Suppr超能文献

血管穿刺部位对心内膜心肌活检操作时间的影响。

Impact of vascular access site on procedural time of endomyocardial biopsy.

作者信息

Mukai Kentaro, Nakano Yusuke, Mizuno Tomofumi, Niwa Toru, Wakabayashi Hirokazu, Suzuki Akihiro, Watanabe Atsushi, Ando Hirohiko, Murotani Kenta, Waseda Katsuhisa, Amano Tetsuya

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazakokarimata, Nagakute, 480-1195, Aichi, Japan.

Division of Biostatistics, Clinical Research Center, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2019 May;34(5):793-800. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1298-y. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

Abstract

Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is widely used for the diagnosis of unexplained ventricular dysfunction and for assessment of cardiac allograft rejection. But, the impact of vascular access site on procedural time of EMB is not well-known. From February 2014 to May 2016, consecutive patients requiring EMB were prospectively enrolled in this study. Vascular access, by either the jugular or femoral vein, was randomly assigned. EMB was randomly performed by 3 pre-identified physicians based on practical experience in EMB. Each case was required to obtain at least 3 samples. The primary endpoint was to compare the total time spent in acquiring EMB from the right ventricular septum between the jugular and femoral vein access groups. The secondary endpoints were evaluation of each set (1st to 3rd attempt) of EMB times and safety. In addition, factors affecting the EMB procedural times were evaluated. A total of 49 consecutive patients requiring EMB (3.9 attempts/patient) were enrolled (the jugular group: 23, the femoral group: 26), and 156 myocardial samples (3.2 samples/patient) were obtained. There were no significant differences in total biopsy procedural time between the 2 groups (16.3 ± 7.4 vs. 20.8 ± 9.9 min, p = 0.075). Independent predictors for longer procedural time of the 1st attempt included femoral access, non-expert operators, and larger right atrium according to multiple linear regression analysis. The complication rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups, except for catheter kinking as a technical factor. Total biopsy time was not significantly different between the jugular and femoral venous access groups. However, the 1st attempt EMB procedural time by non-expert operators was longer when using the femoral approach, especially in cases involving a larger right atrium diameter.

摘要

心内膜心肌活检(EMB)广泛应用于不明原因的心室功能障碍的诊断以及心脏移植排斥反应的评估。但是,血管穿刺部位对EMB操作时间的影响尚不清楚。2014年2月至2016年5月,连续纳入需要进行EMB的患者进行本研究。通过颈静脉或股静脉进行血管穿刺,随机分配。由3名根据EMB实践经验预先确定的医生随机进行EMB操作。每个病例至少需要获取3个样本。主要终点是比较颈静脉和股静脉穿刺组从右心室间隔获取EMB的总时间。次要终点是评估每组(第1次至第3次尝试)的EMB时间和安全性。此外,还评估了影响EMB操作时间的因素。共纳入49例连续需要进行EMB的患者(每位患者平均3.9次尝试)(颈静脉组:23例,股静脉组:26例),共获取156份心肌样本(每位患者平均3.2份样本)。两组之间的总活检操作时间无显著差异(16.3±7.4分钟 vs. 20.8±9.9分钟,p = 0.075)。根据多元线性回归分析,首次尝试操作时间较长的独立预测因素包括股静脉穿刺、非专业操作人员以及右心房较大。两组之间的并发症发生率无显著差异,但导管扭结作为技术因素除外。颈静脉和股静脉穿刺组之间的总活检时间无显著差异。然而,非专业操作人员使用股静脉途径进行首次EMB操作的时间较长,尤其是在右心房直径较大的情况下。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验