医疗预约:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 7;22(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12833-6.
6
A culturally adapted, social support-based, diabetes group visit model for Bangladeshi adults in the USA: a feasibility study.针对美国孟加拉裔成年人的一种文化适应性强、基于社会支持的糖尿病小组就诊模式:一项可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Jan 24;8(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-00974-9.
7
Mentored implementation to initiate a diabetes program in an underserved community: a pilot study.导师指导实施计划在服务不足社区启动糖尿病项目:一项试点研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Aug;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002320.
8
"Living Well with Chronic Pain": Integrative Pain Management via Shared Medical Appointments.“与慢性疼痛和谐共处”:通过联合门诊进行综合疼痛管理。
Pain Med. 2021 Feb 4;22(1):181-190. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa418.
9
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments (SMAs) as Implemented in Five Veterans Affairs Health Systems: a Multi-site Cluster Randomized Pragmatic Trial.评价在五个退伍军人事务医疗系统中实施的糖尿病共享医疗预约(SMAs)的效果:一项多地点集群随机实用试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):1648-1655. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06570-y. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
Utilizing Telemedicine for Group Visit Provider Encounters: A Feasibility and Acceptability Study.利用远程医疗进行小组就诊提供者会诊:一项可行性和可接受性研究。
Int J Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Summer;1(1):1-6. Epub 2020 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustainability of Clinical Benefits Gained During a Multidisciplinary Diabetes Shared Medical Appointment After Patients Return to Usual Care.患者恢复常规护理后,多学科糖尿病联合门诊所获临床益处的可持续性。
Clin Diabetes. 2018 Jul;36(3):226-231. doi: 10.2337/cd17-0132.
2
Standardizing Clinically Meaningful Outcome Measures Beyond HbA for Type 1 Diabetes: A Consensus Report of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, the American Diabetes Association, the Endocrine Society, JDRF International, The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the T1D Exchange.1型糖尿病HbA之外临床有意义结局指标的标准化:美国临床内分泌医师协会、美国糖尿病教育者协会、美国糖尿病协会、内分泌学会、国际青少年糖尿病研究基金会、利昂娜·M.和哈里·B.赫尔姆斯利慈善信托基金、儿科内分泌学会以及T1D交流组织的共识报告
Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1622-1630. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1624.
3
Integrating CHWs as Part of the Team Leading Diabetes Group Visits: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study.将 CHW 整合到糖尿病小组访视团队中:一项随机对照可行性研究。
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Dec;43(6):589-599. doi: 10.1177/0145721717737742. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
4
Comment on American Diabetes Association. . Diabetes Care 2017;40(Suppl. 1):S1-S135.对美国糖尿病协会的评论。《糖尿病护理》2017年;40(增刊1):S1 - S135。
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):e92-e93. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0299.
5
Educational Strategies of Diabetes Group Medical Visits: A Review.糖尿病小组医疗就诊的教育策略:综述
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2018;14(3):227-236. doi: 10.2174/1573399813666170203111851.
6
The effectiveness of group medical visits on diabetes mellitus type 2 (dm2) specific outcomes in adults: a systematic review.成人2型糖尿病(DM2)特定结局的团体医疗就诊效果:一项系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(23):833-885. doi: 10.11124/01938924-201109230-00001.
7
Group visits to encourage insulin initiation: targeting patient barriers.小组就诊以鼓励开始使用胰岛素:针对患者的障碍
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Jun;26(11-12):1705-1713. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13577. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
8
Achieving Health Equity: Closing The Gaps In Health Care Disparities, Interventions, And Research.实现健康公平:消除医疗保健差异、干预措施及研究方面的差距
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Aug 1;35(8):1410-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0158.
9
Incorporating Group Medical Visits into Primary Healthcare: Are There Benefits?将团体医疗就诊纳入初级医疗保健:是否有益?
Healthc Policy. 2015 Nov;11(2):27-42.
10
Imbedding Interdisciplinary Diabetes Group Visits Into a Community-Based Medical Setting.将跨学科糖尿病小组问诊纳入社区医疗环境。
Diabetes Educ. 2016 Feb;42(1):96-107. doi: 10.1177/0145721715620022. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

低收入和服务不足环境下糖尿病小组就诊的叙述性综述

A Narrative Review of Diabetes Group Visits in Low-Income and Underserved Settings.

作者信息

Vaughan Elizabeth M, Johnston Craig A, Arlinghaus Katherine R, Hyman David J, Foreyt John P

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1504 Taub Loop, 2 RM-81-001 a-f. BCM 285, Houston, TX, United States.

Department of Health, University of Houston, 3855 Holman Street, Houston, TX, United States.

出版信息

Curr Diabetes Rev. 2019;15(5):372-381. doi: 10.2174/1573399814666181112145910.

DOI:10.2174/1573399814666181112145910
PMID:30421682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6511502/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have supported the efficacy of diabetes group visits. However, the benefit of diabetes group visits for low-income and underserved individuals is not clear. The purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative review in order to clarify the efficacy of diabetes group visits in low-income and underserved settings.

METHODS

The authors performed a narrative review, categorizing studies into nonrandomized and randomized.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were identified. Hemoglobin A1c was the most commonly measured outcome, which improved for the majority of group visit participants. Preventive care showed consistent improvement for intervention arms. There were several other study outcomes including metabolic (i.e., blood pressure), behavioral (i.e., exercise), functional (i.e., quality of life), and system-based (i.e., cost).

CONCLUSION

Diabetes group visits for low-income and underserved individuals resulted in superior preventive care but the impact on glycemic control remains unclear.

摘要

背景

先前的研究支持糖尿病小组就诊的疗效。然而,糖尿病小组就诊对低收入和服务不足人群的益处尚不清楚。本研究的目的是进行一项叙述性综述,以阐明糖尿病小组就诊在低收入和服务不足环境中的疗效。

方法

作者进行了一项叙述性综述,将研究分为非随机和随机研究。

结果

共确定了14项研究。糖化血红蛋白是最常测量的结果,大多数小组就诊参与者的糖化血红蛋白有所改善。干预组的预防保健显示出持续改善。还有其他一些研究结果,包括代谢(即血压)、行为(即运动)、功能(即生活质量)和基于系统的(即成本)。

结论

针对低收入和服务不足人群的糖尿病小组就诊带来了更好的预防保健,但对血糖控制的影响仍不清楚。