• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺泡表面活性物质阿尔法与贝拉克坦治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的回顾性成本分析

Poractant Alfa Versus Beractant for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Cost Analysis.

作者信息

Brown Sara, Hurren Jeff, Sartori Heidi

出版信息

J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):367-371. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-23.5.367.

DOI:10.5863/1551-6776-23.5.367
PMID:30429690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6213622/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine the average medication cost per patient of poractant alfa and beractant, and to compare the outcomes of treatment with these agents.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational, cohort study of patients who received surfactant, before and after an institutional formulary change from beractant to poractant alfa. The primary outcome was the average medication cost per case. Secondary measures were clinical outcomes, including duration of respiratory support, length of hospital stay, and the occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were enrolled; 38 were treated with poractant alfa and 76 patients were treated with beractant. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The average medication cost per patient was $1756.44 ± $1030.06 and $1329.78 ± $705.64 for poractant alfa and beractant, respectively (p = 0.011). Patients treated with poractant alfa had a shorter length of stay (45.0 ± 30.5 days) than patients treated with beractant (65.1 ± 37.1 days) (p = 0.010). Rates of pneumothoraces, pulmonary hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, and mortality did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an unanticipated increase in drug cost with poractant alfa compared to beractant.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定接受猪肺磷脂和固尔苏治疗的每位患者的平均药物费用,并比较使用这些药物的治疗结果。

方法

我们对在机构处方从固尔苏更换为猪肺磷脂之前和之后接受表面活性剂治疗的患者进行了一项回顾性观察队列研究。主要结局是每例患者的平均药物费用。次要指标为临床结局,包括呼吸支持持续时间、住院时间和并发症的发生情况。

结果

共纳入114例患者;38例接受猪肺磷脂治疗,76例接受固尔苏治疗。两组间基线特征相似。猪肺磷脂和固尔苏治疗的每位患者平均药物费用分别为1756.44美元±1030.06美元和1329.78美元±705.64美元(p = 0.011)。接受猪肺磷脂治疗的患者住院时间(45.0±30.5天)比接受固尔苏治疗的患者(65.1±37.1天)短(p = 0.010)。两组间气胸、肺出血、坏死性小肠结肠炎、脑室内出血和死亡率无显著差异。

结论

我们发现,与固尔苏相比,猪肺磷脂的药物成本意外增加。

相似文献

1
Poractant Alfa Versus Beractant for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Cost Analysis.肺泡表面活性物质阿尔法与贝拉克坦治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的回顾性成本分析
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):367-371. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-23.5.367.
2
Poractant alfa versus beractant for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study.肺泡表面活性物质阿尔法与贝可施坦治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的回顾性队列研究
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Oct;49(10):839-44. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12300. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
3
A randomized, controlled trial of poractant alfa versus beractant in the treatment of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.随机、对照试验表明,肺表面活性物质制剂(猪肺磷脂)在治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征方面优于牛肺表面活性剂(固尔苏)。
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Feb;29(2):95-100. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295648. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
4
Patent ductus arteriosus hemodynamics in very premature infants treated with poractant alfa or beractant for respiratory distress syndrome.肺表面活性剂蛋白制剂治疗呼吸窘迫综合征的极早产儿动脉导管未闭血流动力学
J Perinatol. 2010 Oct;30(10):671-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.21. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
5
Poractant alfa and beractant treatment of very premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome.猪肺磷脂和牛肺磷脂治疗有呼吸窘迫综合征的极早产儿。
J Perinatol. 2010 Oct;30(10):665-70. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.20. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
6
A randomized, multicenter masked comparison trial of poractant alfa (Curosurf) versus beractant (Survanta) in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.一项关于猪肺磷脂(珂立苏)与贝拉克坦(固尔苏)治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的随机、多中心、双盲对照试验。
Am J Perinatol. 2004 Apr;21(3):109-19. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-823779.
7
Efficacy of porcine versus bovine surfactants for preterm newborns with respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.猪源与牛源肺泡表面活性物质治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2011 Dec;128(6):e1588-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1395. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
8
Efficacy of surfactant-TA, calfactant and poractant alfa for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective study.表面活性物质-TA、珂立苏和固尔苏用于早产新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效:一项回顾性研究
Yonsei Med J. 2015 Mar;56(2):433-9. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.2.433.
9
Comparison of efficacy between beractant and poractant alfa in respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants (28-33 weeks gestational age) using the less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) technique: A randomized controlled trial.使用微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)技术比较贝拉克坦和猪肺磷脂对孕周28 - 33周早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Perinatol. 2024 Apr 12. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-01962-y.
10
A pharmacoeconomic analysis of in-hospital costs resulting from reintubation in preterm infants treated with lucinactant, beractant, or poractant alfa.对接受卢西纳可、贝拉克坦或泊拉坦阿尔法治疗的早产儿再次插管导致的住院费用进行的药物经济学分析。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jul;17(3):220-7. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-17.3.220.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of efficacy between beractant and poractant alfa in respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants (28-33 weeks gestational age) using the less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) technique: A randomized controlled trial.使用微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)技术比较贝拉克坦和猪肺磷脂对孕周28 - 33周早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Perinatol. 2024 Apr 12. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-01962-y.
2
Comparing the clinical and economic efficiency of four natural surfactants in treating infants with respiratory distress syndrome.比较四种天然表面活性剂治疗呼吸窘迫综合征婴儿的临床和经济效益。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 30;18(6):e0286997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286997. eCollection 2023.
3
Health Economic Studies of Surfactant Replacement Therapy in Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Literature Review.新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征表面活性剂替代疗法的卫生经济学研究:一项系统文献综述
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 May;7(3):359-371. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00399-x. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
4
Analysis of diagnosing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome with lung ultrasound score.用肺部超声评分诊断新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的分析
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 May-Jun;38(5):1101-1106. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.5.5202.
5
Surfactant Stock Optimization for Cost Minimization in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.优化表面活性剂库存以降低新生儿重症监护病房的成本。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Dec 1;2021:8346584. doi: 10.1155/2021/8346584. eCollection 2021.
6
Cost of nitric oxide therapy in neonates.新生儿一氧化氮治疗的成本。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020 Oct 13;4(1):e000776. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000776. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of exogenous pulmonary surfactants on mortality rate in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.外源性肺表面活性物质对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征死亡率的影响:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Oct;34:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
2
Outcomes for extremely premature infants.极早产儿的预后。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Jun;120(6):1337-51. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000705.
3
Surfactant replacement therapy for preterm and term neonates with respiratory distress.表面活性物质替代疗法治疗有呼吸窘迫的早产儿和足月儿。
Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):156-63. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3443. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
4
Poractant alfa versus beractant for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study.肺泡表面活性物质阿尔法与贝可施坦治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的回顾性队列研究
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Oct;49(10):839-44. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12300. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
5
Comparative effectiveness of surfactant preparations in premature infants.早产儿表面活性剂制剂的疗效比较。
J Pediatr. 2013 Oct;163(4):955-60.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.053. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
6
European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants--2013 update.欧洲早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征管理共识指南——2013 年更新版。
Neonatology. 2013;103(4):353-68. doi: 10.1159/000349928. Epub 2013 May 31.
7
A Cost Minimization Comparison of Two Surfactants-Beractant and Poractant alfa-Based Upon Prospectively Designed, Comparative Clinical Trial Data.基于前瞻性设计的比较临床试验数据,对两种表面活性剂(贝拉克坦和猪肺磷脂)进行成本最小化比较。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Apr;9(2):117-25. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-9.2.117.
8
Efficacy of porcine versus bovine surfactants for preterm newborns with respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.猪源与牛源肺泡表面活性物质治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2011 Dec;128(6):e1588-95. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1395. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
9
A randomized, controlled trial of poractant alfa versus beractant in the treatment of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.随机、对照试验表明,肺表面活性物质制剂(猪肺磷脂)在治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征方面优于牛肺表面活性剂(固尔苏)。
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Feb;29(2):95-100. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295648. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
10
Complications among premature neonates treated with beractant and poractant alfa.肺表面活性物质制剂(牛肺表面活性剂和猪肺表面活性剂)治疗的早产儿的并发症。
Indian J Pediatr. 2010 Jul;77(7):751-4. doi: 10.1007/s12098-010-0097-y. Epub 2010 Jun 29.