• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Lumbar Vertebrae Morphological Analysis and an Additional Approach for Vertebrae Identification in Lumbar Spine DXA Images.腰椎形态分析及腰椎骨密度 X 线图像中椎体识别的附加方法。
J Clin Densitom. 2020 Jul-Sep;23(3):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
2
Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine?定量计算机断层扫描测量的区域骨密度差异:临床常用的 L1-L2 平均值与整个腰骶部脊柱相关吗?
Spine J. 2019 Apr;19(4):695-702. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Bone Mineral Density T-Scores Derived from CT Attenuation Numbers (Hounsfield Units): Clinical Utility and Correlation with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry.由CT衰减值(亨氏单位)得出的骨密度T值:临床应用及与双能X线吸收法的相关性
Iowa Orthop J. 2018;38:25-31.
4
Dual-energy CT-based phantomless in vivo three-dimensional bone mineral density assessment of the lumbar spine.基于双能 CT 的腰椎脊柱无模型体素内三维骨密度评估。
Radiology. 2014 Jun;271(3):778-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131952. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
5
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Does Not Represent Bone Structure in Patients with Osteoporosis: A Comparison of Lumbar Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry with Vertebral Biopsies.双能 X 射线吸收法不能反映骨质疏松症患者的骨结构:腰椎双能 X 射线吸收法与椎骨活检的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Jul 1;46(13):861-866. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003917.
6
Use of routine thoracic and abdominal computed tomography scans for assessing bone mineral density and detecting osteoporosis.使用常规胸部和腹部计算机断层扫描来评估骨矿物质密度并检测骨质疏松症。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(10):1871-81. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1074892. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
7
Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.荷兰西北部双能X线吸收法诊断性能的差异。
Osteoporos Int. 2004 Apr;15(4):335-44. doi: 10.1007/s00198-003-1541-x. Epub 2003 Nov 20.
8
Thoracic Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Can Sensitively Monitor Bone Mineral Metabolism: Comparison of Thoracic QCT vs Lumbar QCT and Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Detection of Age-relative Change in Bone Mineral Density.胸部定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)可灵敏监测骨矿物质代谢:胸部QCT与腰椎QCT及双能X线吸收法在检测骨密度年龄相关变化中的比较
Acad Radiol. 2017 Dec;24(12):1582-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
9
Assessment of bone quality at the lumbar and sacral spine using CT scans: a retrospective feasibility study in 50 comparing CT and DXA data.使用 CT 扫描评估腰椎和骶骨的骨质量:50 例 CT 和 DXA 数据比较的回顾性可行性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2020 May;29(5):1098-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06292-z. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
10
Opportunistic use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to evaluate lumbar scoliosis.利用双能 X 射线吸收法评估腰椎侧凸的机会性使用。
Arch Osteoporos. 2021 Feb 23;16(1):38. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00898-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Osteoporosis associated vertebral fractures-Health economic implications.骨质疏松症相关椎体骨折的健康经济影响
PLoS One. 2017 May 22;12(5):e0178209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178209. eCollection 2017.
2
Quality in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans.双能 X 射线吸收法扫描中的质量。
Bone. 2017 Nov;104:13-28. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.033. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
Best Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and Reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance.双能X线吸收测定法测量与报告的最佳实践:国际临床骨密度学会指南
J Clin Densitom. 2016 Apr-Jun;19(2):127-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
4
Variability in DXA Reporting and Other Challenges in Osteoporosis Evaluation.双能X线吸收法报告的变异性及骨质疏松症评估中的其他挑战。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):393-5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7550.
5
Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis.骨质疏松症防治临床指南
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Oct;25(10):2359-81. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
6
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density.双能X线吸收法:骨密度测量与解读中的陷阱
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Mar;17(2):203-10. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.109659.
7
European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.欧洲绝经后妇女骨质疏松症的诊断和管理指南。
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jan;24(1):23-57. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2074-y. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
8
Osteoporosis: a still increasing prevalence.骨质疏松症:患病率仍在上升。
Bone. 2006 Feb;38(2 Suppl 1):S4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.11.024.
9
Consensus of an international panel on the clinical utility of bone mass measurements in the detection of low bone mass in the adult population.
Calcif Tissue Int. 1996 Apr;58(4):207-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02508636.
10
Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.骨密度测量对骨质疏松性骨折发生情况预测效果的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 1996 May 18;312(7041):1254-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7041.1254.

腰椎形态分析及腰椎骨密度 X 线图像中椎体识别的附加方法。

Lumbar Vertebrae Morphological Analysis and an Additional Approach for Vertebrae Identification in Lumbar Spine DXA Images.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medicine Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medicine Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2020 Jul-Sep;23(3):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2018.09.004
PMID:30425005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6520202/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for diagnosis of osteoporosis. However, DXA interpretation can be influenced by analytic errors which can, in turn, interfere with diagnostic accuracy. One such source of potential error is the accurate identification of specific lumbar vertebrae on lumbar spine DXA images. Although the International Society for Clinical Densitometry has introduced several approaches to aid with this process, there remain individuals whose lumbar vertebrae cannot be labeled with certainty using these approaches. We designed the present study to systematically evaluate lumbar spine DXA images among a large cohort of Chinese patients and present an additional simple strategy for identifying L5 named the "em dash"-shaped L5 or "-"-shaped L5, based upon the two-dimensional relationship between the bilateral pedicles with the central spinous process on DXA images.

METHODOLOGY

Lumbar spine posteroanterior DXA images from adult patients receiving care at a large tertiary hospital in Beijing, China from May to August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. For each patient, data were collected regarding key anatomic features seen on DXA (positions of the most superior portions of the iliac crests, the lowest vertebra with ribs, and the longest transverse processes) and the proportion of patients presenting with "H"-shaped L4 and "-"-shaped L5. Chi-squared analyses were used to compare proportions across age strata.

RESULTS

DXA images from 1125 patients (79.6% female) were evaluated. The mean age of patients was 52.5 ± 14.8 yr (range: 19-90 yr). A horizontal line drawn across the superior-most portions of the iliac crests crossed the disk space between L4 and L5 among 78.3% of patients. The lowest ribs were most frequently (83.9%) observed at T12. Almost 80% of individuals had the longest transverse processes at L3. L4 was predominantly "H"-shaped (73.3%), however we found that the proportion of individuals with "H"-shaped L4 decreased steadily after 50 yr of age (p < 0.001). By contrast we observed that L5 was predominantly "-"-shaped (80.3%), with no significant differences in proportions across all age strata (p = 0.063).

CONCLUSIONS

The "-"-shaped L5 can be incorporated as an additional reference tool for lumbar spine DXA image analysis and may be particularly helpful for lumbar vertebrae identification among patients over 50 yr of age.

摘要

简介

双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)测量的骨密度是诊断骨质疏松症的金标准。然而,DXA 解读可能受到分析误差的影响,这反过来又会影响诊断的准确性。潜在误差的一个来源是在腰椎 DXA 图像上准确识别特定的腰椎。尽管国际临床密度测定学会已经提出了几种方法来辅助这一过程,但仍有一些人的腰椎无法使用这些方法确定。我们设计了本研究,对中国一个大型患者队列的腰椎 DXA 图像进行了系统评估,并提出了一种简单的附加策略,根据双侧椎弓根与 DXA 图像上中央棘突的二维关系,将 L5 标记为“破折号”形 L5 或“-”形 L5。

方法

回顾性分析 2016 年 5 月至 8 月在中国北京一家大型三级医院接受治疗的成年患者的腰椎前后位 DXA 图像。对于每位患者,收集 DXA 上可见的关键解剖特征的数据(髂嵴最上部的位置、带肋骨的最低椎骨和最长的横突)以及呈现“H”形 L4 和“-”形 L5 的患者比例。卡方分析用于比较不同年龄组的比例。

结果

评估了 1125 名患者(79.6%为女性)的 DXA 图像。患者的平均年龄为 52.5±14.8 岁(范围:19-90 岁)。一条穿过髂嵴最上部的水平线穿过 L4 和 L5 之间的椎间盘间隙,在 78.3%的患者中穿过。最低肋骨最常(83.9%)观察到 T12。几乎 80%的人最长的横突在 L3。L4 主要是“H”形(73.3%),然而,我们发现,50 岁以后,具有“H”形 L4 的个体比例稳步下降(p<0.001)。相比之下,我们观察到 L5 主要是“-”形(80.3%),在所有年龄组中,比例没有显著差异(p=0.063)。

结论

“-”形 L5 可作为腰椎 DXA 图像分析的附加参考工具,对于 50 岁以上患者的腰椎识别特别有帮助。