Jordan K G
West J Med. 1988 Jul;149(1):47-57.
Neurosyphilis remains a source of perplexity for today's physicians. Controversies exist over the interpretation of serologic tests, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) abnormalities, diagnostic criteria, and treatment regimens. Its occurrence with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has raised fears of its recrudescence. A critical analysis of the evidence behind these viewpoints leads to several conclusions: the CSF VDRL is the most appropriate diagnostic test; pleocytosis is the only reliable CSF measure of disease activity; commonly accepted diagnostic criteria do not exclude nonsyphilitic disease; and treatment requires the prolonged use of parenteral penicillin, but no superior regimen has been found. Most data do not currently support the view that concurrent HIV infection produces accelerated or resistant neurosyphilis.
神经梅毒至今仍困扰着当今的医生。在血清学检测的解读、脑脊液(CSF)异常、诊断标准和治疗方案方面存在争议。其与人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染同时出现引发了对其复发的担忧。对这些观点背后的证据进行批判性分析可得出几个结论:脑脊液性病研究实验室玻片试验(CSF VDRL)是最合适的诊断检测;细胞增多是疾病活动唯一可靠的脑脊液指标;普遍接受的诊断标准并不排除非梅毒疾病;治疗需要长期使用胃肠外青霉素,但尚未发现更优的治疗方案。目前大多数数据并不支持同时感染HIV会导致神经梅毒加速发展或产生耐药性这一观点。