Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society.
Community Strategies Division, Health Management Associates.
Health Commun. 2020 Jan;35(1):89-95. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1544875. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
Smoking behavior may be influenced by perceived trust of information from tobacco and e-cigarette companies about their products. The purpose of this study was to identify sociodemographic subgroups with more trust in tobacco product (tobacco and e-cigarette) companies than health professionals and explore associations between this relative trust and tobacco product use.Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 4, FDA Cycle) data were analyzed ( = 3,738). Two relative trust measures were developed identifying respondents who trust tobacco companies or e-cigarette companies as much as or more than health professionals for information about the health effects of tobacco products or e-cigarettes versus those who place more trust in health professionals. Dependent variables were smoking status (current, former, never) and e-cigarette use (ever, never). Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted in SAS 9.4 using jackknife replicate weights.Respondents who trusted tobacco or e-cigarette companies as much as or more than health professionals were disproportionately from racial/ethnic minority groups or had low levels of income or education (all < 0.05). Relative trust was not associated with smoking status. After controlling for demographics, respondents who trusted e-cigarette companies as much as or more than health professionals had 87% greater odds (95% CI: 1.16, 3.00) of e-cigarette use, compared to respondents who placed higher trust in health professionals.Findings suggest that population subgroups with greater trust in e-cigarette companies relative to health professionals are more prone to e-cigarette use. Targeted communication strategies may be needed for underserved populations and to counter messaging from e-cigarette companies.
吸烟行为可能受到对烟草和电子烟公司有关其产品信息的信任程度的影响。本研究的目的是确定对烟草产品(烟草和电子烟)公司的信任程度高于健康专业人员的社会人口统计学亚组,并探讨这种相对信任与烟草产品使用之间的关联。对健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS 4,FDA 周期)数据进行了分析(n=3738)。开发了两种相对信任措施,确定了那些认为烟草公司或电子烟公司与健康专业人员一样或更信任有关烟草产品或电子烟对健康影响的信息的受访者,而不是那些更信任健康专业人员的受访者。因变量为吸烟状况(当前、曾经、从不)和电子烟使用(曾经、从不)。在 SAS 9.4 中使用 jackknife 重复权重进行了双变量分析和多变量逻辑回归。与健康专业人员相比,信任烟草或电子烟公司与健康专业人员一样或更信任的受访者不成比例地来自种族/少数民族群体,或收入或教育水平较低(均<0.05)。相对信任与吸烟状况无关。在控制了人口统计学因素后,与更信任健康专业人员的受访者相比,信任电子烟公司与健康专业人员一样或更信任的受访者使用电子烟的几率增加了 87%(95%CI:1.16,3.00)。
调查结果表明,与健康专业人员相比,对电子烟公司的信任程度更高的人群更倾向于使用电子烟。可能需要针对服务不足的人群和电子烟公司的信息传递制定有针对性的沟通策略。