Kohga Atsushi, Yajima Kiyoshige, Okumura Takuya, Yamashita Kimihiro, Isogaki Jun, Suzuki Kenji, Muramatsu Katsuaki, Komiyama Akira, Kawabe Akihiro
Division of Surgery, Fujinomiya City General Hospital, Fujinomiya, Japan.
Division of Radiology, Fujinomiya City General Hospital, Fujinomiya, Japan.
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Oct;12(4):423-428. doi: 10.1111/ases.12670. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
Recent meta-analyses revealed that laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is a feasible procedure even for patients with complicated appendicitis. More than a few patients with acute appendicitis arrive at the hospital during night shifts and have their operation postponed for various reasons. However, the feasibility and disadvantages of this so-called "postponed laparoscopic appendectomy" (PLA) remain controversial.
We included 149 patients who underwent LA for acute appendicitis within 48 h of diagnosis between January 2013 and May 2018. Patients were divided into an immediate LA group (patients who underwent LA within 4 h of diagnosis, n = 84) and a PLA group (patients who underwent LA 4-48 h after diagnosis, n = 65). Comparisons were made between these groups.
The preoperative characteristics of the patients in the immediate LA and PLA groups were not significantly different. Operative time was significantly longer in the PLA group than in the LA group (92.5 ± 40.8 vs 78.1 ± 29.7 min, P = 0.012). The incidence of postoperative complications (grade II or higher) was significantly greater in the PLA group than in the LA group (32.3% vs 17.8%, P = 0.041). Multivariate analysis revealed that a preoperative CT finding of periappendiceal fluid (P = 0.005, odds ratio = 4.71) and surgery 4-48 h after diagnosis (P = 0.005, odds ratio = 4.425) were independent risk factors of postoperative complications (grade II or higher).
For patients with acute appendicitis, surgeons should perform immediate LA, if that is the patient's preferred surgical treatment, as long as there is no special reason to postpone surgery.
最近的荟萃分析表明,即使对于患有复杂性阑尾炎的患者,腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)也是一种可行的手术方法。不少急性阑尾炎患者在夜班期间入院,由于各种原因手术被推迟。然而,这种所谓的“延期腹腔镜阑尾切除术”(PLA)的可行性和缺点仍存在争议。
我们纳入了2013年1月至2018年5月期间在诊断后48小时内接受LA治疗急性阑尾炎的149例患者。患者分为即刻LA组(诊断后4小时内接受LA的患者,n = 84)和PLA组(诊断后4 - 48小时接受LA的患者,n = 65)。对这两组进行比较。
即刻LA组和PLA组患者的术前特征无显著差异。PLA组的手术时间明显长于LA组(92.5±40.8对78.1±29.7分钟,P = 0.012)。PLA组术后并发症(II级或更高)的发生率明显高于LA组(32.3%对17.8%,P = 0.041)。多因素分析显示,术前CT发现阑尾周围积液(P = 0.005,优势比 = 4.71)和诊断后4 - 48小时进行手术(P = 0.005,优势比 = 4.425)是术后并发症(II级或更高)的独立危险因素。
对于急性阑尾炎患者,只要没有特殊理由推迟手术,如果这是患者首选的手术治疗方式,外科医生应进行即刻LA。