• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院前及住院期间直接口服抗凝剂处方的适宜性及不适当处方的决定因素分析

Appropriateness of DOAC Prescribing Before and During Hospital Admission and Analysis of Determinants for Inappropriate Prescribing.

作者信息

Moudallel Souad, Steurbaut Stephane, Cornu Pieter, Dupont Alain

机构信息

Centre for Pharmaceutical Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2018 Oct 30;9:1220. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01220. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2018.01220
PMID:30425641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6218888/
Abstract

Appropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is required to avoid under- and overdosing that may precipitate strokes or thromboembolic events and bleedings, respectively. Our objective was to analyze the appropriateness of DOAC dosing according to the summaries of product characteristics (SmPC). Furthermore, determinants for inappropriate prescribing were investigated. Retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients aged ≥60 years with at least one DOAC intake during hospital stay. Descriptive analyses were used to summarize the characteristics of the study population. Chi-square test was used to evaluate differences between DOACs. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess determinants for inappropriate prescribing. For the 772 included patients, inappropriate dosing occurred in 25.0% of hospitalizations with 23.4, 21.9, and 29.7% for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, respectively ( = 0.084). Underdosing was most prevalent for apixaban (24.5%) compared to dabigatran (14.0%) and rivaroxaban (12.8%), < 0.001. In 67.1% (apixaban), 26.7% (dabigatran), and 51.2% (rivaroxaban) of underdosed DOAC cases according to the SmPC, the dose would be considered appropriate according to the European Heart Rhytm Association (EHRA) guidelines. Overdosing was observed in 4.5% (apixaban), 4.7% (dabigatran), and 7.7% (rivaroxaban) of patients. For all DOACs, our analysis showed an age ≥80 years ( = 0.036), use of apixaban ( = 0.026), DOAC use before hospitalization ( = 0.001), intermediate renal function ( = 0.014), and use of narcotic analgesics ( = 0.019) to be associated with a higher rate of inappropriate prescribing. Undergoing surgery was associated with a lower odds of inappropriate prescribing ( = 0.012). For rivaroxaban, use of medication for hypothyroidism ( = 0.027) and the reduced dose ( < 0.001) were determinants for inappropriate prescribing. Treatment of venous thromboembolism was associated with less errors ( = 0.002). For apixaban, severe renal insufficiency ( < 0.001) and initiation in hospital ( = 0.016) were associated with less and the reduced dose ( < 0.001) with more inappropriate prescribing. No determinants were found in the dabigatran subgroup. Inappropriate DOAC prescribing is frequent with underdosing being the most common drug related problem when using the SmPC as reference. More appropriate prescriptions were found when taking the EHRA guidelines into account. Analysis of determinants of inappropriate prescribing yielded insights in the risk factors associated with inappropriate DOAC prescriptions.

摘要

需要给予直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)适当剂量,以避免分别可能引发中风或血栓栓塞事件及出血的剂量不足和过量情况。我们的目的是根据产品特性摘要(SmPC)分析DOAC给药的适当性。此外,还对不适当处方的决定因素进行了调查。对住院期间年龄≥60岁且至少服用过一次DOAC的患者进行回顾性队列研究。采用描述性分析来总结研究人群的特征。使用卡方检验来评估不同DOAC之间的差异。进行二元逻辑回归分析以评估不适当处方的决定因素。对于纳入的772例患者,25.0%的住院治疗存在剂量不当情况,达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班分别为23.4%、21.9%和29.7%(P = 0.084)。与达比加群(14.0%)和利伐沙班(12.8%)相比,阿哌沙班的剂量不足最为普遍(24.5%),P < 0.001。根据SmPC,在67.1%(阿哌沙班)、26.7%(达比加群)和51.2%(利伐沙班)的剂量不足DOAC病例中,根据欧洲心律协会(EHRA)指南,该剂量将被视为适当。4.5%(阿哌沙班)、4.7%(达比加群)和7.7%(利伐沙班)的患者出现剂量过量。对于所有DOAC,我们的分析显示年龄≥80岁(P = 0.036)、使用阿哌沙班(P = 0.026)、住院前使用DOAC(P = 0.001)、中度肾功能(P = 0.014)以及使用麻醉性镇痛药(P = 0.019)与更高的不适当处方率相关。接受手术与较低的不适当处方几率相关(P = 0.012)。对于利伐沙班,使用治疗甲状腺功能减退的药物(P = 0.027)和剂量降低(P < 0.001)是不适当处方的决定因素。静脉血栓栓塞的治疗与较少的错误相关(P = 0.002)。对于阿哌沙班,严重肾功能不全(P < 0.001)和住院时开始用药(P = 0.016)与较少的不适当处方相关,而剂量降低(P < 0.001)与更多的不适当处方相关。在达比加群亚组中未发现决定因素。以SmPC为参考时,不适当的DOAC处方很常见,剂量不足是最常见的药物相关问题。考虑EHRA指南时发现了更适当的处方。对不适当处方决定因素的分析揭示了与不适当DOAC处方相关的风险因素。

相似文献

1
Appropriateness of DOAC Prescribing Before and During Hospital Admission and Analysis of Determinants for Inappropriate Prescribing.住院前及住院期间直接口服抗凝剂处方的适宜性及不适当处方的决定因素分析
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Oct 30;9:1220. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01220. eCollection 2018.
2
Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Compliance with Dose Level Guidelines in Patients Aged 80 Years and Over.直接口服抗凝剂与非瓣膜性心房颤动:80 岁及以上患者的剂量水平指南依从性。
Drugs Aging. 2021 Oct;38(10):939-950. doi: 10.1007/s40266-021-00883-1. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
3
Determinants for under- and overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants and physicians' implementation of clinical pharmacists' recommendations.直接口服抗凝剂剂量不足和过量的决定因素以及医生对临床药师建议的执行情况。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;88(2):753-763. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15017. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
Appropriateness of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban Prescribing in Qatar: A 5-Year Experience.达比加群酯和利伐沙班在卡塔尔处方中的适宜性:五年经验
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Mar;23(2):155-161. doi: 10.1177/1074248417731536. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
5
Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant dosing in atrial fibrillation patients is associated with prescriptions for outpatients rather than inpatients: a single-center retrospective cohort study.心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝药剂量不当与门诊患者而非住院患者的处方有关:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2020 Feb 11;6:2. doi: 10.1186/s40780-020-0157-z. eCollection 2020.
6
Burden of Inappropriate Prescription of Direct Oral Anticoagulants at Hospital Admission and Discharge in the Elderly: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Study.老年患者住院和出院时直接口服抗凝剂不适当处方的负担:一项前瞻性观察性多中心研究。
Drugs Aging. 2019 Nov;36(11):1047-1055. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00710-8.
7
Quality of clinical direct oral anticoagulant prescribing and identification of risk factors for inappropriate prescriptions.临床直接口服抗凝剂处方质量及不适当处方风险因素的识别
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;86(8):1567-1574. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14264. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
8
Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand.泰国一家三级护理医院中房颤患者直接口服抗凝剂给药的适宜性。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Sep 11;16:100507. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100507. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation according to the drug labelling and the EHRA Practical Guide.根据药物标签和 EHRA 实践指南,评估房颤患者直接口服抗凝剂剂量的适宜性。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 1;328:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.062. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
10
Characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulants and new insights into inappropriate dosing: results from the French National Prospective Registry: PAFF.直接口服抗凝剂治疗的心房颤动患者的特征及不适当剂量的新认识:来自法国全国前瞻性注册研究:PAFF。
Europace. 2023 Oct 5;25(10). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad302.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Effect of Concomitant Azoles on Anticoagulant Prescribing Practices in Transplant Patients: A National Survey of Clinicians.评估唑类药物对移植患者抗凝处方实践的影响:一项针对临床医生的全国性调查。
J Pharm Technol. 2025 Jun 30:87551225251348830. doi: 10.1177/87551225251348830.
2
Does hospitalisation improve oral anticoagulant optimisation in patients with atrial fibrillation?住院治疗能否改善房颤患者的口服抗凝治疗优化情况?
Eur J Clin Invest. 2025 Apr;55(4):e70011. doi: 10.1111/eci.70011. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
3
Edoxaban pharmacokinetics during in vitro continuous renal replacement therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.2018 年欧洲心脏病学会关于非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在心房颤动患者中应用的实用指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Apr 21;39(16):1330-1393. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy136.
2
The Psychology of Clinical Decision Making - Implications for Medication Use.临床决策心理学——对药物使用的启示
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):689-691. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1714987.
3
Inappropriate doses of direct oral anticoagulants in real-world clinical practice: prevalence and associated factors. A subanalysis of the FANTASIIA Registry.
依度沙班在体外持续肾脏替代治疗期间的药代动力学。
BMC Nephrol. 2024 Oct 10;25(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03777-7.
4
Potentially inappropriate prescribing in multimorbid and polymedicated older adults with AF: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.潜在不适当处方在多合并症和多药物治疗的老年 AF 患者中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs Aging. 2024 Jan;41(1):13-30. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01078-6. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
5
A combination of Beers and STOPP criteria better detects potentially inappropriate medications use among older hospitalized patients with chronic diseases and polypharmacy: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Beers 标准和 STOPP 标准相结合能更好地发现患有慢性病和多种药物治疗的老年住院患者中潜在的不适当药物使用:一项多中心横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 25;23(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03743-2.
6
Retrospective analysis of gastrointestinal bleedings with direct oral anticoagulants reported to EudraVigilance.对向欧洲药品管理局药物警戒数据库报告的使用直接口服抗凝剂导致胃肠道出血情况的回顾性分析。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2023 Jun;396(6):1143-1153. doi: 10.1007/s00210-023-02388-7. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
7
Outcomes and drivers of inappropriate dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOACs)在房颤患者中不适当剂量的结果和驱动因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart. 2023 Jan 11;109(3):178-185. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321114.
8
Appropriateness of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Dosing According to Different Prescription Guides Used in Belgian Ambulatory Care.根据在比利时门诊护理中使用的不同处方指南,非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂的剂量是否合适。
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Sep;42(9):775-786. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01190-2. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
9
Prevalence, contributory factors and severity of medication errors associated with direct-acting oral anticoagulants in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝药物相关的成年患者药物错误的流行率、促成因素和严重程度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Apr;78(4):623-645. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03212-y. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
10
A retrospective study on the evaluation of the appropriateness of oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.回顾性研究评估心房颤动患者口服抗凝治疗的适宜性。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 11;16(11):e0259199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259199. eCollection 2021.
真实世界临床实践中直接口服抗凝剂的不适当剂量:流行率及相关因素。 FANTASIIA 注册研究的一项亚分析。
Europace. 2018 Oct 1;20(10):1577-1583. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux316.
4
Atrial fibrillation and use of antithrombotic medications in older people: A population-based study.老年人心房颤动和抗血栓药物的使用:一项基于人群的研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15;249:173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.07.012.
5
Effect of Renal Function on Dosing of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.肾功能对非瓣膜性心房颤动患者使用非维生素K拮抗剂直接口服抗凝剂剂量的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Feb;52(2):147-153. doi: 10.1177/1060028017728295. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Direct oral anticoagulants in patients with chronic kidney disease: patient selection and special considerations.慢性肾脏病患者使用直接口服抗凝剂:患者选择及特殊考量
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2017 Jun 12;10:135-143. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S105771. eCollection 2017.
7
Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Dosing in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Renal Dysfunction.非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在伴有肾功能障碍的心房颤动患者中的剂量调整。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 13;69(23):2779-2790. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.600.
8
Utilization and prescribing patterns of direct oral anticoagulants.直接口服抗凝剂的使用情况及处方模式。
Int J Gen Med. 2017 Mar 10;10:87-94. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S129235. eCollection 2017.
9
Off-Label Dosing of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Adverse Outcomes: The ORBIT-AF II Registry.非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂的标签外剂量与不良结局:ORBIT-AF II 注册研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 20;68(24):2597-2604. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.966.
10
Prescribing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Based on Estimation of Renal Function Using Standard and Modified Cockcroft-Gault Equations: A Retrospective Analysis.基于标准和改良Cockcroft-Gault方程估算肾功能的心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝剂的处方:一项回顾性分析。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Sep-Oct;69(5):409-414. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v69i5.1596. Epub 2016 Oct 31.