• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从健康专业人士与烟草或电子烟公司获取关于烟草和电子烟的信息的信任:按亚组划分的差异及其对烟草宣传的影响。

Trust of Information about Tobacco and E-Cigarettes from Health Professionals versus Tobacco or Electronic Cigarette Companies: Differences by Subgroups and Implications for Tobacco Messaging.

机构信息

Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society.

Community Strategies Division, Health Management Associates.

出版信息

Health Commun. 2020 Jan;35(1):89-95. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1544875. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1080/10410236.2018.1544875
PMID:30422690
Abstract

Smoking behavior may be influenced by perceived trust of information from tobacco and e-cigarette companies about their products. The purpose of this study was to identify sociodemographic subgroups with more trust in tobacco product (tobacco and e-cigarette) companies than health professionals and explore associations between this relative trust and tobacco product use.Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 4, FDA Cycle) data were analyzed ( = 3,738). Two relative trust measures were developed identifying respondents who trust tobacco companies or e-cigarette companies as much as or more than health professionals for information about the health effects of tobacco products or e-cigarettes versus those who place more trust in health professionals. Dependent variables were smoking status (current, former, never) and e-cigarette use (ever, never). Bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted in SAS 9.4 using jackknife replicate weights.Respondents who trusted tobacco or e-cigarette companies as much as or more than health professionals were disproportionately from racial/ethnic minority groups or had low levels of income or education (all < 0.05). Relative trust was not associated with smoking status. After controlling for demographics, respondents who trusted e-cigarette companies as much as or more than health professionals had 87% greater odds (95% CI: 1.16, 3.00) of e-cigarette use, compared to respondents who placed higher trust in health professionals.Findings suggest that population subgroups with greater trust in e-cigarette companies relative to health professionals are more prone to e-cigarette use. Targeted communication strategies may be needed for underserved populations and to counter messaging from e-cigarette companies.

摘要

吸烟行为可能受到对烟草和电子烟公司有关其产品信息的信任程度的影响。本研究的目的是确定对烟草产品(烟草和电子烟)公司的信任程度高于健康专业人员的社会人口统计学亚组,并探讨这种相对信任与烟草产品使用之间的关联。对健康信息国家趋势调查(HINTS 4,FDA 周期)数据进行了分析(n=3738)。开发了两种相对信任措施,确定了那些认为烟草公司或电子烟公司与健康专业人员一样或更信任有关烟草产品或电子烟对健康影响的信息的受访者,而不是那些更信任健康专业人员的受访者。因变量为吸烟状况(当前、曾经、从不)和电子烟使用(曾经、从不)。在 SAS 9.4 中使用 jackknife 重复权重进行了双变量分析和多变量逻辑回归。与健康专业人员相比,信任烟草或电子烟公司与健康专业人员一样或更信任的受访者不成比例地来自种族/少数民族群体,或收入或教育水平较低(均<0.05)。相对信任与吸烟状况无关。在控制了人口统计学因素后,与更信任健康专业人员的受访者相比,信任电子烟公司与健康专业人员一样或更信任的受访者使用电子烟的几率增加了 87%(95%CI:1.16,3.00)。

调查结果表明,与健康专业人员相比,对电子烟公司的信任程度更高的人群更倾向于使用电子烟。可能需要针对服务不足的人群和电子烟公司的信息传递制定有针对性的沟通策略。

相似文献

1
Trust of Information about Tobacco and E-Cigarettes from Health Professionals versus Tobacco or Electronic Cigarette Companies: Differences by Subgroups and Implications for Tobacco Messaging.从健康专业人士与烟草或电子烟公司获取关于烟草和电子烟的信息的信任:按亚组划分的差异及其对烟草宣传的影响。
Health Commun. 2020 Jan;35(1):89-95. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1544875. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
2
It Is About Trust: Trust in Sources of Tobacco Health Information, Perceptions of Harm, and Use of E-Cigarettes.这关乎信任:对烟草健康信息来源的信任、对危害的认知以及对电子烟的使用。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(5):822-826. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz004.
3
Source Credibility and E-Cigarette Attitudes: Implications for Tobacco Communication.来源可信度与电子烟态度:对烟草传播的启示。
Health Commun. 2018 Sep;33(9):1059-1067. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1331190. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
4
Rural-urban differences e-cigarette ever use, the perception of harm, and e-cigarette information seeking behaviors among U.S. adults in a nationally representative study.在一项具有全国代表性的研究中,美国成年人的城乡差异电子烟使用情况、对危害的认知以及电子烟信息搜索行为。
Prev Med. 2020 Jan;130:105898. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105898. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
5
Socioeconomic and Demographic Status and Perceived Health Risks of E-Cigarette Product Contents Among Youth: Results From a National Survey.青少年的社会经济和人口统计学状况以及对电子烟产品成分的感知健康风险:一项全国性调查的结果
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jan;21(1_suppl):148S-156S. doi: 10.1177/1524839919882700.
6
Misplaced Trust: Racial Differences in Use of Tobacco Products and Trust in Sources of Tobacco Health Information.错置的信任:烟草制品使用中的种族差异以及对烟草健康信息来源的信任
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Oct 1;19(10):1199-1208. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx080.
7
Association of Electronic Cigarette Use With Subsequent Initiation of Tobacco Cigarettes in US Youths.电子烟使用与美国青少年随后开始使用传统香烟之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e187794. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7794.
8
Electronic cigarettes and narghile users in Brazil: Do they differ from cigarettes smokers?巴西的电子烟和水烟使用者:他们与香烟吸烟者有何不同?
Addict Behav. 2019 Nov;98:106007. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.05.031. Epub 2019 May 29.
9
E-cigarette use among adults in China: findings from repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2015-16 and 2018-19.中国成年人电子烟使用情况:2015-2016 年和 2018-2019 年重复横断面调查的结果。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Dec;5(12):e639-e649. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30145-6.
10
Tobacco Risk Information and Comparative Risk Assessment of E-Cigarettes Vs. Cigarettes: Application of the Reinforcing Spirals Model.电子烟与香烟的烟草风险信息和比较风险评估:强化螺旋模型的应用。
J Health Commun. 2019;24(4):422-431. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1630526. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Message Source Credibility and E-Cigarette Harm Perceptions among Young Adults.信息源可信度与年轻人对电子烟危害的认知
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9123. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159123.
2
Associations between perceived source credibility, e-cigarettes, and e-cigarette ad perceptions.感知到的来源可信度、电子烟与电子烟广告认知之间的关联。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jun 13;28:101862. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101862. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Association Between Social Media Use and Cancer Screening Awareness and Behavior for People Without a Cancer Diagnosis: Matched Cohort Study.
社交媒体使用与无癌症诊断人群癌症筛查意识和行为的关联:匹配队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 27;23(8):e26395. doi: 10.2196/26395.
4
The Potential of Smartphone Apps in Informing Protobacco and Antitobacco Messaging Efforts Among Underserved Communities: Longitudinal Observational Study.智能手机应用在向服务不足社区传播反烟草信息中的潜力:纵向观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 7;22(7):e17451. doi: 10.2196/17451.