Ferreira Cátia Liliana Martins, Guerra Cláudia Maria Lopes, Silva Ana Isabel Teixeira Jesus, do Rosário Helena Rafaela Vieira, Pereira Maria Beatriz Ferreira Leite de Oliveira
Gynecology and Obstetrics Service, Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.
Institute of Education, University of Minho, Minho, Portugal.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 Feb;41(2):68-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675613. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
To access the benefits or harms of an exercise program, based on the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines, on the mode of delivery, duration and onset of labor.
A study performed at the Hospital Senhora da Oliveira between October 2015 and February 2017. This was a quasi-experimental study involving 255 women divided into two groups: an intervention group engaged in a controlled and supervised exercise program during pregnancy ( = 99), and a control group that did not participate in the exercise program ( = 156). Data were collected in two stages: during the 1 trimester biochemical screening (before the beginning of the program), through a written questionnaire, and after delivery, from the medical files of the patients. The significance level in the present study was 5% ( = 0.05).
The control group had higher odds of induced labor (odds ratio [OR] 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.42-5.17; = 0.003), when compared with women who underwent the intervention. No differences were found between the groups in instrumental vaginal deliveries, cesarean rate, time until the beginning of the active phase, duration of the active phase, and duration of the second stage of labor.
The implementation of a controlled and supervised exercise program in pregnancy was associated with significantly lower odds of induced deliveries.
根据美国妇产科医师学会当前指南,评估一项运动计划对分娩方式、产程及分娩发动的益处或危害。
2015年10月至2017年2月在奥利维拉圣母医院开展一项研究。这是一项准实验研究,纳入255名女性,分为两组:干预组在孕期参与一项有控制且有监督的运动计划(n = 99),对照组未参与运动计划(n = 156)。数据分两个阶段收集:在孕早期生化筛查时(在计划开始前),通过书面问卷收集,以及在分娩后,从患者病历中收集。本研究的显著性水平为5%(α = 0.05)。
与接受干预的女性相比,对照组引产几率更高(优势比[OR] 2.71;95%置信区间[CI]:1.42 - 5.17;P = 0.003)。两组在器械助产分娩、剖宫产率、活跃期开始时间、活跃期时长及第二产程时长方面未发现差异。
孕期实施有控制且有监督的运动计划与引产几率显著降低相关。