School of Chinese Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR 999077, P.R. China.
Division of General Practice, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China.
Mol Med Rep. 2019 Jan;19(1):477-489. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9638. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
Unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) is a highly lethal malignancy. Although numerous chemotherapeutic regimens are available, evidence regarding the survival extension, the life quality improvement, the associated risks and occurrence rates of adverse effects, is required. The effects of 19 chemotherapy regimens on survival and treatment‑associated toxicities in the context of APC treatment were comparatively assessed. A total of 23 randomized controlled trials were included in this network meta‑analysis. For overall survival, five regimens, Gemcitabine (Gem)+radiotherapy (Radio), Gem+cisplatin (Cis), Gem+erlotinib (Erl)+bevacizumab (Bev), Gem+capecitabine (Cap)+Erl, and Gem+exatecan, were the most effective treatments, according to their respective high surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Regarding the progression‑free survival, five regimens, including Gem+Radio, Gem+Erl+Bev, Gem+Cis, Gem+Cap+Erl and Gem+pemetrexed, were the most effective treatments based on their SUCRA probabilities. Each regimen exhibited advantages and disadvantages, and 14 common treatment‑associated toxicities were present in different proportions. The three principal toxic effects included haematological, gastrointestinal and constitutional symptoms. To improve survival, chemotherapy regimens with high SUCRA probabilities require prioritizing. Although treatment‑associated toxicities are unavoidable, the regimens presented toxicities in distinct proportions. Therefore, clinicians should assess the disease status of the patients, and balance the benefits and risks of the selected treatment.
不可切除的晚期胰腺癌(APC)是一种高度致命的恶性肿瘤。尽管有许多化疗方案可供选择,但仍需要评估这些方案在延长生存时间、改善生活质量、相关风险和不良反应发生率方面的效果。本研究旨在比较评估 19 种化疗方案在 APC 治疗中的生存获益和治疗相关毒性。本网络荟萃分析共纳入 23 项随机对照试验。对于总生存期,根据累积排序概率(SUCRA)得分,吉西他滨(Gem)+放疗(Radio)、Gem+顺铂(Cis)、Gem+厄洛替尼(Erl)+贝伐珠单抗(Bev)、Gem+卡培他滨(Cap)+Erl 和 Gem+依维莫司 5 种方案是最有效的治疗方法。对于无进展生存期,根据 SUCRA 得分,Gem+Radio、Gem+Erl+Bev、Gem+Cis、Gem+Cap+Erl 和 Gem+培美曲塞 5 种方案是最有效的治疗方法。每种方案都有其优缺点,14 种常见的治疗相关毒性以不同的比例存在。三种主要毒性作用包括血液学毒性、胃肠道毒性和全身毒性。为了提高生存获益,需要优先考虑 SUCRA 得分较高的化疗方案。尽管治疗相关毒性不可避免,但不同方案的毒性比例存在差异。因此,临床医生应评估患者的疾病状况,并权衡所选治疗的获益和风险。