Mogambery T A, Moodley A, Connolly C
Department of Medicine, Edendale Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, and Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
S Afr Med J. 2018 Oct 2;108(10):865-869. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i10.13176.
Measurement of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure (OP) during lumbar puncture (LP) should be routine practice. In resource-limited centres, spinal manometers are seldom available and alternative procedures to measure CSF OP are undertaken.
To investigate whether the intravenous giving set (IVGS) with a measuring tape is a reliable alternative to the spinal manometer.
One hundred patients requiring CSF examination by LP were consecutively recruited in the Department of Medicine at Edendale Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. A three-way stopcock was attached to the end of a 22G spinal needle and the IVGS and spinal manometer were attached to the other two openings of the stopcock. CSF OP was consecutively recorded between the two techniques with 50 patients in each group.
The mean (standard deviation (SD)) CSF OP of the 100 patients was 22.7 (10.0) cm CSF measured with the manometer v. 16.2 (9.3) cm CSF measured with the IVGS (p<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed similarly significant findings of consistently lower CSF OP with the IVGS, regardless of whether the IVGS reading was done first or second. The manometer detected 34 cases of elevated CSF OP of >25 cm CSF, but the IVGS detected 11 cases only (p<0.001, McNemar's χ2 test). Similar differences were noted for the subgroups of manometer first and IVGS first. Despite this, linear correlation showed very good correlation (r=0.78) and a 75% agreement between the two techniques. The relationship between the manometer reading and the IVGS reading was M = 0.85V + 8.9 in cm CSF, where M was the manometer reading and V the IVGS reading.
The IVGS consistently underestimated the CSF OP against the tried-and-tested spinal manometer, which should be the preferred method of measuring CSF OP. Based on the equation that describes the relationship between the spinal manometer and IVGS reading, the upper limit of normal CSF OP of 25 cm CSF on the manometer is equivalent to 19 cm CSF on the IVGS.
腰椎穿刺(LP)时测量脑脊液(CSF)初压(OP)应作为常规操作。在资源有限的中心,很少有脊髓测压计,因此会采用其他方法来测量CSF OP。
研究带有卷尺的静脉输液器(IVGS)是否是脊髓测压计的可靠替代方法。
在南非彼得马里茨堡埃登代尔医院内科连续招募了100例需要通过LP进行CSF检查的患者。在22G脊髓穿刺针的末端连接一个三通旋塞,IVGS和脊髓测压计分别连接到旋塞的另外两个开口。两组各50例患者,用这两种技术连续记录CSF OP。
100例患者的平均(标准差(SD))CSF OP,用测压计测量为22.7(10.0)cm CSF,而用IVGS测量为16.2(9.3)cm CSF(p<0.001)。亚组分析显示,无论IVGS读数是先进行还是后进行,使用IVGS时CSF OP始终较低,结果同样具有显著意义。测压计检测到34例CSF OP升高>25 cm CSF的病例,但IVGS仅检测到11例(p<0.001,McNemar卡方检验)。测压计先测和IVGS先测的亚组也有类似差异。尽管如此,线性相关性显示两种技术具有很好的相关性(r = 0.78),一致性为75%。测压计读数与IVGS读数之间的关系为M = 0.85V + 8.9(cm CSF),其中M为测压计读数,V为IVGS读数。
与经过验证的脊髓测压计相比,IVGS始终低估CSF OP,脊髓测压计应是测量CSF OP的首选方法。根据描述脊髓测压计与IVGS读数之间关系的方程,测压计上CSF OP正常上限25 cm CSF相当于IVGS上的19 cm CSF。