• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经会阴超声诊断胎儿枕先露胎位

Diagnosis of fetal occiput position using transperineal ultrasound.

作者信息

Dimassi Kaouther, Temessek Helmi, Ben Amor Anissa, Triki Amel

出版信息

Tunis Med. 2018 Jun;96(6):360-365.

PMID:30430474
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare Transperineal (TP) and Transabdominal (TA) ultrasound in the assessment of fetal head position during the second stage of labor.

METHOD

A prospective comparative Study including low risk parturients. The assessment of fetal head position was performed for each patient at full dilation. The ultrasound examination was performed by one examiner using TP technique first then TA. A routine digital vaginal examination was performed by a different examiner blinded to ultrasound findings. Considering TA as reference, the three methods were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty two patients were enrolled in the study group. Agreement between the clinical examination and TA ultrasound was average with Kappa index = 0.579. Agreement between TA and TP Ultrasound was good with Kappa index = 0.766. TP technique was accurate in the diagnosis of fetal head position (sensitivity =91.3%, specificity=98.38%, PPV=87.5%, NPV=98.91%). TA ultrasound was the most reliable method in case of high presentations. For lower fetal presentations, the TP approach was more relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

Assuming that an accurate diagnosis of fetal head position is required before any instrumental delivery where, by definition, fetal presentation is engaged, the TP ultrasound is advised. In a single time this technique provides the necessary information about the station, and the position of the fetal head.

摘要

目的

比较经会阴超声(TP)和经腹超声(TA)在分娩第二产程中评估胎头位置的效果。

方法

一项纳入低风险产妇的前瞻性对照研究。在宫口开全时对每位患者进行胎头位置评估。由一名检查者先采用TP技术然后采用TA技术进行超声检查。由另一名对超声检查结果不知情的检查者进行常规的阴道指检。以TA超声作为参照,对三种方法进行比较。

结果

52例患者纳入研究组。临床检查与TA超声之间的一致性一般,Kappa指数=0.579。TA超声与TP超声之间的一致性良好,Kappa指数=0.766。TP技术在诊断胎头位置方面准确(敏感性=91.3%,特异性=98.38%,阳性预测值=87.5%,阴性预测值=98.91%)。对于高先露情况,TA超声是最可靠的方法。对于较低的胎儿先露情况,TP方法更适用。

结论

假设在任何器械助产之前都需要准确诊断胎头位置,而根据定义此时胎儿先露已衔接,建议采用TP超声。该技术能一次性提供关于胎头的位置及入盆情况的必要信息。

相似文献

1
Diagnosis of fetal occiput position using transperineal ultrasound.经会阴超声诊断胎儿枕先露胎位
Tunis Med. 2018 Jun;96(6):360-365.
2
Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor: how reliable is the transperineal approach?分娩第二产程中胎儿枕部位置的超声评估:经会阴途径的可靠性如何?
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Nov;28(16):1985-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.974539. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
3
Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor.产时胎儿头部位置II:第二产程中经阴道指诊与经腹超声评估的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):264-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x.
4
Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study.超声对真空吸引分娩结局的预测:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):69.e1-69.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 19.
5
Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor.产时胎儿头部位置I:活跃期经阴道指诊与经腹超声评估的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):258-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x.
6
Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.预测初产妇第二产程延长的自发性阴道分娩:产时超声的价值。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):642.e1-642.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.045. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
7
Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.超声判断的产程进展在需要剖宫产的产妇和引产经阴道分娩的产妇中有所不同。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):335.e1-335.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.040. Epub 2019 May 30.
8
Novel artificial intelligence approach for automatic differentiation of fetal occiput anterior and non-occiput anterior positions during labor.一种新的人工智能方法,用于在分娩期间自动区分胎儿枕前位和非枕前位。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;59(1):93-99. doi: 10.1002/uog.23739.
9
Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor.分娩期间数字检查与经腹超声检查确定胎儿头部位置的学习曲线比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;31(3):332-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.5267.
10
The feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound assessment in the labor room.产房内超声评估的可行性与准确性。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Oct;32(20):3442-3451. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1465553. Epub 2018 Apr 30.