Shakir Asiya K, Altaf Muhammad Adnan
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep-Oct;23(5):390-394. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-23.5.390.
Erythromycin (ERY) is used in the treatment of gastroparesis; however, this medication is associated with serious side effects, such as cardiac arrhythmias and consequent cardiorespiratory arrest. Azithromycin (AZM) has been suggested as an alternative to ERY as a result of its improved safety profile. Intravenous ERY (1 mg/kg) is administered during antroduodenal motility studies to induce migrating motor complexes (MMCs), the presence or absence of which helps diagnose motility disorders like gastroparesis and gastrointestinal dysmotility. However, there are no pediatric studies comparing the effects of AZM and ERY on antroduodenal pressure profiles. The goal of this study is to determine if AZM is comparable in inducing MMCs in pediatric patients undergoing antroduodenal motility studies.
We performed a retrospective chart analysis of gastric and small bowel manometric data in 2 adolescent patients, both age 15 years, who were given AZM (1 mg/kg) during antroduodenal motility studies. The pressure profiles obtained during motility studies were compared to those of patients of similar age and symptomology who were given the standard intravenous ERY dose during motility studies. We then compared the total duration of effect, mean amplitude of contractions, number of cycles per minute, and duration of highest antral and duodenal contractions.
Intravenous AZM induces migrating motor contractions in the stomach followed by contractions in the small intestine. The mean amplitude of the stomach contractions was 259 mm Hg in patients who received AZM vs 241 mm Hg in patients who received ERY. The mean amplitude of small intestinal MMCs was 68 mm Hg in patients who received AZI and 72 mm Hg in patients who received ERY. Additionally, the frequency and duration of stomach and small intestinal contractions were also similar in the 2 groups.
Intravenous AZM has similar prokinetic effects to intravenous ERY. Our study suggests that AZM is a suitable alternative to ERY in inducing MMCs without the concerning side effects related to ERY and may potentially be used in the management of gastroparesis and other small bowel motility disorders. However, larger prospective studies are required to better understand the long-term efficacy of AZM.
红霉素(ERY)用于治疗胃轻瘫;然而,这种药物会引发严重的副作用,如心律失常以及随之而来的心肺骤停。阿奇霉素(AZM)因其更好的安全性被建议作为ERY的替代药物。在十二指肠动力研究期间静脉注射ERY(1毫克/千克)以诱导移行性运动复合波(MMC),MMC的有无有助于诊断诸如胃轻瘫和胃肠动力障碍等动力紊乱疾病。然而,尚无儿科研究比较AZM和ERY对十二指肠压力曲线的影响。本研究的目的是确定在接受十二指肠动力研究的儿科患者中,AZM诱导MMC的效果是否与ERY相当。
我们对2名15岁青少年患者在十二指肠动力研究期间给予AZM(1毫克/千克)后的胃和小肠测压数据进行了回顾性图表分析。将动力研究期间获得的压力曲线与在动力研究期间接受标准静脉ERY剂量的年龄和症状相似的患者的压力曲线进行比较。然后我们比较了作用的总持续时间、收缩的平均幅度、每分钟的周期数以及胃窦和十二指肠最高收缩的持续时间。
静脉注射AZM可诱导胃部的移行性运动收缩,随后是小肠收缩。接受AZM的患者胃收缩的平均幅度为259毫米汞柱,而接受ERY的患者为241毫米汞柱。接受AZI的患者小肠MMC的平均幅度为68毫米汞柱,接受ERY的患者为72毫米汞柱。此外,两组胃和小肠收缩的频率和持续时间也相似。
静脉注射AZM与静脉注射ERY具有相似的促动力作用。我们的研究表明,AZM是诱导MMC时ERY的合适替代药物,不会产生与ERY相关的不良副作用,可能可用于胃轻瘫和其他小肠动力障碍的治疗。然而,需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来更好地了解AZM的长期疗效。