Pawlukiewicz Alec J, Geringer Matthew R, Davis W Tyler, Nassery Daniel R, April Michael D, Streitz Matthew J, Hyams Jessica M, Martin Alex W, Martin Sadie A, Oliver Joshua J
Department of Emergency Medicine San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium San Antonio Texas USA.
Department of Internal Medicine San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium San Antonio Texas USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Apr 29;3(3):e12732. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12732. eCollection 2022 Jun.
This study investigated the interrater reliability of the history component of the HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk, troponin) score between physicians in emergency medicine (EM) and internal medicine (IM) at 1 tertiary-care center.
We conducted a retrospective, secondary analysis of 60 encounters selected randomly from a database of 417 patients with chest pain presenting from January to June 2016 to an urban tertiary-care center. A total of 4 raters (1 EM attending, 1 EM resident, 1 IM attending, and 1 IM resident) scored the previously abstracted history data from these encounters.The primary outcome was the interrater agreement of HEART score history components, as measured by kappa coefficient, between EM and IM attending physicians. Secondary outcomes included the agreement between attending and resident physicians, overall agreement, pairwise percent agreement, and differences in scores assigned.
The kappa value for the EM attending physician and IM attending physician was 0.33 with 55% agreement. Interrater agreement of the other pairs was substantial between EM attending and resident but was otherwise fair to moderate. Percent agreement between the other pairs ranged from 48.3% to 80%. There was a significant difference in scores assigned and the subgroup in which there was disagreement between the raters demonstrated significantly higher scores by the EM attending and resident when compared to the IM attending.
This study demonstrates fair agreement between EM and IM attending physicians in the history component of the HEART score with significantly higher scores by the EM attending physician in cases of disagreement at 1 tertiary-care center.
本研究调查了一家三级医疗中心的急诊医学(EM)医生和内科(IM)医生之间,HEART(病史、心电图、年龄、风险、肌钙蛋白)评分中病史部分的评分者间信度。
我们对2016年1月至6月间到一家城市三级医疗中心就诊的417例胸痛患者数据库中随机选取的60次诊疗进行了回顾性二次分析。共有4名评分者(1名急诊医学主治医生、1名急诊医学住院医生、1名内科主治医生和1名内科住院医生)对这些诊疗中之前提取的病史数据进行评分。主要结局是通过kappa系数衡量的急诊医学和内科主治医生之间HEART评分病史部分的评分者间一致性。次要结局包括主治医生和住院医生之间的一致性、总体一致性、两两百分比一致性以及评分差异。
急诊医学主治医生和内科主治医生的kappa值为0.33,一致性为55%。急诊医学主治医生和住院医生之间其他配对的评分者间一致性较高,但在其他情况下为中等至良好。其他配对之间的百分比一致性范围为48.3%至80%。评分存在显著差异,评分者之间存在分歧的亚组中,急诊医学主治医生和住院医生给出的分数明显高于内科主治医生。
本研究表明,在一家三级医疗中心,急诊医学和内科主治医生在HEART评分的病史部分存在中等程度的一致性,在存在分歧的情况下,急诊医学主治医生给出的分数明显更高。