Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra , Coimbra , Portugal.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra , Coimbra , Portugal.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Oct;33(7):1159-1174. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1532022. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), scored according to the Babins, Rouleau, and Cahn scoring systems, for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) screening, and develop corresponding cutoff scores. Additionally, we assessed the construct validity of the CDT through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. We developed a cross-sectional study of ambulatory MCI and AD patients, divided in two clinical groups (450 MCI and 250 mild AD patients) and a normal control group ( = 400). All participants were assessed with the CDT, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for convergent validity. The selected scoring systems presented adequate validity and reliability values. The proposed cutoff scores showed 60 to 65% sensitivity and 58 to 62% specificity to identify MCI patients. The corresponding values for AD were 84 to 90% sensitivity and 76 to 78% specificity. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the Babins scoring system had good construct validity and allowed us to propose a three-factor model for this system. Our results confirmed the complexity of the CDT and support it as a cognitive screening instrument particularly sensitive to AD. The use of the CDT with MCI patients should be interpreted with more caution due to the lower sensitivity and specificity for milder forms of cognitive impairment.
本研究旨在分析根据 Babins、Rouleau 和 Cahn 评分系统对轻度认知障碍 (MCI) 和阿尔茨海默病 (AD) 进行筛查的画钟测验 (CDT) 的心理计量学和诊断特性,并制定相应的截断分数。此外,我们还通过探索性和验证性因子分析评估了 CDT 的结构效度。我们开展了一项针对门诊 MCI 和 AD 患者的横断面研究,将患者分为两组(450 例 MCI 和 250 例轻度 AD 患者)和一组正常对照组(=400 例)。所有参与者均接受了 CDT、简易精神状态检查 (MMSE) 和蒙特利尔认知评估 (MoCA) 评估,以评估其聚合效度。所选评分系统具有较好的有效性和可靠性。建议的截断分数对识别 MCI 患者的敏感性为 60%至 65%,特异性为 58%至 62%。AD 的相应值为 84%至 90%的敏感性和 76%至 78%的特异性。探索性和验证性因子分析表明,Babins 评分系统具有良好的结构效度,并允许我们为该系统提出一个三因素模型。我们的结果证实了 CDT 的复杂性,并支持其作为一种对 AD 特别敏感的认知筛查工具。由于对较轻形式的认知障碍的敏感性和特异性较低,因此对 MCI 患者使用 CDT 时应更加谨慎。