Suppr超能文献

HEART评分的评分者间信度。

Inter-rater Reliability of the HEART Score.

作者信息

Gershon Colin A, Yagapen Annick N, Lin Amber, Yanez David, Sun Benjamin C

机构信息

Center for Policy Research-Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2019 May;26(5):552-555. doi: 10.1111/acem.13665. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The HEART score is a risk stratification tool for suspected acute coronary syndrome and contains several subjective components. A single previous study found good inter-rater reliability. Our objective was to assess the inter-rater reliability of the HEART score in an external prospective cohort.

METHODS

We prospectively collected paired, independent physician ratings of the HEART score for patients > 20 years of age presenting to the emergency department with chest pain for which an ECG and troponin were ordered. Two emergency physicians independently provided HEART scores for each unique patient. The primary outcome, the HEART score, was dichotomized by low risk (0–3) vs non- low risk (4–10). Additional outcomes included the HEART score across the entire scale (0–10) and subcomponents of the HEART score (e.g., history, electrocardiogram, risk factors; score of 0–2 for each). We calculated kappa statistics and percent agreement for all outcomes.

RESULTS

We collected paired physician HEART score ratings on 311 patients from October 2017 to April 2018. The mean HEART score was 3.5 (SD 1.9). About half (49.2%) of our patients had a HEART score of ≤ 3, and 50.8% had a HEART score > 3. The kappa score for “low risk” (HEART ≤ 3) was 0.68 (95%CI: 0.60 – 0.77). There was 84.2% agreement between physicians on this variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates there is substantial inter-rater reliability among emergency department physicians in identifying patients at low risk of acute coronary syndrome using the HEART score.

摘要

背景

HEART评分是一种用于疑似急性冠状动脉综合征的风险分层工具,包含几个主观因素。此前有一项研究发现该评分具有良好的评分者间信度。我们的目的是在一个外部前瞻性队列中评估HEART评分的评分者间信度。

方法

我们前瞻性地收集了年龄大于20岁、因胸痛到急诊科就诊且接受了心电图和肌钙蛋白检查的患者的HEART评分的配对独立医生评分数据。两名急诊科医生分别独立为每位患者提供HEART评分。主要结局指标即HEART评分,根据低风险(0 - 3分)和非低风险(4 - 10分)进行二分法分类。其他结局指标包括整个评分范围(0 - 10分)的HEART评分以及HEART评分的子成分(如病史、心电图、风险因素;每个子成分评分为0 - 2分)。我们计算了所有结局指标的kappa统计量和一致性百分比。

结果

我们在2017年10月至2018年4月期间收集了311例患者的配对医生HEART评分数据。HEART评分的平均值为3.5(标准差1.9)。约一半(49.2%)患者的HEART评分为≤3分;50.8%患者的HEART评分>3分。“低风险”(HEART≤3分)的kappa评分为0.68(95%可信区间:0.60 - 0.77)。医生们在该变量上的一致性为84.2%。

结论

我们的研究表明,急诊科医生使用HEART评分识别急性冠状动脉综合征低风险患者时,存在较高程度的评分者间信度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6250/6517079/33658099b834/nihms-997453-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Inter-rater Reliability of the HEART Score.HEART评分的评分者间信度。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 May;26(5):552-555. doi: 10.1111/acem.13665. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

3
Automated computation of the HEART score with the GPT-4 large language model.使用GPT-4大语言模型自动计算HEART评分
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul;93:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.03.065. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
8

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验